Search

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of moisturizers on acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT).PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from April 2015 to March 2020. Assessments included type of intervention, cohort, outcomes, and quality of evidence. To evaluate the effect of moisturizer on ARD, we restricted analyses to studies comparing with standard skin care or no treatment. Outcomes were ARD severity and skin-related QOL (quality of life). Eligible studies were identified, and risk ratios and mean differences were extracted to compare outcome data.We screened 210 RCTs along with 14 studies included in a previous iteration of this analysis (2016), supplemented by a hand search (n = 9). Finally, we included 6 RCTs that investigated the effectiveness of standard type moisturizers in breast cancer patients receiving RT. Evidence (weak certainty) suggests that moisturizer use might reduce ≥ grade 3 ARD. QOL assessed by Skindex-16 improved with moisturizer use. Pain and pruritus measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) resulted in a smaller and nonsignificant difference in favor of moisturizer use. However, the certainty of the evidence was very weak in QOL.The proactive use of moisturizer may play a role in reducing ARD and improving skin-related QOL, although the certainty of the evidence was weak to very weak. Future high-quality RCTs should be initiated to strengthen these results.

Purpose This FAEISS study was designed to confirm the superior efficacy of reactive topical corticosteroid strategies employing serially ranking-DOWN from very strong steroid levels for the treatment of facial acneiform rash induced by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors (EGFRIs), in comparison with strategies employing serially ranking-UP from weak steroid levels. This article reports the primary results of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) part of the trial. Methods Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib or afatinib were enrolled in the first registration. All patients received preemptive therapy with oral minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer from the initiation of an EGFR inhibitor. Enrolled patients who developed facial acneiform rash within 2 weeks were randomized at second registration to either a ranking-UP (WEAK) group or a ranking-DOWN group. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥ 2 facial acneiform rash over 8 weeks. Results Fifty-one patients were enrolled at the first registration and received EGFRIs (n = 30 for afatinib, n = 21 for erlotinib). However, 35 patients did not develop facial acneiform rash within 2 weeks; one patient discontinued preemptive treatment. Fifteen patients (29.4%) were enrolled in the second registration; nine were assigned to the WEAK group and six to the DOWN group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade ≥ 2 facial acneiform rash between the WEAK group (one patient, twice) and the DOWN group (one patient, twice; p = 0.8417). No patients developed severe facial acneiform rash within 10 weeks. Conclusion In NSCLC patients who received EGFRIs, preemptive therapy of oral minocycline and heparinoid moisturizer reduced facial acneiform rash incidence. Trial registration UMIN000024113

Background Recent improvement of machinery evaluation for the skin changes in various therapies enabled us to evaluate fine changes quantitatively. In this study, we performed evaluation of the changes in radiation dermatitis (RD) using quantitative and qualitative methods, and verified the validity of the conventional qualitative assessment for clinical use. Methods Forty-three breast cancer patients received conventional fractionated radiotherapy to whole breast after breast-conserving surgery. Erythema, pigmentation and skin dryness were evaluated qualitatively, and biophysical parameters of RD were measured using a Multi-Display Device MDD4 with a Corneometer for capacitance, a Tewameter for transepidermal water loss (TEWL), a Mexameter for erythema index and melanin index. Measurements were performed periodically until 1 year. Results The quantitative manifestations developed serially from skin erythema followed by dryness and pigmentation. Quantitative measurements detected the effects of irradiation earlier than that of qualitative indices. However, the grades of the domains in RD by qualitative and quantitative assessment showed similar time courses and peak periods. However, no significant correlation was observed between the skin dryness grade and skin barrier function. In contrast to serial increase in pigmentation grades, melanin index showed initial decrease followed by marked increase with significant correlation with pigmentation grades. Conclusion Subjectively and objectively measured results of RD were almost similar course and peak points through the study. Therefore, validity of the conventional qualitative scoring for RD is confirmed by the present quantitative assessments. Instrumental evaluations revealed the presence of modest inflammatory changes before radiotherapy and long-lasting skin dryness, suggesting indication of intervention for RD.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and anti-EGFR antibodies commonly develop skin toxicities including acneiform eruption (AfE). However, precise skin changes and risk factors for severe AfE are still unclear. The objective of the current study was elucidation of the useful parameters for early and sensitive detection of the skin changes by EGFRI. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin surface hydration, skin surface lipid levels and erythema/melanin index were serially measured for 2 weeks in 19 EGFR-TKI afatinib/erlotinib-treated patients and for 8 weeks in 20 anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab-treated patients. The TEWL levels of the cheek in the patients who developed AfE of grade 2 and more (AfE ≥ Gr2) were already elevated at 7 days after the initiation of afatinib/erlotinib therapy compared with those before therapy as well as in patients with grade 1 or less (AfE ≤ Gr1). In patients treated with cetuximab, the skin surface hydration on the cheek in AfE ≥ Gr2 patients significantly decreased compared with that of AfE ≤ Gr1 patients at the 2nd and 6th week. Baseline skin surface lipid levels and erythema index on the cheek of patients with AfE ≥ Gr2 were significantly higher than those with AfE ≤ Gr1. The small sample size of the present study, especially for logistic regression analysis, is a limitation. In conclusion, instrumental evaluation declared rapid inflammatory changes of the skin by EGFRI and elucidated oily skin as a risk for severe AfE.

PurposeMany breast cancer patients suffer from chemotherapy-induced hair loss. Accurate information about temporal changes in chemotherapy-induced hair loss is important for supporting patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy, because it helps them to prepare. However, accurate information, on issues such as the frequency of hair loss after chemotherapy, when regrowth starts, the condition of regrown hair, and the frequency of incomplete hair regrowth, is lacking. This study aimed to clarify the long-term temporal changes in chemotherapy-induced hair loss using patient-reported outcomes for chemotherapy-induced hair loss.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Disease-free patients who had completed adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of anthracycline and/or taxanes for breast cancer within the prior 5 years were enrolled from 47 hospitals and clinics in Japan. Descriptive statistics were obtained in this study. The study is reported according to the STROBE criteria.ResultsThe response rate was 81.5% (1511/1853), yielding 1478 questionnaires. Hair loss occurred in 99.9% of patients. The mean time from chemotherapy until hair loss was 18.0 days. Regrowth of scalp hair occurred in 98% of patients. The mean time from the completion of chemotherapy to the beginning of regrowth was 3.3 months. Two years after chemotherapy completion, the scalp-hair recovery rate was ConclusionsOur survey focused on chemotherapy-induced hair loss in breast cancer patients. We believe these results to be useful for patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy.

This study was conducted to identify factors influencing patients’ decisions to undergo breast reconstruction, and to identify the influences of breast reconstruction on patient behavior and psychological well-being. Data were collected from January to June 2011, using a questionnaire distributed to women ≤45 years old with breast cancer, at five medical institutes across Japan. Completed questionnaires were collected from 316 women (mean age: 39.46 ± 4.4 years, range: 27–45 years). Overall, 174 patients received breast-conserving surgery, 101 received mastectomy, 31 received subcutaneous mastectomy, 3 patients received none, and 49 were unreported). The data indicated a reconstruction rate of 36.7 % in women who underwent mastectomy. The most prevalent reason for not undergoing breast reconstruction was the fear of cancer relapse. Other factors mentioned were to avoid additional distress on the body from surgery, financial reasons, and a belief that breast reconstruction is unnecessary. The main factor that influenced the decision not to undergo delayed breast reconstruction, specifically, was the expense. Women who had completed breast reconstruction showed higher self-evaluations of physical attractiveness and were more active in comparison to those who did not. However, regardless of having undergone breast reconstruction or not, women who reported higher levels of self-consciousness over the treated areas showed more restrictions on activity and higher chances of a decline in psychological well-being. Regardless of deciding to undergo breast reconstruction or not, the results of this study suggested the need for cognitive interventions to avoid patients fixating on self-consciousness over treated areas.

This study examined both the frequency of appearance-related symptoms and distress resulting from these symptoms in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Self-report questionnaires were distributed to 753 outpatients receiving ≧ 4 weeks of treatment at an outpatient chemotherapy center. Valid responses were returned by 638 patients (response rate, 84.7%). Participants were questioned about 57 appearance-related symptoms (AS) and 23 non-appearance-related physical symptoms (non-AS); psychological well-being was assessed using a shortened version of the Derriford Appearance Scale 59.Questionnaire responses were obtained from 264 male and 374 female patients (mean age, 59.5 years; range, 18-85 years). Most respondents (80.3%) were concerned with changes in appearance resulting from treatment. By sex and disease type, women suffered more than men, and treatment for breast cancer created the greatest distress for women.Cancer patients are concerned about a variety of AS, and these may result in greater distress than non-AS. AS-related information and care are increasingly being sought in advance of treatment.