1. Impact of the modified SESAME ultrasound protocol implementation on patients with cardiac arrest in the emergency department
- Author
-
Ji Han Lee, Gwan Jin Park, Hoon Kim, Suk Woo Lee, Sang Chul Kim, and Su Yeong Pyo
- Subjects
Male ,Resuscitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Advanced Cardiac Life Support ,Pericardial effusion ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Clinical Protocols ,medicine ,Humans ,Thoracotomy ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Ultrasonography ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Retrospective cohort study ,General Medicine ,Thrombolysis ,Emergency department ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Pulmonary embolism ,Point-of-Care Testing ,Pericardiocentesis ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Female ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,business ,Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - Abstract
Introduction Point-of-care (POC) ultrasound protocols are commonly used for the initial management of patients with cardiac arrest in the emergency department (ED). However, there is little published evidence regarding any mortality benefit. We compared and studied the effect of implementation of the modified SESAME protocol in terms of clinical outcomes and resuscitation management. Methods This was a single-center retrospective observational study. We conducted a pre- and post-intervention study to evaluate changes in patient outcomes and management after educating emergency medicine residents and the faculty about the modified SESAME protocol. The pre-intervention period lasted from March 2018 to February 2019, and the post-intervention period lasted from May 2019 to April 2020. The modified SESAME protocol education was initiated in March 2019. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the associations between independent variables and outcomes. Results A total of 334 patients were included in this study during a 24-month period. We found no significant differences between the two groups for the primary outcome of survival to hospital admission (pre-intervention group 28.9% versus post-intervention group 28.6%; P = 0.751), survival to hospital discharge (12.1% vs. 12.4%; P = 0.806), and good neurologic outcome at discharge (6.0% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.509). The proportion of resuscitation procedures of thrombolysis, emergency transfusion, tube thoracotomy, and pericardiocentesis during resuscitation increased from 0.6% in the pre-intervention period to 4.9% in the post-intervention period (P = 0.016). Conclusion We did not discover any significant survival benefits associated with the implementation of the modified SESAME protocol; however, early diagnosis of specific pathologies (pericardial effusion, possible pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, and hypovolemia) and accordingly a direct increase in the resuscitation management were seen in this study. Future studies with larger sample sizes are required to examine the clinical outcomes as well as to identify the most effective POC ultrasonography protocols for non-traumatic cardiac arrests.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF