1. A comparative study of the volatile profile of wine vinegars with protected designation of origin by headspace stir bar sorptive extraction
- Author
-
Rocío Ríos-Reina, M. Pilar Segura-Borrego, Diego L. García-González, M. Lourdes Morales, Raquel M. Callejón, Junta de Andalucía, Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (España), and Universidad de Sevilla
- Subjects
Food Handling ,030309 nutrition & dietetics ,Wine ,Cyclohexane Monoterpenes ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ,Cresols ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0404 agricultural biotechnology ,Furaldehyde ,Food science ,Acetic Acid ,Bicyclic Monoterpenes ,Volatile Organic Compounds ,0303 health sciences ,Eucalyptol ,Wine vinegar Protected designation of origin Volatile compounds Markers Multivariate curve resolution HSSE Classification ,Acetoin ,Volatile phenols ,Extraction (chemistry) ,Discriminant Analysis ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Ketones ,040401 food science ,Diacetyl ,Butyrates ,chemistry ,Camphene ,Wine vinegar ,Norisoprenoids ,Heptanol ,Food Science - Abstract
The characteristic volatile profile of the Spanish Vinagre de Jerez (VJ), Vinagre de Condado de Huelva (VC) and Vinagre de Montilla-Moriles (VMM) protected designation of origin (PDO) wine vinegars has been studied and compared for the first time by headspace stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HSSE-GC–MS). The possible markers of each category and PDO were assessed. Acetates were the majority group in all vinegars, while ketones, C13-norisoprenoids and volatile phenols showed significant differences between the three PDOs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), heatmap and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed. According to these results, 1-heptanol, methyl nonanoate, 2-methylbutanoic acid, 2,2,6-trimethyl-cyclohexanone, trans-2-decenal, eucalyptol and α-terpineol, were the most significant compounds for differentiating of VC, diacetyl and acetoin, ethyl 3-ethoxypropanoate, 2- and 3-heptanone, 2-methyl-1-hexadecanol, 1-octen-3-ol, p-Cresol and camphene for VMM; and β-damascenone, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, 3-heptanol, trans-2-hexen-1-ol and trans-2-hexen-1-yl acetate for VJ. Classification results showed that 100% of PDO samples were correctly classified, reaffirming the utility of the volatile profiles for classifying and authenticating wine vinegar PDOs., The authors would like to thank the Spanish Regulatory Councils of the wine vinegar PDOs for their invaluable help with the acquisition of the samples. This work was supported by “Consejería de Economía, Innovación y Ciencia, Junta de Andalucía” [P12-AGR-1601]; the FPU scholarship of “Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte” [FPU014/01247], and PIF scholarship of “I + D + i Universidad de Sevilla” [VI PPITUS 2017].
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF