Search

Background: Federal regulation requires hospitals to present patients with a Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP) that contains all stipulated content items, is readable by patients, and posted on institutional web sites., Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether the NPP texts contain the required content, if readability is influenced by local literacy rates, and if readability or the presentation of NPP texts in other languages is influenced by local rates of English proficiency., Research Design: The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of the web sites of 115 hospitals selected from the US News and World Report list: Best Hospitals in America., Measures: English NPP texts were evaluated for 18 content items and readability using the Flesch-Kincaid scale, which assigns the minimal grade level required to read a text (range, 0-16)., Results: NPP texts were available for all hospitals (115 of 115). A Spanish-language NPP was available for 25% (29 of 115). All content items were evident in 76% (87 of 115) of hospitals' NPP texts. The average grade-level readability of NPP text was 12.3 (95% confidence interval, 12.0-12.7). Readability was not associated with the rate of local literacy (P = 0.07). Hospitals with a lower local rate of English proficiency had NPP texts that were more difficult to read (P = 0.03) and did not present NPP texts in other languages more frequently (P = 0.15)., Conclusions: Although NPP texts typically cover the stipulated content, they are written beyond the reading capacity of the majority of American adults. Explicit federal guidance is needed to help privacy lawyers draft NPP texts that are both comprehensive and comprehensible. The goals of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Privacy Rule cannot be met with NPP texts patients cannot decipher.

Background: The objective was to investigate how data on race and ethnicity are collected by hospitals reporting to the New Hampshire State Cancer Registry (NHSCR)., Method: NHSCR surveyed hospitals asking how information on race and ethnicity were collected. A review of relevant legal mandates and national guidelines was undertaken., Results: Many hospitals lack policies on collection, computer systems fail to support national guidelines, and staff rely on visual inspection., Conclusions: Hospital staffs are not now culturally equipped to collect race and ethnicity in a meaningful way. The numerator in cancer incidence rates is most likely not accurate and for some smaller populations very biased. A new framework is needed that takes into account the needs of the democracy.

What should healthcare facility security directors and administrators do when patients or employees are the victims of identity theft? Taking the right steps to safeguard personal data won't insulate your facility from ever having to deal with this growing crime but, says the author, it will reduce the opportunity and desire for a criminal to steal the data.

Objective: Record keeping contributes to the quality of health care in addition to fulfilling medicolegal and accreditation regulations. We conducted an audit of patient files in 15 public hospitals in Aquitaine to determine their compliance with national laws., Methods: One hundred patient files were randomly selected in each hospital. Their compliance with 18 criteria established in 1992 by the ANDEM was studied. These 18 criteria were updated in accordance with the latest decrees from the health ministry and precisely defined in order to achieve good reproducibility of the measurements., Results: Ten percent of the files fulfilled all 18 criteria. Each component of the record was correctly identified and the name of the general practitioner, admission documents, and delivery, anesthesia and transfusion records were almost always present. Surgery reports were found in 65 to 89% of the files. Low compliance with three criteria was observed: authorization to give health care to a minor (39 to 80% of the files), identification of the physician who prescribed the drugs during hospitalization (6 to 32%) and discharge prescription (42 to 95%). We also pinpointed problems concerning archiving and retrieval, especially concerning the results of complementary exams which were not necessarily stored with the patient files., Conclusion: This audit allowed us to define the first steps of a quality improvement project for patient records. We were able to deduct recommendations for analyzing compliance with legal requirements and suggest that the 1992 ANDEM criteria be updated to allow for valid comparisons between health care establishment.