Search

Autumn grazing of high-yielding forage crops such as fodder beet (FB) has increased in popularity in many regions of New Zealand. During grazing, large amounts of urinary nitrogen (N) is returned to the soil which is at risk of leaching. This study evaluated using two different catch crops of oats or Italian ryegrass ('Italian RG') to reduce the risk of N leaching both after FB grazing by lactating dairy cows and after lifting (i.e. un-grazed FB) in autumn. During FB grazing, cows grazed either (i) high [40% of diet dry matter (DM), with pasture; FB40] or (ii) low (25% of diet DM, with pasture; FB25) FB allocations. Both Italian RG and oats reduced soil mineral N (0–90 cm depth) by 16%–37% by August, and 53%–58% by October, compared with a fallow control (115 and 100 kg N ha−1 for August and October, respectively). The greatest reductions in soil mineral N were from oats, largely attributed to higher DM yields resulting in greater N uptake. Furthermore, the total amounts of soil mineral N in the soil after grazing differed between FB allocation treatments and lifted FB (FB25 > FB40 > lifted FB), in proportion to urinary-N inputs and associated dietary N intake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nitrate leaching from soil is a major problem in New Zealand pastoral systems, requiring development of practical methods to manage accumulation of nitrates. Nine feed trials were carried out in the Waikato (n = 3) and in Canterbury (n = 6) between 2013 and 2016; from which 424 samples were selected for forage quality testing. Only tick beans and forage rape met the lactating feed criteria for adequate crude protein (CP; > 16% DM) and soluble sugars and starch (SSS; > 25% DM). When an 'environmental' criterion was added to a feed value for lactating cows this reduced the options to fodder beet only. However, the CP measurements for fodder beet were suboptimal for milk production, requiring the fodder beet to be mixed with high protein feeds such as pasture or pasture silage. The lower protein requirements for non-lactating cows, including an additive environmental criterion enabled a wider range of feeds to be considered e.g. kale, sunflowers and swedes in Canterbury (12 entries) and fodder beet and rape in the Waikato (21 entries). Addition or restriction of nitrogen fertiliser was the only agronomic management intervention that consistently altered animal feed quality and potentially changed N excretion. Crop choice was likely to have the greatest impact at the farm level. By limiting feed quality assessment to CP, SSS and their ratio (SSS:CP) we were able to define a selection/feed monitoring method to minimise N content of feed, maximise SSS feed value and limit excess N intake to reduce the nitrate leaching risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High yielding crops such as maize (Zea mays L.) and fodder beet (FB; Beta vulgaris L), are commonly used to extend lactation and increase animal productivity from pastoral dairy systems. Financial modelling to compare costs and benefits of different crops is useful for decision making, but such modelling often fails to account for potential animal health risks which can be associated with feeding supplements. A multi-component, whole-farm modelling approach was used to predict milk solids (MS, milk fat + protein) production and the economic farm surplus (EFS: operating surplus – adjustments) between 2016 and 2018 for an irrigated farm in Canterbury (South Island) and a non-irrigated farm in the Waikato (North Island), of New Zealand. The financial risk of the dairy business was measured using the ratio between mean return on assets (ROA) minus an assumed 5% risk-free ROA, and the standard deviation of ROA was calculated from 300 combinations of climate, milk, and feed price, land appreciation, and interest rate. Four scenarios of autumn and spring supplementation of pasture were considered at each geographical location; imported maize silage (Base), a crop of maize silage grown on the milking platform (MSC; area used to produce milk), a crop of FB grown on the milking platform (FBC), and a FB crop with an outbreak of acute (1% stock fatality) and subacute ruminal acidosis (5% decline of feed intake) across the entire herd (FBAC). The MSC scenario improved EFS by 5.8% compared with Base in both the irrigated and the dryland system. The predicted response to MSC reflected greater milk production, lower feed expenses, and shorter crop rotation, compared with either Base, FBC, or FBAC. While FBC increased EFS by 4.8% compared with Base under irrigation, EFS was similar to Base under dryland conditions ($2711 and $2759/ha, respectively). The limited advantage of growing FB under dryland conditions reflect reduced herbage supply due to the extended crop duration of FB compared with maize silage. Model predictions suggest that FBAC will increase the financial risk by reducing milk production and EFS by 6.5% (irrigated) and 7.1% (dryland) compared with Base. In the absence of any adverse health risks, farm performance from the FBC scenario was comparable to that of MSC under irrigated conditions. However, in dryland conditions, and when the potential economic cost of acute and sub-acute ruminal acidosis is considered, there is little advantage to growing FB on the milking platform. • There is limited economic advantage to growing fodder beet to support lactation. • Risk exposure to fodder beet crop increased under dryland conditions. • System response to crop inclusion is dependent on commodities market and climate. • Profitability of fodder beet crop was reduced by ruminal acidosis. • Maize silage lowers cow health risk and is a competitive alternative to fodder beet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]