Search

We study two fringe subtree counting statistics, the number of cherries and that of pitchforks for Ford's $\alpha$ model, a one-parameter family of random phylogenetic tree models that includes the uniform and the Yule models, two tree models commonly used in phylogenetics. Based on a nonuniform version of the extended P\'olya urn models in which negative entries are permitted for their replacement matrices, we obtain the strong law of large numbers and the central limit theorem for the joint distribution of these two count statistics for the Ford model. Furthermore, we derive a recursive formula for computing the exact joint distribution of these two statistics. This leads to exact formulas for their means and higher order asymptotic expansions of their second moments, which allows us to identify a critical parameter value for the correlation between these two statistics. That is, when $n$ is sufficiently large, they are negatively correlated for $0\le \alpha \le 1/2$ and positively correlated for $1/2, Comment: 23 pages, 2 figures

A rooted phylogenetic network is a directed acyclic graph with a single root, whose sinks correspond to a set of species. As such networks are useful for representing the evolution of species that have undergone reticulate evolution, there has been great interest in developing the theory behind and algorithms for constructing them. However, unlike evolutionary trees, these networks can be highly non-planar, which can make them difficult to visualise and interpret. Here we investigate properties of planar rooted phylogenetic networks and algorithms for deciding whether or not rooted networks have certain special planarity properties. In particular, we introduce three natural subclasses of planar rooted phylogenetic networks and show that they form a hierarchy. In addition, for the well-known level-k networks, we show that level-1, -2, -3 networks are always outer, terminal, and upward planar, respectively, and that level-4 networks are not necessarily planar. Finally, we show that a regular network is terminal planar if and only if it is pyramidal. Our results make use of the highly developed field of planar digraphs, and we believe that the link between phylogenetic networks and planar graphs should prove useful in future for developing new approaches to both construct and visualise phylogenetic networks., 11 pages

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary or phylogenetic trees that are commonly used to represent the evolution of species which cross with one another. A special type of phylogenetic network is an {\em $X$-cactus}, which is essentially a cactus graph in which all vertices with degree less than three are labelled by at least one element from a set $X$ of species. In this paper, we present a way to {\em encode} $X$-cactuses in terms of certain collections of partitions of $X$ that naturally arise from $X$-cactuses. Using this encoding, we also introduce a partial order on the set of $X$-cactuses (up to isomorphism), and derive some structural properties of the resulting partially ordered set. This includes an analysis of some properties of its least upper and greatest lower bounds. Our results not only extend some fundamental properties of phylogenetic trees to $X$-cactuses, but also provides a new approach to solving topical problems in phylogenetic network theory such as deriving consensus networks.

Tree shape statistics are important for investigating evolutionary mechanisms mediating phylogenetic trees. As a step towards bridging shape statistics between rooted and unrooted trees, we present a comparison study on two subtree statistics known as numbers of cherries and pitchforks for the proportional to distinguishable arrangements (PDA) and the Yule-Harding-Kingman (YHK) models. Based on recursive formulas on the joint distribution of the number of cherries and that of pitchforks, it is shown that cherry distributions are log-concave for both rooted and unrooted trees under these two models. Furthermore, the mean number of cherries and that of pitchforks for unrooted trees converge respectively to those for rooted trees under the YHK model while there exists a limiting gap of 1/4 for the PDA model. Finally, the total variation distances between the cherry distributions of rooted and those of unrooted trees converge for both models. Our results indicate that caution is required for conducting statistical analysis for tree shapes involving both rooted and unrooted trees., Comment: 26 pages

UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) is a widely used clustering method. Here we show that UPGMA is a greedy heuristic for the normalized equidistant minimum evolution (NEME) problem, that is, finding a rooted tree that minimizes the minimum evolution score relative to the dissimilarity matrix among all rooted trees with the same leaf-set in which all leaves have the same distance to the root. We prove that the NEME problem is NP-hard. In addition, we present some heuristic and approximation algorithms for solving the NEME problem, including a polynomial time algorithm that yields a binary, rooted tree whose NEME score is within O(log^2 n) of the optimum. We expect that these results to eventually provide further insights into the behavior of the UPGMA algorithm., Comment: 29 pages, 8 figures

An important problem in phylogenetics is the construction of phylogenetic trees. One way to approach this problem, known as the supertree method, involves inferring a phylogenetic tree with leaves consisting of a set $X$ of species from a collection of trees, each having leaf-set some subset of $X$. In the 1980's characterizations, certain inference rules were given for when a collection of 4-leaved trees, one for each 4-element subset of $X$, can all be simultaneously displayed by a single supertree with leaf-set $X$. Recently, it has become of interest to extend such results to phylogenetic networks. These are a generalization of phylogenetic trees which can be used to represent reticulate evolution (where species can come together to form a new species). It has been shown that a certain type of phylogenetic network, called a level-1 network, can essentially be constructed from 4-leaved trees. However, the problem of providing appropriate inference rules for such networks remains unresolved. Here we show that by considering 4-leaved networks, called quarnets, as opposed to 4-leaved trees, it is possible to provide such rules. In particular, we show that these rules can be used to characterize when a collection of quarnets, one for each 4-element subset of $X$, can all be simultaneously displayed by a level-1 network with leaf-set $X$. The rules are an intriguing mixture of tree inference rules, and an inference rule for building up a cyclic ordering of $X$ from orderings on subsets of $X$ of size 4. This opens up several new directions of research for inferring phylogenetic networks from smaller ones, which could yield new algorithms for solving the supernetwork problem in phylogenetics., 17 pages

