Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has substantially strained health systems across the globe. In particular, documented disruptions to voluntary family planning and reproductive health care due to competing health priorities, service disruptions, stockouts, and lockdowns are significantly impacting reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. As governments and family planning programmes grapple with how best to respond to the direct and indirect effects of the pandemic on family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH), the implementation and adaptation of evidence-based practices is crucial. In this commentary, we outline applications of the High Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIPs) towards COVID-19 response efforts. The HIPs are a set of evidence-based family planning practices which reflect global expert consensus on what works in family planning programming. Drawing upon preliminary COVID-19 data, documented experiences from prior health emergencies, and recommended programme adaptations from a variety of global health partners, we outline situations where specific HIPs may assist family planning programme managers in developing context-specific and evidence-based responses to COVID-19-related impacts on FP/RH, with the ultimate goal of ensuring the accessibility, availability, and continuity of voluntary family planning services across the world.

Background: The 1983 Turkish Population Planning Act aimed at improving reproductive health outcomes. We examined the effects of the Act and of modernisation in a small, underdeveloped city and province, Kars., Methods: Between June 2009 and January 2010, 576 parous women at a hospital in Kars participated in a study of reproductive histories and living standards. Results were compared by decade during which the birth took place of the first child who survived its first year, and urban/rural residence. Correlation and multi-way analyses of variance (ANOVA), χ(2) and t tests were used as appropriate. We also examined women's education and living standards and use of hospital and family planning (FP) facilities., Result: From 1970 through 2009 maternal age at first live birth increased by 4.9 years (p < 0.05) from a baseline of 18.9 years. The number of pregnancies fell from a mean of 8.1 per woman in the 1970s to 5.6 in the 1980s (p < 0.05), with strong indications of continued decreases through the 2000-2009 decade. FP sites in Kars province increased in number and services, as did antenatal hospital visits and the proportions of women giving birth in a hospital. Concomitantly, delivery by caesarean section augmented markedly over the decades. Education levels of both urban and rural women rose from two years of schooling in the 1970s to ten years in the last decade., Conclusion: Modernisation, including increasing urbanisation, education, and new governmental policies that translated into maternal-child health and FP services were likely the backbone for improved reproductive health and lower fertility rates of women in Kars over the 40 year-period we studied.