1. Robotic single-site versus multiport radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: An analysis of 62 cases from a single institution
- Author
-
Hyewon Chung, Sanghoon Kwon, So-Jin Shin, Tae-Kyu Jang, and Chi-Heum Cho
- Subjects
early stage cervical cancer ,robotic multiport radical hysterectomy ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Biophysics ,Uterine Cervical Neoplasms ,Hysterectomy ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Robotic Surgical Procedures ,Single site ,Hospital discharge ,Medicine ,Humans ,Stage (cooking) ,Radical Hysterectomy ,Single institution ,Lymph node ,Retrospective Studies ,Cervical cancer ,030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine ,business.industry ,robotic single‐site radical hysterectomy ,Robotics ,medicine.disease ,Computer Science Applications ,Surgery ,Dissection ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Lymph Node Excision ,Female ,Laparoscopy ,Original Article ,business - Abstract
Background This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes and cost of robotic single‐site radical hysterectomy (RSSRH) versus robotic multiport radical hysterectomy (RMPRH) with pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer. Methods Sixty‐two patients with early stage cervical cancer were recruited between November 2011 and July 2017 and underwent RSSRH (20 patients) and RMPRH (42 patients) for early stage cervical cancer using the da Vinci Si Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical). Results There were no significant difference between the two groups in most of parameters. However, postoperative hospital discharge and total hospital costs for RSSRH were significantly shorter than RMPRH (both p
- Published
- 2021