1. Cerebrospinal fluid angiotensin-converting enzyme for diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis
- Author
-
Nicolas Vuilleumier, Patrice H. Lalive, Claire Bridel, and Delphine S. Courvoisier
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pathology ,Sarcoidosis ,Immunology ,Central Nervous System Diseases/cerebrospinal fluid/diagnosis ,Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A ,Gastroenterology ,Cerebrospinal fluid ,Central Nervous System Diseases ,Internal medicine ,Immunology and Allergy ,Medicine ,Humans ,ddc:576 ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,Lumbar puncture ,Multiple sclerosis ,Area under the curve ,Neurosarcoidosis ,Biological Markers/cerebrospinal fluid ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Neurology ,Female ,Sarcoidosis/cerebrospinal fluid/diagnosis ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Vasculitis ,Biomarkers ,Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/cerebrospinal fluid - Abstract
Background Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a rare condition that may mimic central nervous system (CNS) infection, neoplasia and other inflammatory disorders of the CNS such as multiple sclerosis, encephalitis and vasculitis. Diagnosis is challenging in cases with minimal or absent systemic involvement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) angiotensin-converting enzyme (c-ACE) has been claimed as a valuable diagnostic tool for NS. However, there is little data evaluating its performance in routine clinical practice. Findings We performed a monocentric, retrospective, chart-based study including all patients investigated with a lumbar puncture and c-ACE dosage for suspected NS between 01/01/2006 and 31/12/2012 at the Geneva University Hospital. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were performed to calculate the optimal cut-off value of c-ACE and to determine the discriminative ability of c-ACE. Of the 440 patients included in the study, 9 were diagnosed with NS on the basis of tissue biopsy. Mean c-ACE was not significantly different between NS and non-NS patients. With a cut-off value of 2 (0–2 vs ≥ 3), sensitivity and specificity of c-ACE were 66.7% and 67.3%, respectively. Conclusions In our clinical setting, the sensitivity and specificity of c-ACE for NS diagnosis were relatively poor and of little clinical utility.
- Published
- 2015