1. Is suture-based cerclage biomechanically superior to traditional metallic cerclage for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures: A matched pair cadaveric study.
- Author
-
Han S, Frangie R, Lanfermeijer ND, Gold JE, Ismaily SK, Yoo A, Pletka CA, and Rodriguez-Quintana D
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Aged, Male, Biomechanical Phenomena, Fracture Fixation, Internal methods, Fracture Fixation, Internal instrumentation, Bone Wires, Femur surgery, Aged, 80 and over, Suture Techniques, Metals, Femoral Fractures surgery, Cadaver, Periprosthetic Fractures surgery, Sutures
- Abstract
Background: While traditional metallic cerclage remains the primary method in clinical application, non-metallic cerclage systems have recently gained popularity due to low risks of soft tissue irritation and bone intrusion. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of a novel non-metallic suture-based cerclage in comparison to traditional metallic cerclage cables for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures., Methods: An extended trochanteric osteotomy was performed on eight pairs of cadaveric femora, followed by reduction using either metallic cerclages (Group I) or the suture-based cerclage (Group II). A modular tapered fluted stem was then implanted in each specimen. The fragment translation during canal preparation and stem implantation was quantified using laser-scanning. Subsequently, each specimen underwent 500 cycles of multiaxial loading, with fragment translation and stem subsidence measured using a motion capture system., Findings: Following stem implantation, specimens in Group II exhibited a significantly greater lateral fragment translation (466 μm vs 754 μm, p = 0.017). However, there were no significant differences in anterior and distal translation between groups (p > 0.05). During multiaxial loading, the average stem subsidence in Group I was 0.36 mm (range, 0.04-1.42 mm), compared to 0.41 mm (range, 0.03-1.29) in Group II (p > 0.05). No significant difference was found in fragment translations between the two groups (p > 0.05)., Interpretation: The suture-based cerclage system exhibited comparable biomechanical performance in fixation stability to conventional metallic cerclage cables. Yet, it was associated with a larger residual lateral gap between the fragments following stem implantation. Ultimately, the choice of fixation method should account for multiple factors, including patient characteristics, surgeon preference, and bone quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David Rodriguez-Quintana reports a relationship with Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. that includes: paid speaker, paid consultant, and research support. The metallic cerclage cables used in this study were donated by Zimmer Biomet. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF