Search

To describe the results of the 6-min walking test performed on admission to an intensive rehabilitation program after cardiac surgery and to develop, through an algorithm based on a few clinical indicators, reference tables in order to apply distance walked values more efficiently in the individual patient at his/her entry into a cardiac rehabilitation program.Intensive cardiac rehabilitation units.A total of 2,555 consecutive patients admitted between January 2001 and December 2002 to the Cardiac Rehabilitation Department of the S. Maugeri Foundation early after cardiac surgery performed a 6-min walking test within the fourth day of hospital admission.The mean walked distance was 296 +/- 111 m (+/- SD). At multiple regression analysis, age, sex, and comorbidity were independent predictors of walking test performance. The left ventricular ejection fraction only influenced the walked distance in men. Starting from these variables, we propose an algorithm and specific reference tables.Reference values for gender-, age-, comorbidity-, and systolic function-related test performance in patients after cardiac surgery at the beginning of the rehabilitative phase are provided. Once a new patient has been categorized through simple parameters, the actual distance walked could be compared with the matched reference value, thus making the interpretation of the result more efficient. The walked distance might be used to define different levels of disability and to personalize therapeutic exercise prescriptions.

The Beta-blocker Strategy plus Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (BEST-ICD) Trial is a multicenter prospective randomized trial that started in June 1998, in 95 centers in Italy and Germany. The trial will test the hypothesis whether, in high-risk post myocardial infarction (MI) patients already treated with beta blockers, electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided therapy (including the prophylactic implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] in inducible patients) will improve survival compared with conventional therapy. Patients eligible for the study are survivors of recent MI (or = 5 andor = 21 days), agedor = 80 years, with left ventricular ejection fractionor = 35% andor = 1 of the following additional risk factors: (1) ventricular premature beatsor = 10/hour; (2) decreased heart rate variability (standard deviation of unusual RR intervals70 msec); and (3) presence of ventricular late potentials. Furthermore, all enrolled patients must be able to tolerate at least 25 mg of metoprolol per day. These patients constitute about 9% of all patients with recent MI and are expected to have a 2-year all-cause mortality25% of which 50% is anticipated to be from sudden death. The main criteria of exclusion from the study are (1) a history of sustained ventricular arrhythmia; (2) documentation of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia during the screening phase; and (3) the need for myocardial revascularization and contraindications or intolerance to beta-blocker therapy. Eligible patients will be randomized to 2 different therapeutic strategies: conventional strategy or EPS/ICD strategy. Patients allocated to the EPS/ICD strategy will undergo further risk stratification, and electrophysiologically inducible patients (approximately 35%) will receive prophylactic ICDs, in addition to the conventional therapy, whereas noninducible patients will be only conventionally treated. The primary endpoint of the study will be death from all causes. By hypothesizing a 30% reduction in the 2-year mortality (from 20% to 14%) in the EPS/ICD group compared with conventionally treated patients, 1,200 patients will have to be included. A triangular, 2-sided sequential design with preset boundaries, for a 5% significance level and 90% power to detect a reduction in 2-year mortality from 20% to 14%, will be used to permit early termination of the trial if the strategy is found to be efficacious, no difference, or inefficacious.