Search

Introduction: High loosening rates after distal femoral replacement may be due to implant design not adapted to specific anatomic and biomechanical conditions., Materials and Methods: A modular tumor system (MUTARS ® , Implantcast GmbH) was implanted with either a curved hexagonal or a straight tapered stems in eight Sawbones ® in two consecutively generated bone defect (10 cm and 20 cm proximal to knee joint level). Implant-bone-interface micromotions were measured to analyze main fixation areas and to characterize the fixation pattern., Results: Although areas of highest relative micromotions were measured distally in all groups, areas and lengths of main fixation differed with respect to stem design and bone defect size. Regardless of these changes, overall micromotions could only be reduced with extending bone defects in case of tapered stems., Conclusions: The tapered design may be favorable in larger defects whereas the hexagonal may be advantageous in defects located more distally.

Background: Several studies have shown that patients with a unilateral amputation have an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA) in the knee of their sound leg. OBJECTIVE: The first objective was to investigate whether amputees are more frequently affected by gon-, cox- or polyarthritis as well as back pain or spinal disorders. We hypothesized that mobile and active transfemoral amputees more often experience OA and spinal disorders than non-amputees. The second objective was to compare the mean age of the patients with OA., Patients: Patients with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (n = 1,569) and five abled-body control groups (each n = 1,569) matched in terms of age and gender resulting in total of 9,414 participants., Methods: Groups were analyzed regarding the prevalence of six selected diagnoses regarding musculoskeletal disorders., Results: A significantly decreased prevalence of OA and specific disorders of the spine in transfemoral amputees compared to a control group was found. The amputees with OA are significantly younger than patients with OA in the control group., Conclusion: The results from the presented study contradict previously published literature. Apparently circumstances of life play an important role, like physical work and strenuous activities which are likely to be underrepresented in the amputee group. The results of the study need to be used cautiously due to the major limitation of the study which is the lack of detail in individual patients caused by the methodology., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: Aseptic loosening is the major reason for failure of distal femoral replacement using current modular megaprostheses. Although the same stems are used for proximal and distal replacement, survival rates in clinical studies with distal reconstruction were lower within the same system compared to proximal reconstruction. We analyzed whether primary stability as presupposition for long-term fixation can be achieved with a current tapered stem design. Additionally, we hypothesized that stem length affects primary stability depending on bone defect situations., Methods: A modular tumor system (Megasystem-C®, Link GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) with two different tapered stems (100 and 160mm) was implanted in eight Sawbones® in two consecutively created defect situations (10 and 20cm proximal to knee joint level). Primary rotational stability was investigated by measuring relative micromotions between implant and bone to identify the main fixation areas and to characterize the fixation pattern., Results: The fixation differed between the two stem lengths and with respect to both defect situations; however in each case the main fixation area was located at or close to the femoral isthmus. Highest relative micromotions were measured with the 160-mm stem at the distal end within small bone defects and at the proximal end when defects were increased., Conclusions: The analyzed design seemed to create sufficient primary stability along the main fixation areas of the implant. Based on these results and with respect to oncologic or potential revision situations, we suggest the use of the shorter stem to be more favorable in case of primary implant fixation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Backround: Purpose of this experimental study was to investigate the influence of cerclages on the primary stability of the MUTARS system using distally fractured synthetic femora., Methods: 4 MUTARS prostheses were implanted in synthetic femora respectively. Groups consisted of 4 intact bones, 4 fractured with cerclages and 4 fractured bones without cerclages. Spatial micromovements were measured with a high-precision rotational setup., Findings: The order from the weakest to the strongest torque transmission of the intact bones was rm1-rm4-rm2-rm3 (p=0.011) and of the fractured bones with cerclages rm4-rm1-rm3-rm2 (p=0.013). The MUTARS stems broke out of the fractured femoral shaft by removing cerclages (p<0.001) and by the influence of bone defect A (p<0.001). Overall micromovements of the intact bones were lower than those of the fractured bones without cerclages (p<0.001) and overall micromovements of the fractured bones with cerclages were lower than those of bones without cerclages (p<0.001)., Interpretation: Due to high press-fit at the proximal and distal isthmus region fissural fractures of the femur may occur. This should always be taken into account. It is advisable to secure them and provide a prophylaxis for these fissural fractures by means of cerclages., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Femoral defects often make it difficult to achieve sufficient fixation of the stem during revision surgery. No clinical studies comparing modular stems are available and differentiated recommendations are rare. The aim of this study was to compare the fixation of different revision stems in an experimental and standardised manner., Methods: Segmental AAOS type I and III defects were reproduced in four femur pairs and two modular stems of different shape (cylindrical and conical) were implanted. Interfacial stem-bone movements were measured under axial torque application to analyze the stem fixation depending on defect extension., Results: Both stems showed adequate fixation in AAOS type I defect. The defect extension significantly reduced the fixation of both implants. The fixation pattern changed significantly for the cylindrical-shaped stem but was maintained for the conical-shaped stem., Conclusions: Shape as well as the extension of femoral defect have an impact on primary fixation. A type I defect seems to be bridgeable for both stems albeit in a different way. In contrast, stem-demanding activities during the healing phase have to be avoided for the conical-shaped stem in a type III defect, whereas the cylindrical-shaped stem has already ceased to be sufficiently stable in this case.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the concept of proximal load initiation of a total short-stemmed hip arthroplasty (Metha BBraun, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) on the basis of bone variations by means of osteodensitometric dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and radiologic measurements., Methods: After power analysis 40 patients were included in this study. DXA examination, radiological and clinical follow-up was performed pre-operatively and postoperatively. Socio-demographic relevancies of bone progression and radiological changes were raised epidemiologically and clinically., Results: Improvement of the Harris hip score from 54.7 points preoperative to 96.7 points postoperative was detected (p < 0.01). Loss of summarized overall net average bone mass density (netavg BMD) could only be manifested after six months compared to the netavg BMD of the postoperative measurement (p < 0.01). After six and 12 months BMD atrophy was shown mainly in regions of interest (ROI) 1, 4 and 7. Positive correlations between changes of BMD and age, male sex and BMI were detectable. No stem had to be revised., Conclusions: The Metha implant shows excellent osseointegration at the coated area of the stem without factors of aseptic loosening in the short term. This study shows that parameters like age, sex and BMI influence BMD progression and stress shielding. Metha implant shows excellent results especially in young patients with good bone stock.

Purpose: In total hip arthroplasty fixation of revision stems can be demanding due to femoral bone loss. Strut grafts are often used for bone augmentation and stabilization of the newly inserted prosthesis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of strut grafts on primary stability under various stem fixation conditions., Methods: Two different revision stems (cylindrical and conical shape) were implanted into synthetic femora. Following a semicircular transfemoral osteotomy, three deficient femoral bearings were simulated (bony lid reattached with cable wires; weakened lid reattached with cable wires; strut grafts placed to the weakened lid with cable wires). Relative micro-movements were measured between prostheses and bones due to an axial moment applied to the stems., Results: Relative movements correlated to the stem shape. The cylindrical stem showed higher movements increasing significantly with a weakened bony lid and portrayed a slight decrease of movements with strut graft application. No unequivocal influence of the weakened lid could be detected for the conical implant. Strut graft application did not show an additional stabilizing effect., Conclusions: The primary stability of the cylindrical fixation concept decreases with impaired fixation conditions of the femur. A clear restabilizing effect with strut grafts could not be proven. A decrease of primary stability due to the impaired bone could not be observed for the conical stem shape. Additionally, strut grafts do not enhance fixation for this stem shape. We conclude that surgeons should not rely on a stabilizing effect of strut grafts in revision hip surgery.

Purpose: Extended bone defects of the proximal femur can be reconstructed by megaprostheses for which aseptic loosening constitutes one of the major failure modes. The basic requirement for long-term success of endoprostheses is primary stability. We therefore assessed whether sufficient primary stability can be achieved by four different megaprostheses in a standardised bone defect of the proximal femur and whether their different design leads to different fixation patterns., Methods: Four different designs of proximal femoral replacements were implanted into 16 Sawbones® after preparing segmental bone defects (AAOS type II). Primary rotational stability was analysed by application of a cyclic torque of ±7 Nm and measuring the relative micromotions between bone and implant at different levels. The main fixation zones and differences of fixation patterns of the stem designs were determined by an analysis of variance., Results: All four implants exhibited micromotions below 150 μm, indicating adequate primary stability. Lowest micromotions for all designs were located near the femoral isthmus. The extent of primary stability and the global implant fixation pattern differed considerably and could be related to the different design concepts., Conclusions: All megaprostheses studied provided sufficient primary stability if the fixation conditions of the femoral isthmus were intact. The design characteristics of the different stems largely determined the extent of primary stability and fixation pattern. Understanding these different fixation types could help the surgeon to choose the most suitable implant if the fixation conditions in the isthmus are compromised.

Background: Cerclage wires are widely used in revision hip surgery to reattach the lid of a femoral osteotomy. The present study compared the influence of multifilaments and monofilaments on primary stability of revision hip stems with different fixation principles., Methods: A standardized extended proximal femoral osteotomy was performed in the anterior cortex of 6 synthetic femora. We used a high-resolution measuring device to explore spatial micromovements of a diaphyseal and a metaphyseal fixating revision stem. Both of these were implanted in 3 femora. The specimens were measured again after consecutive restabilization of osteotomies with multifilaments and monofilaments. The movement graphs generated defined relative micromovements between stems and bones and the stabilizing effect of the two wire systems compared., Findings: Both multifilaments and monofilaments effected a major reduction of relative micromovements for both fixation principles. There were no differences in relative movements between the multifilament and monofilament treatments for the diaphyseal fixating stem. Yet for the metaphyseal fixating stem a significantly better restabilization was observed with multifilaments., Interpretation: Both multifilaments and monofilaments can support the revision hip stem in bridging the extended proximal femoral osteotomy. Yet, which wiring system should be chosen depends on the fixation principle of the revision stem. Multifilaments seem to be advantageous when used with metaphyseal fixating stems. However, the use of multifilaments with diaphyseal fixating components should be reconsidered as this might constrict the periosteal vascularity., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)