Search

2D materials offer a pathway for further scaling of CMOS technology. However, for this to become a reality, both n-MOS and p-MOS should be realized, ideally with the same (standard) material. In the specific case of MoS2 field effect transistors (FETs), ambipolar transport is seldom reported, primarily due to the phenomenon of Fermi level pinning (FLP). In this study we identify the possible sources of FLP in MoS2 FETs and resolve them individually. A novel contact transfer technique is used to transfer contacts on top of MoS2 flake devices that results in a significant increase in the hole branch of the transfer characteristics as compared to conventionally fabricated contacts. We hypothesize that the pinning not only comes from the contact-MoS2 interface, but also from the MoS2-substrate interface. We confirm this by shifting to an hBN substrate which leads to a 10 fold increase in the hole current compared to the SiO2 substrate. Furthermore, we analyse MoS2 FETs of different channel thickness on three different substrates, SiO2, hBN and Al2O3, by correlating the p-branch ION/IOFF to the position of oxide defect band in these substrates. FLP from the oxide is reduced in the case of Al2O3 which enables us to observe ambipolar transport in a bilayer MoS2 FET. These results highlight that MoS2 is indeed an ambipolar material, and the absence of ambipolar transport in MoS2 FETs is strongly correlated to its dielectric environment and processing conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

2-D material FETs hold the promise of excellent gate control, but the impact of nonidealities on their performance remains poorly understood. This is because of the need, so far, to use computationally intensive nonequilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) simulations. Here, we therefore use a semiclassical model to investigate the role of nonidealities in the scaling of back-gated (BG) and top-gated (TG) monolayer MoS2 FETs. We verify the electrostatics and transport of the semiclassical model with density functional theory-based NEGF simulations and calibrate nonidealities, such as interface traps (${D}_{\textsf {it}}$) and Schottky contact barrier height ($\phi _{\textsf {SB}}$) to experimental monolayer and bilayer MoS2 FETs. We find that among the nonidealities, ${D}_{\textsf {it}}$ has the strongest subthreshold swing impact with 70 mV/dec obtainable in BG devices for a ${D}_{\textsf {it}}$ of $5\times {10}^{11}$ cm−2eV $^{-1}$ , an equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) of 1 nm, and a channel length (${L}_{\textsf {ch}}$) of 5 nm. For scaled EOT, $\phi _{\textsf {SB}}$ only strongly impacts ${I}_{ \mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle ON}}$ for the TG case, as the overlapping gate thins the Schottky barriers in the BG case. We show in TG devices that a spacer of only 5 nm results in a 1000-fold drop in ${I}_{ \mathrm{\scriptscriptstyle ON}}$ because of the nonidealities. We propose positive spacer oxide charge as a solution and show that a charge density of above 1013 cm−2 is required to fully recover the device performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultra-thin MoS2 film doping through surface functionalization with physically adsorbed species is of great interest due to its ability to dope the film without reduction in the carrier mobility. However, there is a need for understanding how the thickness of the MoS2 film is related to the induced surface doping for improved electrical performance. In this work, we report on the relation of MoS2 film thickness with the doping effect induced by the n-dopant adsorbate poly(vinyl-alcohol). Field effect transistors built using MoS2 films of different thicknesses were electrically characterized, and it was observed that the ION/OFF ratio after doping in thin films is more than four orders of magnitudes greater when compared with thick films. Additionally, a semi-classical model tuned with the experimental devices was used to understand the spatial distribution of charge in the channel and explain the observed behavior. From the simulation results, it was revealed that the two-dimensional carrier density induced by the adsorbate is distributed rather uniformly along the complete channel for thin films (<5.2 nm) contrary to what happens for thicker films. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]