Search

Introduction: Data from the United States have shown that finger replantation numbers have declined significantly in recent years. It is unclear whether this is due to a decrease in amputation injuries or other reasons., Materials Methods: Since 2005, all German hospitals have been required to produce structured quality reports. Based on these reports, we analyzed finger and hand replantation development and the incidence of amputation injuries between 2006 and 2018., Results: Replantations decreased by 30%, whereas amputation injuries increased slightly. In 2018, only 17 centers carried out more than 10 replantations. Most hospitals had replanted less than 4 times a year. The majority of residents participated in fewer than 1 replantation per year. Most specialists performed fewer than 1 replantation per year. The reasons for the decline in replantation remain speculative., Conclusions: However, a reduction in amputation injuries was not observed. A change in medical indications, technical skills, and economic motivations needs to be considered. A further loss of specialized technical skills and experience with replantations might be a future consequence of this trend., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: None of the authors have any conflict of interest. This study received no specific financial support from a public, commercial, or nonprofit financing agency., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There are many types of intrinsic flaps to cover wound defects on the hand, which have been well described in scientific literature. However, the donor sites are often neglected in such studies. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate donor site morbidity for homodigital island flaps, cross-finger flaps, Foucher's pedicle flaps, and flaps of the dorsal metacarpal artery system (DMCA)., Materials and Methods: A total of 106 intrinsic flap procedures were performed on 106 patients (16 women, 90 men). The donor sites were retrospectively followed up after an average of 3.4 years by a questionnaire, a Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and clinical examination. Donor sites of different flap types were compared for aesthetic outcome, trophic level, and sensation, including 2-point discrimination, temperature, sharp/dull discrimination, the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, pain (visual analog scale), and functionality., Results: In general, primarily closed donor sites showed more favorable results than did grafted donor sites. Satisfaction among patients regarding aesthetics of the donor site was highest in patients who had received homodigital island flaps. Grip strength and pain at the operated hand were very heterogeneous and rather influenced by the primary trauma than the type of flap. Homodigital island flap donor sites demonstrated the best results for 2-point discrimination and sharp/dull discrimination, and those for DMCA flaps in the Semes-Weinstein test., Conclusions: Overall, intrinsic flaps demonstrated low donor site morbidity with reliable coverage of the defects. Of these, the DMCA (especially after primary closure) and homodigital island flaps seemed to produce the best donor site results., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)