Search

Background: Intermediate vertebral collapse is a newly discovered complication of consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There have been no analytical studies related to the effects of endplate defects on the biomechanics of the intermediate vertebral bone after ACDF. This study aimed to compare the effects of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone biomechanics in the zero-profile (ZP) and cage-and-plate (CP) methods of consecutive 2-level ACDF and to determine whether collapse of the intermediate vertebra is more likely to occur using ZP. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the intact cervical spine (C2–T1) was constructed and validated. The intact FE model was then modified to build ACDF models and imitate the situation of endplate injury, establishing two groups of models (ZP, IM-ZP and CP, IM-ZP). We simulated cervical motion, such as flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, and compared the range of motion (ROM), upper and lower endplate stress, fusion fixation device stress, C5 vertebral body stress, intervertebral disc internal pressure (intradiscal pressure, or IDP) and the ROM of adjacent segments in the models. Results: There was no significant difference between the IM-CP model and the CP model in the ROM of the surgical segment, upper and lower endplate stress, fusion fixation device stress, C5 vertebral body stress, IDP, or ROM of the adjacent segments. Compared with the CP model, the endplate stress of the ZP model is significantly higher in the flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation conditions. Compared with the ZP model, endplate stress, screw stress, C5 vertebral stress and IDP in IM-ZP were significantly increased under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation conditions. Conclusions: Compared to consecutive 2-level ACDF using CP, collapse of the intermediate vertebra is more likely to occur using ZP due to its mechanical characteristics. Intraoperative endplate defects of the anterior lower margin of the middle vertebra are a risk factor leading to collapse of the middle vertebra after consecutive 2-level ACDF using ZP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The injury of the annular ligament can change the stress distribution and affect the stability of the elbow joint, but its biomechanical mechanism is unclear. The present study investigated the biomechanical effects of different flexion angles of the annular ligament on elbow joint stability. Methods: A cartilage and ligament model was constructed using SolidWorks software according to the magnetic resonance imaging results to simulate the annular ligament during normal, loosened, and ruptured conditions at different buckling angles (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°). The fixed muscle strengths were 40 N (F1), 20 N (F2), 20 N (F3), 20 N (F4), and 20 N (F5) for the triceps, biceps, and brachial tendons and the base of the medial collateral ligament and lateral collateral ligament. The different elbow three‐dimensional (3D) finite element models were imported into ABAQUS software to calculate and analyze the load, contact area, contact stress, and stress of the medial collateral ligament of the olecranon cartilage. Results: The results showed that the stress value of olecranon cartilage increased under different conditions (normal, loosened, and ruptured annular ligament) with elbow extension, and the maximum stress value of olecranon cartilage was 2.91 ± 0.24 MPa when the annular ligament was ruptured. The maximum contact area of olecranon cartilage was 254 mm2 with normal annular ligament when the elbow joint was flexed to 30°, while the maximum contact area of loosened and ruptured annular ligament was 283 and 312 mm2 at 60° of elbow flexion, and then decreased gradually. The maximum stress of the medial collateral ligament was 6.52 ± 0.23, 11.51 ± 0.78, and 18.74 ± 0.94 MPa under the different conditions, respectively. Conclusion: When the annular ligament ruptures, it should be reconstructed as much as possible to avoid the elevation of stress on the surface of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow and the annular cartilage, which may cause clinical symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Focusing on nonlinear static-dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI). • SSSI is dominated by ground motion, structure spacing and number of structures. • SSSI significantly changes seismic response of inter-story drift. • SSSI increases the seismic response near the second natural period of the building. • SSSI significantly changes the peak shear force at the top of the pile foundation. Based on the 1–3 identical high-rise buildings with pile-raft foundation, a series of building-site two-dimensional finite element analysis models with different building spacings is established. Then, considering the nonlinear characteristics of soil and structure, the static-dynamic coupled numerical simulations are conducted to study the structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI) under different ground motion. The results show that: 1) Adjacent high-rise buildings have the most unfavorable impact on the peak acceleration of the 1/4–1/2 height floors of the middle building, and increase the normalized response acceleration spectra value of acceleration near the second natural period of the structure; 2) Adjacent high-rise buildings have the most significant impact on the inter-story drift of the top, bottom and basement of the middle building; 3) Adjacent high-rise buildings redistribute the total horizontal shear force of the pile top of the middle building among the pile foundations, so that the peak value of the pile top shear force of each pile changes significantly, which is extremely unfavorable to the seismic safety of the structure. It should be taken seriously in the seismic design of structures. In addition, the structure spacing that results in favorable or unfavorable effects is discussed, and the reasons for the impact are analyzed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]