Search

To explore the interrelationships between the serotoninergic system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in human obesity, we evaluated cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) response to synthetic human corticotropin-releasing hormone (hCRH, 1 microgram/kg intravenously [IV]) before and after stimulation of the serotoninergic system by dextrofenfluramine (d-FF, 30 mg/d for 3 months) in nine obese women. These responses were compared with a CRH test (1 microgram/kg) carried out in nine age-matched normal-weight women. Plasma cortisol of obese subjects did not significantly increase after CRH (peak value 127.1 +/- 11.2 ng/mL v 104.1 +/- 9.5 ng/mL). This response was lower (P less than .005) than in the controls, in whom the basal cortisol value of 120.6 +/- 11.8 ng/mL reached a peak value of 221.2 +/- 13.4 ng/mL. However, after administration of d-FF, CRH significantly increased (P less than .0001) plasma cortisol (peak value 170.6 +/- 18.0 ng/mL v 111.5 +/- 10.8 ng/mL) and the response was enhanced (P less than .05) as compared with that obtained before d-FF. The ACTH levels of our patients showed a small increment after CRH injection (peak value 13.5 +/- 1.7 pg/mL v 9.6 +/- 1.1 pg/mL), but the hormonal response was lower (P less than .005) than in controls (peak value 38.1 +/- 5.5 pg/mL v 13.8 +/- 0.8 pg/mL). However, after d-FF, CRH induced a significant increment (P less than .05) in plasma ACTH at 30 minutes (20.4 +/- 3.7 pg/mL v 10.9 +/- 0.9 pg/mL) and 45 minutes (18.0 +/- 2.6 pg/mL), even though this response was not significantly different from that observed before d-FF administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Objective: To evaluate whether the supposed physiological interaction between serotoninergic and opioidergic pathways in the modulation of PRL release is preserved in human obesity, a pathological condition in which these two systems are greatly impaired., Design: According to a single-blind randomized procedure, three tests were performed: test A (oral placebo + saline infusion over 5 hours), test B (fenfluramine, a well known serotoninergic drug, 60 mg orally + saline infusion over 5 hours) and test C (fenfluramine at the same dose + naloxone, an opiate receptor antagonist, infusion over 5 hours at a dose of 3 mg/h)., Patients: Ten obese women (body mass index 34.4 +/- 2.3 kg/m2, mean +/- SE) and ten normal-weight sex and age-matched subjects (body mass index 22.3 +/- 2.4 kg/m2) volunteered for the study., Measurements: At each test, blood samples for PRL determination were collected in basal conditions (time 0) and every hour for 5 hours. Plasma PRL was determined by radioimmunoassay., Results: In controls, naloxone significantly reduced the clear-cut PRL increase induced by fenfluramine. In obese patients, serotoninergic stimulation caused an increment in PRL levels similar to that in the controls, but opioid receptor blockade by naloxone did not affect this response., Conclusions: These findings confirm that there is a physiological relationship between the serotoninergic and the opioidergic systems in the control of PRL secretion and show that this interaction is not present in obese subjects. Our data provide indirect proof of the functional impairment of these two systems in human obesity.

The aim of the present study was to ascertain if reduced central serotoninergic activity might contribute to the well-known blunted growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in obese patients. Thus, we studied the effect of prolonged stimulation of the serotoninergic system by fenfluramine (FF; 60 mg twice daily for 7 days) on GHRH-induced GH release in nine obese and seven normal subjects. In controls, GHRH (100 micrograms intravenously [IV]) injection increased GH levels from 2.3 +/- 1.8 (+/- SE) to 18.5 +/- 2.8 mU/L, P less than .002. FF administration enhanced both basal and GHRH-stimulated GH levels (peak, 38.4 +/- 8.3 v 6.9 +/- 2.6 mU/L, P less than .002). This response was significantly higher (P less than .02) than in pretreatment. In obese patients, GH responsiveness to GHRH was slight (peak, 7.1 +/- 2.0 v 0.6 +/- 0.18 mU/L, P less than .01) and lower (P less than .01) than in controls. FF administration did not affect this response. In controls, the enhanced FF-induced GH release after a maximal dose of GHRH indicates that serotoninergic activation influences GH secretion and that the mechanism involved is independent of endogenous GHRH. In obese patients, we found a blunted GH responsiveness to GHRH that was not affected by FF, thus supporting the hypothesis that the serotoninergic control on GH release is impaired.

