Search

Lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) can require revision surgery because of the intervertebral instability after decompression. However, there is a lack of mechanical analyses for decompression procedures for LSS with DISH. This study used a validated, three-dimensional finite element model of an L1-L5 lumbar spine, L1-L4 DISH, pelvis, and femurs to compare the biomechanical parameters (range of motion [ROM], intervertebral disc, hip joint, and instrumentation stresses) with an L5-sacrum (L5-S) and L4-S posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). A pure moment with a compressive follower load was applied to these models. ROM of L5-S and L4-S PLIF models decreased by more than 50% at L4-L5, respectively, and decreased by more than 15% at L1-S compared with the DISH model in all motions. The L4-L5 nucleus stress of the L5-S PLIF increased by more than 14% compared with the DISH model. In all motions, the hip stress of DISH, L5-S, and L4-S PLIF had very small differences. The sacroiliac joint stress of L5-S and L4-S PLIF models decreased by more than 15% compared with the DISH model. The stress values of the screws and rods in the L4-S PLIF model was higher than in the L5-S PLIF model. The concentration of stress because of DISH may influence adjacent segment disease on the nonunited segment of PLIF. A shorter-level lumbar interbody fixation is recommended to preserve ROM; however, it should be used with caution because it could provoke adjacent segment disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are several techniques for lumbar interbody fusion, and implant failure following lumbar interbody fusion can be troublesome. This study aimed to compare the stress in posterior implant and peri-screw vertebral bodies among lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to select the technique that is least likely to cause implant failure. We created an intact L3–L5 model and simulated the LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF techniques at L4–L5 using finite element methods. All models at the lower portion of L5 were fixed and imposed a preload of 400 N and a moment of 7.5 Nm on the upper portion of L3 to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. We investigated the peak stresses and stress concentration in the posterior implant and peri-screw vertebral bodies for the LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF techniques. The extension, flexion, bending, and rotation peak stresses and stress concentration in the posterior implant, as well as the peri-screw vertebral bodies, were the lowest in LLIF, followed by PLIF and TLIF. It was found that implant failure was least likely to occur in LLIF, followed by PLIF and TLIF. Hence, surgeons should be aware of these factors when selecting an appropriate surgical technique and be careful for implant failure during postoperative follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We proposed a novel surface modification for an artificial hip joint stem from the viewpoint of maintenance and establishment of appropriate bone function and microstructure, represented by the preferred alignment of biological apatite (BAp) and collagen (Col). Oriented grooves were introduced into the proximal medial region of the femoral stem to control the principal stress applied to the bone inside the grooves, which is a dominant factor contributing to the promotion of Col/BAp alignment. The groove angle and the stem material were optimized based on the stress inside the grooves through a finite element analysis (FEA). Only the groove oriented proximally by 60° from the normal direction of the stem surface generated the healthy maximum principal stress distribution. The magnitude of the maximum principal stress inside the groove decreased with increasing the stem Young''s modulus, while the direction of the stress did not largely changed. An in vivo implantation experiment showed that this groove was effective in inducing the new bone with preferential Col/BAp alignment along the groove depth direction which corresponded to the direction of maximum principal stress inside the groove. The anisotropic principal stress distribution and the oriented microstructure inside the groove are similar to those found in the femoral trabeculae; therefore, the creation of the oriented groove is a potent surface modification for optimizing implant design for a long-term fixation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]