Search

Background: During the second stage of labor, in case of a need for a fetal extraction at midcavity, the choice of attempting the procedure between operative vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery is difficult. Moreover, guidelines on this subject are not clear., Objective: This study aimed to identify antenatal and intrapartum parameters associated with a failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery and its association with maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes., Study Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study conducted at a tertiary maternity hospital in France from January 2010 to December 2020. Women with singleton pregnancies under epidural analgesia with nonanomalous cephalic presenting fetuses and gestational ages at ≥37 weeks of gestation, who were submitted to midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery, were included. Following the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists definition, midcavity was defined as the presenting part of the fetus (ie, the fetal head) found at stations 0 and +1. For research purposes, all patients were submitted to transperineal ultrasound to evaluate the head-to-perineum distance, however, this measurement did not affect the decision to perform a midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery. The primary outcome of the study was failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery leading to cesarean delivery or the use of a different instrument to achieve vaginal delivery., Results: Overall, 951 cases of midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery were included in this study. Failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery occurred in 242 patients (25.4%). Factors independently associated with failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery included maternal height (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-0.99; P=.002), duration of the active phase of the first stage of labor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.17; P<.001), nonocciput anterior fetal head position (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.04; P=.02), z score of the head-to-perineum distance (adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.43; P=.01), and birthweight of >4000 g (adjusted odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.26; P=.003). Women submitted to a failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery were more likely to have a major postpartum hemorrhage (7.1% vs 2.0%; P<.001), whereas neonates were more likely to have an umbilical artery pH of <7.1 (30.5% vs 19.8%; P=.001), be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (9.6% vs 4.7%; P=.005), and have a severe caput succedaneum (14.9% vs 0.7%; P<.001). Subgroup analysis on all patients with a fetal head station of 0 found that the head-to-perineum distance was the only independent variable associated with failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.12; P<.001). The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of the head-to-perineum distance in this subgroup population was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.73; P<.001), and the optimal cutoff point of the head-to-perineum distance measurement discriminating between failed and successful midcavity vacuum-assisted deliveries was 55 mm. It was associated with a 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95) sensitivity, 0.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.25) specificity, 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.42) positive predictive value, and 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.90) negative predictive value., Conclusion: Study data showed that a high fetal head station, measured using the head-to-perineum distance, and a nonocciput anterior position of the fetal head are independently associated with failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery. The result supported the systematic assessment of the sonographic head station and position before performing a midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To date, no research has focused on the sonographic quantification of the degree of flexion of the fetal head in relation to the labor outcome in women with protracted active phase of labor., Objective: This study aimed to assess the relationship between the transabdominal sonographic indices of fetal head flexion and the mode of delivery in women with protracted active phase of labor., Study Design: Prospective evaluation of women with protracted active phase of labor recruited across 3 tertiary maternity units. Eligible cases were submitted to transabdominal ultrasound for the evaluation of the fetal head position and flexion, which was measured by means of the occiput-spine angle in fetuses in nonocciput posterior position and by means of the chin-to-chest angle in fetuses in occiput posterior position. The occiput-spine angle and the chin-to-chest angle were compared between women who had vaginal delivery and those who had cesarean delivery. Cases where obstetrical intervention was performed solely based on suspected fetal distress were excluded., Results: A total of 129 women were included, of whom 43 (33.3%) had occiput posterior position. Spontaneous vaginal delivery, instrumental delivery, and cesarean delivery were recorded in 66 (51.2%), 17 (13.1%), and 46 (35.7%) cases, respectively. A wider occiput-spine angle was measured in women who had vaginal delivery compared with those submitted to cesarean delivery owing to labor dystocia (126±14 vs 115±24; P<.01). At the receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve was 0.675 (95% confidence interval, 0.538-0.812; P<.01), and the optimal occiput-spine angle cutoff value discriminating between cases of vaginal delivery and those delivered by cesarean delivery was 109°. A narrower chin-to-chest angle was measured in cases who had vaginal delivery compared with those undergoing cesarean delivery (27±33 vs 56±28 degrees; P<.01). The area under the curve of the chin-to-chest angle in relation to the mode of delivery was 0.758 (95% confidence interval, 0.612-0.904; P<.01), and the optimal cutoff value discriminating between vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery was 33.0°., Conclusion: In women with protracted active phase of labor, the sonographic demonstration of fetal head deflexion in occiput posterior and in nonocciput posterior fetuses is associated with an increased incidence of cesarean delivery owing to labor dystocia. Such findings suggest that intrapartum ultrasound may contribute in the categorization of the etiology of labor dystocia., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess whether the additional training with transabdominal ultrasound may improve the accuracy of the transvaginal digital examination in the assessment of the fetal head position during the active stage of labor., Methods: Prospective observational study involving 2 residents in their 1 st year of training in Obstetrics with no prior experience in neither transvaginal digital examination nor ultrasound. Women with term, cephalic presenting fetus and active labor with cervical dilation ≥ 8 cm and ruptured membranes were included. In the preliminary phase of the study, the resident A ("blinded") was assigned to assess the fetal head position by transvaginal digital examination, while the resident B ("unmasked") performed transvaginal digital examination following transabdominal ultrasound, which was considered to be the gold standard to determine the fetal head position. After 50 examinations independently performed by each resident in the training phase, a post-training phase of the study was carried out to compare the accuracy of each resident in the diagnosis of fetal head position by digital assessment. The occiput position was eventually confirmed by ultrasound performed by the main investigator., Results: Over a 6 months period, 90 post-training vaginal examinations were performed by each resident. The number of incorrect diagnoses of head position was higher for the "blinded" resident compared with the "unmasked" resident subjected to the ultrasound training (28/90 or 31.1 % vs 15/90 or 16.7 % p = 0.02). For both residents a wrong diagnosis was more likely with non-OA vs OA fetuses but this difference was statistically significant for the "blinded" Resident (10/20 or 50 % vs 18/70 or 25.7 % p = 0.039) but not for the "unmasked" Resident (5/18 or 27.9 % vs 10/72 or 13.9 % p = 0.16)., Conclusion: The addition of transabdominal ultrasound as a training tool in the determination of the fetal head position during labor seems to improve the accuracy of the transvaginal digital examination in unexperienced residents., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The "Fetal Brain Tutor 4us" (FBTApp) is a recently developed application for interactive multiplanar navigation through the normal fetal brain. The purpose of this work was to assess its impact on normal anatomy learning., Methods: A multiple-choice quiz (MCQ) was administered to first-year resident doctors in Obstetrics and Gynecology in two separate sessions, before and 2 weeks after downloading the FBTApp. For each MCQ, the junior trainee was asked to use one out of five items to label a specific cerebral structure on an ultrasound image of a normal midtrimester fetal brain. Six sonographic images of the fetal brain on each of the three scanning planes (axial, sagittal, and coronal) were shown to the participants at either session. The results of the two sessions were analysed and compared., Results: Overall, 216 questions were administered to the trainees in the 2-week study, 108 before and 108 after the use of the FBTApp. From the first to the second sessions, a significant increase of correct answers was noted (from 47/108 or 43% to 77/108 or 71%, P < 0.01). Particularly, a better improvement was obtained in the correct labelling of cerebral structures on the nonaxial (from 32% to 67%, +35%) vs axial (from 67% to 81%, +14%) view planes of the brain (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: The use of FBTApp seems capable to improve the knowledge of the normal fetal brain anatomy in subjects naive to dedicated prenatal ultrasound. This improvement seems greater on nonaxial planes., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

The antenatal evaluation of the fetal central nervous system (CNS) is among the most difficult tasks of prenatal ultrasound (US), requiring technical skills in relation to ultrasound and image acquisition as well as knowledge of CNS anatomy and how this changes with gestation. According to the International Guidelines for fetal neurosonology, the basic assessment of fetal CNS is most frequently performed on the axial planes, whereas the coronal and sagittal planes are required for the multiplanar evaluation of the CNS within the context of fetal neurosonology. It can be even more technically challenging to obtain "nonaxial" views with 2-dimensional (2D) US. The modality of 3-dimensional (3D) US has been suggested as a panacea to overcome the technical difficulties of achieving nonaxial views. The lack of familiarity of most sonologists with the use of 3D US and its related processing techniques may preclude its use even where it could play an important role in complementing antenatal 2D US assessment. Furthermore, once a 3D volume has been acquired, proprietary software allows it to be processed in different ways, leading to multiple ways of displaying and analyzing the same anatomical imaging or plane. These are difficult to learn and time consuming in the absence of specific training. In this article, we describe the key steps for volume acquisition of a 3D US volume, manipulation, and processing with reference to images of the fetal CNS, using a newly developed context-preserving rendering technique., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The antenatal detection of facial dysmorphism using 3-dimensional ultrasound may raise the suspicion of an underlying genetic condition but infrequently leads to a definitive antenatal diagnosis. Despite advances in array and noninvasive prenatal testing, not all genetic conditions can be ascertained from such testing., Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of quantitative assessment of fetal face features using prenatal 3-dimensional ultrasound volumes and statistical shape modeling. STUDY DESIGN: Thirteen normal and 7 abnormal stored 3-dimensional ultrasound fetal face volumes were analyzed, at a median gestation of 29 +4  weeks (25 +0 to 36 +1 ). The 20 3-dimensional surface meshes generated were aligned and served as input for a statistical shape model, which computed the mean 3-dimensional face shape and 3-dimensional shape variations using principal component analysis., Results: Ten shape modes explained more than 90% of the total shape variability in the population. While the first mode accounted for overall size differences, the second highlighted shape feature changes from an overall proportionate toward a more asymmetric face shape with a wide prominent forehead and an undersized, posteriorly positioned chin. Analysis of the Mahalanobis distance in principal component analysis shape space suggested differences between normal and abnormal fetuses (median and interquartile range distance values, 7.31 ± 5.54 for the normal group vs 13.27 ± 9.82 for the abnormal group) (P = .056)., Conclusion: This feasibility study demonstrates that objective characterization and quantification of fetal facial morphology is possible from 3-dimensional ultrasound. This technique has the potential to assist in utero diagnosis, particularly of rare conditions in which facial dysmorphology is a feature., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Placental insufficiency is associated with reduced oxygen and nutrient supply to the fetus, which may result in fetal growth restriction (FGR). In an attempt to cope with the hostile intrauterine environment, FGR fetuses respond through metabolic, endocrine, vascular, cardiac, behavioral, hematological, and immunological adaptive mechanisms. However, permanent sequelae may result from such adaptive mechanisms. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of fetal adaptation to the hostile intrauterine environment in FGR of uteroplacental origin and detail their pathophysiology and potential implications for the extrauterine life of the individual. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Fetal overgrowth is an acknowledged risk factor for abnormal labor course and maternal and perinatal complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of antenatal ultrasound-based customized fetal growth charts in fetuses at risk for large-for-gestational age (LGA) allows a better identification of cases undergoing caesarean section due to intrapartum dystocia.Material and Methods: An observational study involving four Italian tertiary centers was carried out. Women referred to a dedicated antenatal clinic between 35 and 38 weeks due to an increased risk of having an LGA fetus at birth were prospectively selected for the study purpose. The fetal measurements obtained and used for the estimation of the fetal size were biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length, were prospectively collected. LGA fetuses were defined by estimated fetal weight (EFW) >95th centile either using the standard charts implemented by the World Health Organization (WHO) or the customized fetal growth charts previously published by our group. Patients scheduled for elective caesarean section (CS) or for elective induction for suspected fetal macrosomia or submitted to CS or vacuum extraction (VE) purely due to suspected intrapartum distress were excluded. The incidence of CS due to labor dystocia was compared between fetuses with EFW >95th centile according WHO or customized antenatal growth charts.Results: Overall, 814 women were eligible, however 562 were considered for the data analysis following the evaluation of the exclusion criteria. Vaginal delivery occurred in 466 (82.9 %) women (435 (77.4 %) spontaneous vaginal delivery and 31 (5.5 %) VE) while 96 had CS. The EFW was >95th centile in 194 (34.5 %) fetuses according to WHO growth charts and in 190 (33.8 %) by customized growth charts, respectively. CS due to dystocia occurred in 43 (22.2 %) women with LGA fetuses defined by WHO curves and in 39 (20.5 %) women with LGA defined by customized growth charts (p 0.70). WHO curves showed 57 % sensitivity, 72 % specificity, 24 % PPV and 91 % NPV, while customized curves showed 52 % sensitivity, 73 % specificity, 23 % PPV and 91 % NPV for CS due to labor dystocia.Conclusions: The use of antenatal ultrasound-based customized growth charts does not allow a better identification of fetuses at risk of CS due to intrapartum dystocia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the cardiotocography (CTG) features observed in suspected intrapartum chorioamnionitis in term fetuses according to the recently suggested criteria for the pathophysiological interpretation of the fetal heart rate and their correlation with perinatal outcomes. Methods: Retrospective analysis of nonconsecutive CTG traces. 'CTG chorioamnionitis' was diagnosed either based on a persistent rise in the baseline for the given gestation or on a persistent increase in the baseline fetal heart rate during labor >10% without preceding CTG signs of hypoxia and in the absence of maternal pyrexia. Perinatal outcomes were compared among cases with no sign of chorioamnionitis, in those with only CTG features suspicious for chorioamnionitis and in those who developed clinical chorioamnionitis. Results: Two thousand one hundred and five CTG traces were analyzed. Of these, 356 fulfilled the criteria for "CTG chorioamnionitis". Higher rates of Apgar <7 at 1 and 5 min (21.6% vs 9.0% and 9.8% vs 2.0%, respectively, P < 0.01 for both) and lower umbilical artery pH (7.14 ± 0.11 vs 7.19 ± 0.11, P < 0.01) and an over fivefold higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (16.6% vs 2.9%, P < 0.01) were noted in the 'CTG chorioamnionitis' group. Differences in the incidence of abnormal CTG patterns were noted between cases who eventually had clinical evidence of chorioamnionitis (89/356) and those showing CTG features suspicious for chorioamnionitis in the absence of clinical evidence of chorioamnionitis (267/356). Conclusion: Intrapartum CTG features of suspected chorioamnionitis are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]