Search

The efficacy and safety of an advanced category recombinant antihaemophilic factor produced by a plasma- and albumin-free method (rAHF-PFM) was studied in 111 previously treated subjects with haemophilia A. The study comprised a randomized, double-blinded, crossover pharmacokinetic comparison of rAHF-PFM and RECOMBINATE rAHF (R-FVIII); prophylaxis (three to four times per week with 25-40 IU kg(-1) rAHF-PFM) for at least 75 exposure days; and treatment of episodic haemorrhagic events. Median age was 18 years, 96% of subjects had baseline factor VIII <1%, and 108 received study drug. Bioequivalence, based on area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and adjusted in vivo recovery, was demonstrated for rAHF-PFM and R-FVIII. Mean (+/-SD) half-life for rAHF-PFM was 12.0 +/- 4.3 h. Among 510 bleeding events, 473 (93%) were managed with one or two infusions of rAHF-PFM and 439 (86%) had efficacy ratings of excellent or good. Subjects who were less adherent to the prophylactic regimen had a higher bleeding rate (9.9 episodes subject(-1) year(-1)) than subjects who were more adherent (4.4 episodes subject(-1) year(-1); P < 0.03). One subject developed a low titre, non-persistent inhibitor (2.0 BU) after 26 exposure days. These data demonstrate that rAHF-PFM is bioequivalent to R-FVIII, and suggest that rAHF-PFM is efficacious and safe, without increased immunogenicity, for the treatment of haemophilia A.

Meta-analyses of observational studies have become increasingly common to support evidence-based clinical decisions. We analyzed currently available clinical studies of full-length factor VIII (FL-FVIII) vs. B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII (BDD-rFVIII) using a random effects model to investigate possible differences in clinical efficacy in patients treated during prophylaxis. Some studies reported breakthrough bleeding incidence as mean annual total bleeds, whereas others reported median bleeds. In accord with the consensus recommendations by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group, all available studies where included. For analysis, data were combined by converting median to mean annual total bleeds using a conversion factor of 2.6, based on clinical data previously compiled by the Universal Data Collection Program of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To evaluate the sensitivity of our model upon the choice of conversion factor, we re-estimated incidence rate ratios for breakthrough bleeding over a wide range of conversion factors from 1.4-2.6. Even at the lowest extreme conversion factor of 1.4, bleeding incidence was statistically higher in patients treated with BDD-rFVIII compared with FL-FVIII. We also examined the impact of reported patient age on our multivariate model. Exposure to BDD-rFVIII remained an independent predictor of bleeding, regardless of patient age at start or mean age during prophylaxis. These analyses further support the robustness of our meta-analysis and its conclusions.

Recently reported data suggest the possibility of differences in clinical efficacy between full-length factor VIII (FL-FVIII) and B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII (BDD-rFVIII). To address this question, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies reporting the incidence of bleeding under prophylaxis, as well as studies of FL-FVIII and BDD-rFVIII half-life. The pooled cumulative weekly prophylactic dose of BDD-rFVIII (81.3 +/- 13.8 IU kg(-1) week(-1)) was greater by 36% (P = 0.11) than that of FL-FVIII (60.0 +/- 5.9 IU kg(-1) week(-1)). The pooled incidence of bleeding in BDD-rFVIII recipients [16.8 bleeds per patient year; confidence interval (CI), 9.5-24.2 bleeds per patient year] was more than 2.5-fold larger (P < 0.0005) than that in patients receiving FL-FVIII (6.6 bleeds per patient year; CI, 4.7-8.5 bleeds per patient year). In a multivariate analysis, the incidence rate ratio was 2.10 (CI, 1.98-2.24), indicating that breakthrough bleeding under prophylaxis was more than twice as likely with BDD-rFVIII than FL-FVIII at equivalent doses and ages. The pooled half-life for plasma-derived FL-FVIII (13.7 h; CI, 12.8-14.6 h) was closely similar to that for recombinant FL-FVIII (14.3 h; CI, 13.3-15.4 h). By contrast, the pooled half-life for BDD-rFVIII (11.3 h; CI, 9.9-12.7 h) was shorter by approximately 3 h compared with FL-FVIII. Although the results of the meta-analysis need to be interpreted with caution, the pooled data suggest that breakthrough bleeding under prophylaxis may occur more frequently in patients receiving BDD-rFVIII than FL-FVIII and may at least partly reflect a more abbreviated half-life of BDD-rFVIII. Several biochemical differences between BDD-rFVIII and FL-FVIII may underlie the observed disparities in bleeding incidence and half-life. This meta-analysis should be confirmed by further studies.

Infusions of factor VIII at 50-100 U/kg were administered "on demand" for bleeding episodes, or once weekly, in eight patients (aged 3-20 years) with hemophilia A and historically high titer inhibitors to factor VIII. Inhibitors were eliminated and immunologic tolerance to factor VIII occurred in five of the eight patients within 5-31 months. Four patients had minimal anamnestic responses upon starting factor VIII infusions. One patient, who continued on weekly factor VIII after appearance of the inhibitor, had a continued rise in titer for 10 weeks, followed by a gradual decrease and elimination of the inhibitor at 24 months. Three patients had marked anamnestic rises in the inhibitor levels (204-2150 BU) at the start of the factor VIII infusions, followed by a slow fall and eventual suppression of the inhibitor titers to less than 15 BU. The administration of IgG, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone was only partially successful at enhancing inhibitor suppression in two of the highest responding patients. This less intensive factor VIII infusion program appeared as effective, better tolerated, and less costly than other more intensive protocols utilizing daily factor VIII for inducing immune tolerance in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.