Search

Medium to subseasonal hydrological forecasts contain more information relevant to water and environmental management tasks than climatological forecasts. However, extracting this information at the most appropriate level of accuracy and spatiotemporal resolution remains a difficulty. Many studies show that the skill of the extended range forecasts with daily resolution tends toward zero after 7-14 days for small mountainous catchments. Beyond that forecast horizon the application of highly sophisticated pre- and postprocessing methods generally produce limited gains. Consequently, current forecasting techniques cannot effectively represent forecast extremes at extended ranges such as anomalously high and low runoff or soil moisture. To tackle these deficiencies, this study analyzes the value of tercile forecasts for weekly aggregates of runoff and soil moisture forecasts available at a daily resolution for Switzerland. The forecasts are classified into three categories: below, above, and normal conditions, which are derived from long-term simulations and correspond approximately to climatological conditions. To achieve improved reliability and skill of the predicted tercile probabilities, a nonparametric probabilistic classification method has been tested. It is based on Gaussian process (GP), which is attractive in machine learning (ML) applications because of its ability to estimate the predictive uncertainty. The outcome of these postprocessed forecasts was compared to preprocessing methods where the meteorological predictions are statistically corrected before passing to the hydrological model. Our results indicate that tercile forecasts of weekly aggregates produce a suitable skill up to 3 weeks lead time using the preprocessed input and up to 4 weeks lead time using the GP method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Statistical postprocessing is applied in operational forecasting to correct systematic errors of numerical weather prediction models (NWP) and to automatically produce calibrated local forecasts for end-users. Postprocessing is particularly relevant in complex terrain, where even state-of-the-art high-resolution NWP systems cannot resolve many of the small-scale processes shaping local weather conditions. In addition, statistical postprocessing can also be used to combine forecasts from multiple NWP systems. Here we assess an ensemble model output statistics (EMOS) approach to produce seamless temperature forecasts based on a combination of short-term ensemble forecasts from a convection-permitting limited-area ensemble and a medium-range global ensemble forecasting model. We quantify the benefit of this approach compared to only postprocessing the high-resolution NWP. The multimodel EMOS approach (“mixed EMOS”) is able to improve forecasts by 30% with respect to direct model output from the high-resolution NWP. A detailed evaluation of mixed EMOS reveals that it outperforms either one of the single-model EMOS versions by 8%–12%. Temperature forecasts at valley locations profit in particular from the model combination. All forecast variants perform worst in winter (DJF); however, calibration and model combination improves forecast quality substantially. In addition to increasing skill as compared to single-model postprocessing, it also enables us to seamlessly combine multiple forecast sources with different time horizons (and horizontal resolutions) and thereby consolidates short-term to medium-range forecasting time horizons in one product without any user-relevant discontinuity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]