4 results on '"Aquilué, Núria"'
Search Results
2. Tree species persistence under warming conditions: A key driver of forest response to climate change.
- Author
-
Bouchard, Mathieu, Aquilué, Núria, Périé, Catherine, and Lambert, Marie-Claude
- Subjects
FOREST microclimatology ,CLIMATE change ,FOREST management ,FOREST dynamics ,TEMPERATE forests ,FIRE - Abstract
Highlights • Simulations indicate that climate change will impact future tree species distributions. • Results are highly sensitive to parameters controlling tree persistence under warmer climate conditions. • Results are less sensitive to disturbance regimes (fire and harvesting) and tree dispersal limitations. Abstract From a forest management stand point, it is crucial to know which ecological processes are most likely to drive changes in tree species distributions and abundance under warming climate conditions. In this study, we simulated forest dynamics in a 703,580 km
2 territory that straddles the boreal and temperate broadleaved forest biomes in the province of Québec (Canada), under a RCP 8.5 climate change scenario. The objective was to evaluate how future forest composition is sensitive to variation in four potential drivers: fire regimes, harvesting regimes, the capacity of tree species to persist under warmer climate conditions, and species capabilities for long-distance colonization. The results indicate that forest composition in 2100 is most sensitive to variation in the parameters controlling species persistence when conditions become warmer or dryer than the conditions found in their current range. Concretely, this points to avenues of research to improve the accuracy of our predictions regarding the impacts of climate change on forest composition. For instance, we should further investigate the underlying ecological (competition) or physiological (drought stresses) processes that influence tree species persistence at the receding edge of their current distributions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. How fire interacts with habitat loss and fragmentation.
- Author
-
Driscoll, Don A., Armenteras, Dolors, Bennett, Andrew F., Brotons, Lluís, Clarke, Michael F., Doherty, Tim S., Haslem, Angie, Kelly, Luke T., Sato, Chloe F., Sitters, Holly, Aquilué, Núria, Bell, Kristian, Chadid, Maria, Duane, Andrea, Meza‐Elizalde, María C., Giljohann, Katherine M., González, Tania Marisol, Jambhekar, Ravi, Lazzari, Juliana, and Morán‐Ordóñez, Alejandra
- Subjects
FRAGMENTED landscapes ,FIRE ecology ,FOREST fire ecology ,ENDANGERED species ,ANIMAL species ,SPECIES diversity ,PLANT species - Abstract
Biodiversity faces many threats and these can interact to produce outcomes that may not be predicted by considering their effects in isolation. Habitat loss and fragmentation (hereafter 'fragmentation') and altered fire regimes are important threats to biodiversity, but their interactions have not been systematically evaluated across the globe. In this comprehensive synthesis, including 162 papers which provided 274 cases, we offer a framework for understanding how fire interacts with fragmentation. Fire and fragmentation interact in three main ways: (i) fire influences fragmentation (59% of 274 cases), where fire either destroys and fragments habitat or creates and connects habitat; (ii) fragmentation influences fire (25% of cases) where, after habitat is reduced in area and fragmented, fire in the landscape is subsequently altered because people suppress or ignite fires, or there is increased edge flammability or increased obstruction to fire spread; and (iii) where the two do not influence each other, but fire interacts with fragmentation to affect responses like species richness, abundance and extinction risk (16% of cases). Where fire and fragmentation do influence each other, feedback loops are possible that can lead to ecosystem conversion (e.g. forest to grassland). This is a well‐documented threat in the tropics but with potential also to be important elsewhere. Fire interacts with fragmentation through scale‐specific mechanisms: fire creates edges and drives edge effects; fire alters patch quality; and fire alters landscape‐scale connectivity. We found only 12 cases in which studies reported the four essential strata for testing a full interaction, which were fragmented and unfragmented landscapes that both span contrasting fire histories, such as recently burnt and long unburnt vegetation. Simulation and empirical studies show that fire and fragmentation can interact synergistically, multiplicatively, antagonistically or additively. These cases highlight a key reason why understanding interactions is so important: when fire and fragmentation act together they can cause local extinctions, even when their separate effects are neutral. Whether fire–fragmentation interactions benefit or disadvantage species is often determined by the species' preferred successional stage. Adding fire to landscapes generally benefits early‐successional plant and animal species, whereas it is detrimental to late‐successional species. However, when fire interacts with fragmentation, the direction of effect of fire on a species could be reversed from the effect expected by successional preferences. Adding fire to fragmented landscapes can be detrimental for species that would normally co‐exist with fire, because species may no longer be able to disperse to their preferred successional stage. Further, animals may be attracted to particular successional stages leading to unexpected responses to fragmentation, such as higher abundance in more isolated unburnt patches. Growing human populations and increasing resource consumption suggest that fragmentation trends will worsen over coming years. Combined with increasing alteration of fire regimes due to climate change and human‐caused ignitions, interactions of fire with fragmentation are likely to become more common. Our new framework paves the way for developing a better understanding of how fire interacts with fragmentation, and for conserving biodiversity in the face of these emerging challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. How Fire History, Fire Suppression Practices and Climate Change Affect Wildfire Regimes in Mediterranean Landscapes
- Author
-
Brotons, Lluís, Aquilué, Núria, de Cáceres, Miquel, Fortin, Marie-Josée, and Fall, Andrew
- Subjects
- *
CLIMATE change , *WILDFIRES , *MEDITERRANEAN climate , *COMPUTATIONAL biology , *CARTOGRAPHY , *FIRE , *HUMAN geography , *GEOGRAPHIC spatial analysis - Abstract
Available data show that future changes in global change drivers may lead to an increasing impact of fires on terrestrial ecosystems worldwide. Yet, fire regime changes in highly humanised fire-prone regions are difficult to predict because fire effects may be heavily mediated by human activities We investigated the role of fire suppression strategies in synergy with climate change on the resulting fire regimes in Catalonia (north-eastern Spain). We used a spatially-explicit fire-succession model at the landscape level to test whether the use of different firefighting opportunities related to observed reductions in fire spread rates and effective fire sizes, and hence changes in the fire regime. We calibrated this model with data from a period with weak firefighting and later assess the potential for suppression strategies to modify fire regimes expected under different levels of climate change. When comparing simulations with observed fire statistics from an eleven-year period with firefighting strategies in place, our results showed that, at least in two of the three sub-regions analysed, the observed fire regime could not be reproduced unless taking into account the effects of fire suppression. Fire regime descriptors were highly dependent on climate change scenarios, with a general trend, under baseline scenarios without fire suppression, to large-scale increases in area burnt. Fire suppression strategies had a strong capacity to compensate for climate change effects. However, strong active fire suppression was necessary to accomplish such compensation, while more opportunistic fire suppression strategies derived from recent fire history only had a variable, but generally weak, potential for compensation of enhanced fire impacts under climate change. The concept of fire regime in the Mediterranean is probably better interpreted as a highly dynamic process in which the main determinants of fire are rapidly modified by changes in landscape, climate and socioeconomic factors such as fire suppression strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.