1. High SARS-CoV-2 secondary infection rates in households with children in Georgia, United States, Fall 2020-Winter 2021.
- Author
-
Nowak KD, Lane MA, Mbanya A, Carter JR, Binion BA, Espinoza DO, Collins MH, Heaney CD, Pisanic N, Kruczynski K, Spicer K, Rivera MG, Glover F, Ojo-Akosile T, Breiman RF, Anderson EJ, Lobelo F, and Fairley JK
- Subjects
- Humans, Georgia epidemiology, Child, Female, Male, Cross-Sectional Studies, Adult, Child, Preschool, Adolescent, Saliva virology, Middle Aged, Reinfection epidemiology, Infant, Young Adult, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 transmission, Family Characteristics, SARS-CoV-2
- Abstract
Background: A wide range of household secondary infection rates has been reported, and the role of children in population transmission dynamics for SARS-CoV-2 remains ill-defined. We sought to better understand household infection early in the pandemic., Methodology: A cross-sectional study of 17 households in the Atlanta metropolitan area with at least one child and one case of COVID-19 in the prior 1-4 months were recruited between December 2020 and April 2021. Self-collected saliva samples were tested on a multiplexed platform to detect IgG antibodies that bind to SARS-CoV-2 antigens. Secondary infection rates (SIR) were calculated and compared., Results: We report results on 17 families, including 66 individuals. We found an average SIR of 0.58; children and adults were similarly infected (62% children vs. 75% adults) ( p = 0.2). Two out of 17 households had a pediatric index per our definition. Number of pediatric infections per household ( p = 0.18), isolation ( p = 0.34), and mask wearing ( p = 0.80) did not differ significantly among households with an SIR above the mean vs. those with SIR below the mean. Households with higher SIR also had a higher number of symptomatic cases ( p < 0.001)., Discussion: We demonstrated high household SIRs at the early stages of the pandemic in late 2020 to early 2021 with similar impact on children and adults. The ease of collecting saliva and the detection of asymptomatic infections highlight the advantages of this strategy and potential for scale-up., Competing Interests: EJA has consulted for Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, Janssen, and Medscape, and his institution receives funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from MedImmune, Regeneron, PaxVax, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, Sanofi-Pasteur, Janssen, and Micron. He also serves on a safety monitoring board for Kentucky BioProcessing, Inc. and Sanofi Pasteur. His institution has also received funding from NIH to conduct clinical trials of Moderna and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Nowak, Lane, Mbanya, Carter, Binion, Espinoza, Collins, Heaney, Pisanic, Kruczynski, Spicer, Rivera, Glover, Ojo-Akosile, Breiman, Anderson, Lobelo and Fairley.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF