1. Quantification of Urine Elimination Behaviors in Cats with a Video Recording System
- Author
-
M. Hopfensperger, Robert Malinowski, D. R. Dulaney, J. G. Hauptman, and John M. Kruger
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,040301 veterinary sciences ,Urinary system ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Video Recording ,Urology ,Urination ,Urination frequency ,Standard Article ,Urine ,Cat Diseases ,0403 veterinary science ,Chronic kidney disease ,Feline idiopathic cystitis ,Cystitis ,medicine ,Nephrology/Urology ,Animals ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ,Prospective cohort study ,media_common ,Video recording ,CATS ,General Veterinary ,business.industry ,Urination time ,0402 animal and dairy science ,Urination Frequency ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,040201 dairy & animal science ,Standard Articles ,Litter box ,Anesthesia ,Eliminative Behavior, Animal ,Cats ,Female ,SMALL ANIMAL ,business ,Behavior Observation Techniques - Abstract
Background Urinary disorders in cats often require subjective caregiver quantification of clinical signs to establish a diagnosis and monitor therapeutic outcomes. Objective To investigate use of a video recording system (VRS) to better assess and quantify urination behaviors in cats. Animals Eleven healthy cats and 8 cats with disorders potentially associated with abnormal urination patterns. Methods Prospective study design. Litter box urination behaviors were quantified with a VRS for 14 days and compared to daily caregiver observations. Video recordings were analyzed by a behavior analysis software program. Results The mean number of urinations per day detected by VRS (2.5 ± 0.7) was significantly higher compared with caregiver observations (0.6 ± 0.6; P < .0001). Five cats were never observed in the litter box by their caregivers. The mean number of urinations per day detected by VRS was significantly higher for abnormal cats (2.9 ± 0.7) compared with healthy cats (2.1 ± 0.7; P = .02); there were no apparent differences in frequency between these groups reported by caregivers (0.7 ± 1.0 and 0.5 ± 1.0, respectively). There were no differences in mean urination time between healthy and abnormal cats as determined by VRS or caregivers. Mean cover-up time determined by VRS was significantly longer in healthy cats (22.7 ± 12.9 seconds/urination) compared with abnormal cats (8.7 ± 12.9 seconds/urination; P = .03); differences in cover-up time were not detected by caregivers. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Caregivers commonly underestimate urination frequency in cats when compared to video-based observations. Video recording appears to facilitate objective assessment of urination behaviors and could be of value in future clinical studies of urinary disorders in cats.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF