Search

Introduction: Fetal anemia from hemolytic disease treated by intrauterine transfusion (IUT) can be performed by intraperitoneal, intracardiac, and intravascular transfusion (IVT). Objective of our study was to compare different transfusion techniques. Methods: Retrospective review of IUT secondary to red cell alloimmunization was conducted at eight international centers from 2012 to 2020. Severe anemia suspected if middle cerebral artery peaks systolic velocity ≥1.5 multiples of the median. Demographic, delivery, and postnatal variables were analyzed. Results: Total of 344 procedures, 325 IVT and 19 other techniques (non-IVT) included. No difference in demographics, history of stillbirth (20.5 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.7), prior pregnancy IUT (25.6 vs. 31.6%, p = 0.5) or neonatal transfusion (36.1 vs. 43.8%, p = 0.5). At first IUT, non-IVT had higher hydrops (42.1% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.03), lower starting hematocrit (13.3% [±6] vs. 17.7% [±8.2], p = 0.04), and trend toward lower gestational age (24.6 [20.1–27] vs. 26.4 [23.2–29.6] weeks, p = 0.08). No difference in birthweight, neonatal phototherapy, exchange, or simple transfusion was observed. Conclusion: This is one of the largest studies comparing techniques to treat fetal anemia. IVT was most performed, other techniques were more likely performed in hydrops, and lower starting hematocrit was seen. Neither technique affected outcomes. This study may suggest that physician's experience may be the strongest contributor of outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Fetal anemia secondary to incompatibility between maternal-fetal blood types can result in hydrops and demise. Intrauterine transfusions have improved survival in experience centers. Our objective was to determine the practice patterns amongst fetal centers.Study Design: Thirteen fetal centers across the world were surveyed. Results from all participating centers were recorded, analyzed, and presented as ratios. Questions on the survey were related to experience of the physician, preferred methods of transfusion, fetal surveillance, and timing of delivery.Results: Differences amongst centers were as follows: 54% of the centers performed transfusions in operating room, the remaining did them in a clinic room or close to the operating room; 31% did not use maternal anesthesia, 31% used oral or intravenous sedation and 38% used a combination of local with oral or intravenous sedation. The similarities include: 84% performed intravenous transfusions, while 2 centers reported intraperitoneal and intracardiac transfusions were performed for very early cases; 85% of centers performed the last transfusion at 34-35 weeks and 77% electively delivered their patients at 37 weeks.Conclusion: Method of transfusion and delivery timing was similar in most centers; however, differences were seen in location of procedure, anesthetic coverage, and surveillance. Further assessment is needed to determine if these differences in practice have any potential neonatal effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]