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of evolutionary trees that are used by biologists to represent the evolution of organisms which have undergone reticulate evolution. Essentially, a phylogenetic network is a directed acyclic graph having a unique root in which the leaves are labelled by a given set of species. Recently, some approaches have been developed to construct phylogenetic networks from collections of networks on 2- and 3-leaved networks, which are known as binets and trinets, respectively. Here we study in more depth properties of collections of binets, one of the simplest possible types of networks into which a phylogenetic network can be decomposed. More specifically, we show that if a collection of level-1 binets is compatible with some binary network, then it is also compatible with a binary level-1 network. Our proofs are based on useful structural results concerning lowest stable ancestors in networks. In addition, we show that, although the binets do not determine the topology of the network, they do determine the number of reticulations in the network, which is one of its most important parameters. We also consider algorithmic questions concerning binets. We show that deciding whether an arbitrary set of binets is compatible with some network is at least as hard as the well-known graph isomorphism problem. However, if we restrict to level-1 binets, it is possible to decide in polynomial time whether there exists a binary network that displays all the binets. We also show that to find a network that displays a maximum number of the binets is NP-hard, but that there exists a simple polynomial-time 1/3-approximation algorithm for this problem. It is hoped that these results will eventually assist in the development of new methods for constructing phylogenetic networks from collections of smaller networks.

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that allow for representation of reticulate evolution. Recently, a space of unrooted phylogenetic networks was introduced, where such a network is a connected graph in which every vertex has degree 1 or 3 and whose leaf-set is a fixed set $X$ of taxa. This space, denoted $\mathcal{N}(X)$, is defined in terms of two operations on networks -- the nearest neighbor interchange and triangle operations -- which can be used to transform any network with leaf set $X$ into any other network with that leaf set. In particular, it gives rise to a metric $d$ on $\mathcal N(X)$ which is given by the smallest number of operations required to transform one network in $\mathcal N(X)$ into another in $\mathcal N(X)$. The metric generalizes the well-known NNI-metric on phylogenetic trees which has been intensively studied in the literature. In this paper, we derive a bound for the metric $d$ as well as a related metric $d_{N\!N\!I}$ which arises when restricting $d$ to the subset of $\mathcal{N}(X)$ consisting of all networks with $2(|X|-1+i)$ vertices, $i \ge 1$. We also introduce two new metrics on networks -- the SPR and TBR metrics -- which generalize the metrics on phylogenetic trees with the same name and give bounds for these new metrics. We expect our results to eventually have applications to the development and understanding of network search algorithms., Comment: 17 pages, 5 figures. This version has a new figure to illustrate Lemma 3.2, and a new Corollary 5.7 that bounds the distance between networks in different tiers

In evolutionary biology, phylogenetic networks are constructed to represent the evolution of species in which reticulate events are thought to have occurred, such as recombination and hybridization. It is therefore useful to have efficiently computable metrics with which to systematically compare such networks. Through developing an optimal algorithm to enumerate all trinets displayed by a level-1 network (a type of network that is slightly more general than an evolutionary tree), here we propose a cubic-time algorithm to compute the trinet distance between two level-1 networks. Employing simulations, we also present a comparison between the trinet metric and the so-called Robinson-Foulds phylogenetic network metric restricted to level-1 networks. The algorithms described in this paper have been implemented in JAVA and are freely available at https://www.uea.ac.uk/computing/TriLoNet., Comment: 11pages, 5 figures

International audience; Binets and trinets are phylogenetic networks with two and three leaves, respectively. Here we consider the problem of deciding if there exists a binary level-1 phylogenetic network displaying a given set T of binary binets or trinets over a taxon set X , and constructing such a network whenever it exists. We show that this is NP-hard for trinets but polynomial-time solvable for binets. Moreover, we show that the problem is still polynomial-time solvable for inputs consisting of binets and trinets as long as the cycles in the trinets have size three. Finally, we present an O(3 |X | poly(|X |)) time algorithm for general sets of binets and trinets. The latter two algorithms generalise to instances containing level-1 networks with arbitrarily many leaves, and thus provide some of the first supernetwork algorithms for computing networks from a set of rooted phylogenetic networks. B Leo van Iersel