The aim of the present study was to test whether the serotoninergic system may be involved in the well known reduced growth hormone (GH) response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (IIH) in obese patients. Ten obese women and 10 normal-weight control women underwent three IIH tests, at 14-day intervals: the first in basal conditions, the other two after randomized administration of a serotoninergic drug, fenfluramine (FF, 120 mg/day for 7 days) and FF plus ritanserin (RIT, 30 mg/day for the first 2 days and 20 mg/day on the following days). Ritanserin is a new selective 5-HT2 blocker receptor agent. Both controls and obese patients showed similar normal basal GH levels before each test and insulin administration always effectively reduced glucose levels to values lower than 2.2 mmol/l. In the controls, the expected GH increase to IIH (peak value 56 +/- 13.4 mU/l, AUC 234.4 +/- 55 mU/min/ml) was unaffected by FF administration (peak value 43 +/- 11.4; AUC 216.8 +/- 34.8). In response to the first IIH, the obese patients showed a significantly lower GH increase than in the case of the controls (peak value 21.4 +/- 4.6 mU/l, P less than 0.02; AUC 93.2 +/- 18.6, P less than 0.02). However, in comparison with the basal test, FF administration significantly (P less than 0.001) enhanced GH response to insulin hypoglycaemia (peak value 33.4 +/- 4; AUC 150 +/- 14.6), reaching values not significantly different from those of the controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In order to demonstrate the suggested failure of the serotoninergic system in human obesity and to evaluate the role of central serotoninergic activity in prolactin (PRL) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) release in this condition, 13 euthyroid obese and 9 healthy women of normal weight were studied. A TRH test (200 micrograms i.v.) was performed before and after administration of fenfluramine (FF) 60 mg b.d. for 14 days. In the controls, FF did not modify the expected significant increase in PRL induced by TRH. In obese patients, however, the PRL levels was significantly increased after TRH, but the increase was less than in the controls. After FF, the PRL response to TRH was larger than in the pretreatment phase, with values similar to those observed in normal subjects. In neither group FF did change the TSH-stimulating effect of TRH, but the hormonal response in obese patients was greater than in the controls. The restoration of the responsiveness of PRL to TRH after central serotoninergic stimulation confirms the hypothesis that a failure of the serotoninergic system may occur in human obesity. Since FF does not interfere with the secretory pattern of basal and stimulated TSH in normal or obese subjects, the serotoninergic system does not seem to play a major role in the control of TSH secretion.

In order to study the hypothesized impairment of the serotoninergic system in human obesity, an insulin tolerance test (ITT) was carried out on 12 obese normoprolactinemic women and on 6 normal-weight women before (A) and after (B) the administration of a serotoninergic drug, fenfluramine (60 mg twice a day per os for 7 days). After a washout period, a new ITT (C) followed the administration of fenfluramine at the same dose, associated with a specific S2 blocker receptor agent, ritanserin (30 mg/day for the first 2 days and 20 mg/day for a further 5 days). In obese subjects, the prolactin (PRL) response to ITT A was reduced as compared to the controls: in 6 patients ('nonresponders') the PRL levels did not change, while in the other 6 ('responders') they increased (p less than 0.003) but less than in the controls (p less than 0.02). In normal-weight subjects, the administration of fenfluramine alone or with ritanserin did not modify the PRL response to ITT. In the responders, the serotoninergic drug normalized the PRL response to ITT while significantly improving it in the nonresponders; these effects were not antagonized by ritanserin. In conclusion, our data suggest that the serotoninergic system of obese patients is impaired and that the different secretory pattern observed in the two groups before and after fenfluramine may reflect differing degrees of this impairment.