Search

Purpose: To establish evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-α) agents for managing uveitis patients. Methods: Medline was searched via OVID (1950 - October Week 3, 2011) using a Cochrane highly sensitive search (phases 1 and 2). Additional literature searches were also conducted incuding the following databases: the Cochrane, LILACS and the TRIP Database. Results: A total of 54 studies met all of the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. A different level of recommendation and evidence is assigned to each anti-TNF-α agent. The overall rate of reported side effects with anti-TNF-α agents for the treatment of uvetis which required discontinuation of therapy was 2.2% (26/1147 patients). Conclusion: Based on the evidence gathered, infliximab and adalimumab seem to be effective in the management of immune-mediated uveitis. Further randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of these agents are warranted. It is the most common cause of inflammatory eye disease, with an estimated prevalence of 115 cases per 100,000 persons.1 Endogenous or associated with a systemic disease, noninfectious uveitis accounts for approximately 75% of total cases comprising of a heterogeneous group of inflammatory conditions responsible for about 10% of legal blindness in developed nations.1,2 Endogenous uveitides are thought to have an autoimmune component mediated by T lymphocytes specific to intraocular antigens that have failed to successfully pass basic processes designed to maintain self-tolerance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) for patients with intermediate uveitis (IU). Methods: A prospective, randomized pilot study was performed on patients with recalcitrant IU associated with degradation of visual acuity (VA) despite standard treatment. Outcome measures (VA, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber and vitreous cellular infiltrate) were collected. Results: Sixteen patients (18 eyes) were randomized to the PPV IMT group. Nine of 11 eyes (82%) treated with PPV showed resolution of inflammation at follow-up, at 5.93 years. Four of 7 eyes (57%) given IMT had persistent inflammation requiring subsequent PPV. PPV patients showed greater improvement in Snellen line, IOP, and vitreous cell reduction. Three PPV patients had cystoid macular edema (CME) initially; all resolved postoperatively. CME improved in 2 of 3 eyes using IMT. Conclusions: A higher percentage of patients treated with PPV had improvement of uveitis compared to those given IMT. A multicentered clinical trial is needed to confirm and statistically validate these conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the use of biological response modifiers (BRM) in the treatment of refractory childhood uveitis. Design: Retrospective non-comparative case series of pediatric patients with uveitis treated with BRM. Participants: 23 pediatric patients. Methods: All children (18 years or younger) who received a BRM were assessed for visual changes, time to control inflammation, and any associated adverse side effects. Thirteen patients were treated with infliximab, five with adalimumab, and five with daclizumab. All patients had bilateral eye involvement. Diagnoses of the participants included juvenile idiopathic arthritis, keratouveitis, sarcoid panuveitis, Adamantiades-Behcets disease, and idiopathic panuveitis. Main outcome measures: Inflammation and visual acuity. Results: In the infliximab group 16 of 26 eyes (62%), and 10 of 13 patients (77%) demonstrated an improvement in visual acuity. Twenty of 26 eyes (77%) demonstrated an improvement in the degree of inflammation. In the adalimumab group, four of 10 eyes (40%) demonstrated an improvement in visual acuity, with five of 10 eyes (50%) demonstrating an improvement in inflammation. Four of 10 eyes (40%) in the daclizumab group demonstrated an improvement in vision with eight of 10 eyes (80%) demonstrating an improvement in inflammation. Conclusion: BRM appear to be safe to use in children, and represent a useful therapeutic adjunctive drug group for treating recalcitrant childhood uveitides. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]