In this article we study the treewidth of the \emph{display graph}, an auxiliary graph structure obtained from the fusion of phylogenetic (i.e., evolutionary) trees at their leaves. Earlier work has shown that the treewidth of the display graph is bounded if the trees are in some formal sense topologically similar. Here we further expand upon this relationship. We analyse a number of reduction rules which are commonly used in the phylogenetics literature to obtain fixed parameter tractable algorithms. In some cases (the \emph{subtree} reduction) the reduction rules behave similarly with respect to treewidth, while others (the \emph{cluster} reduction) behave very differently, and the behaviour of the \emph{chain reduction} is particularly intriguing because of its link with graph separators and forbidden minors. We also show that the gap between treewidth and Tree Bisection and Reconnect (TBR) distance can be infinitely large, and that unlike, for example, planar graphs the treewidth of the display graph can be as much as linear in its number of vertices. On a slightly different note we show that if a display graph is formed from the fusion of a phylogenetic network and a tree, rather than from two trees, the treewidth of the display graph is bounded whenever the tree can be topologically embedded ("displayed") within the network. This opens the door to the formulation of the display problem in Monadic Second Order Logic (MSOL). A number of other auxiliary results are given. We conclude with a discussion and list a number of open problems., Comment: 29 pages, 12 figures

Phylogenetic networks are rooted, labelled directed acyclic graphs which are commonly used to represent reticulate evolution. There is a close relationship between phylogenetic networks and multi-labelled trees (MUL-trees). Indeed, any phylogenetic network $N$ can be 'unfolded' to obtain a MUL-tree $U(N)$ and, conversely, a MUL-tree $T$ can in certain circumstances be 'folded' to obtain a phylogenetic network $F(T)$ that exhibits $T$. In this paper, we study properties of the operations $U$ and $F$ in more detail. In particular, we introduce the class of stable networks, phylogenetic networks $N$ for which $F(U(N))$ is isomorphic to $N$, characterise such networks, and show that that they are related to the well-known class of tree-sibling networks. We also explore how the concept of displaying a tree in a network $N$ can be related to displaying the tree in the MUL-tree $U(N)$. To do this, we develop a phylogenetic analogue of graph fibrations. This allows us to view $U(N)$ as the analogue of the universal cover of a digraph, and to establish a close connection between displaying trees in $U(N)$ and reconciling phylogenetic trees with networks., 17 pages, 5 figures

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that are used to represent reticulate evolution. Unrooted phylogenetic networks form a special class of such networks, which naturally generalize unrooted phylogenetic trees. In this paper we define two operations on unrooted phylogenetic networks, one of which is a generalization of the well-known nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) operation on phylogenetic trees. We show that any unrooted phylogenetic network can be transformed into any other such network using only these operations. This generalizes the well-known fact that any phylogenetic tree can be transformed into any other such tree using only NNI operations. It also allows us to define a generalization of tree space and to define some new metrics on unrooted phylogenetic networks. To prove our main results, we employ some fascinating new connections between phylogenetic networks and cubic graphs that we have recently discovered. Our results should be useful in developing new strategies to search for optimal phylogenetic networks, a topic that has recently generated some interest in the literature, as well as for providing new ways to compare networks., Comment: 27 pages, 13 figures

In phylogenetics, distances are often used to measure the incongruence between a pair of phylogenetic trees that are reconstructed by different methods or using different regions of genome. Motivated by the maximum parsimony principle in tree inference, we recently introduced the maximum parsimony (MP) distance, which enjoys various attractive properties due to its connection with several other well-known tree distances, such as TBR and SPR. Here we show that computing the MP distance between two trees, a NP-hard problem in general, is fixed parameter tractable in terms of the TBR distance between the tree pair. Our approach is based on two reduction rules--the chain reduction and the subtree reduction--that are widely used in computing TBR and SPR distances. More precisely, we show that reducing chains to length 4 (but not shorter) preserves the MP distance. In addition, we describe a generalization of the subtree reduction which allows the pendant subtrees to be rooted in different places, and show that this still preserves the MP distance. On a slightly different note we also show that Monadic Second Order Logic (MSOL), posited over an auxiliary graph structure known as the display graph (obtained by merging the two trees at their leaves), can be used to obtain an alternative proof that computation of MP distance is fixed parameter tractable in terms of TBR-distance. We conclude with an extended discussion in which we focus on similarities and differences between MP distance and TBR distance and present a number of open problems. One particularly intriguing question, emerging from the MSOL formulation, is whether two trees with bounded MP distance induce display graphs of bounded treewidth., Comment: Added material on graph minors, MSOL and treewidth

In evolutionary biology, biologists often face the problem of constructing a phylogenetic tree on a set $X$ of species from a multiset $\Pi$ of partitions corresponding to various attributes of these species. One approach that is used to solve this problem is to try instead to associate a tree (or even a network) to the multiset $\Sigma_{\Pi}$ consisting of all those bipartitions $\{A,X-A\}$ with $A$ a part of some partition in $\Pi$. The rational behind this approach is that a phylogenetic tree with leaf set $X$ can be uniquely represented by the set of bipartitions of $X$ induced by its edges. Motivated by these considerations, given a multiset $\Sigma$ of bipartitions corresponding to a phylogenetic tree on $X$, in this paper we introduce and study the set $P(\Sigma)$ consisting of those multisets of partitions $\Pi$ of $X$ with $\Sigma_{\Pi}=\Sigma$. More specifically, we characterize when $P(\Sigma)$ is non-empty, and also identify some partitions in $P(\Sigma)$ that are of maximum and minimum size. We also show that it is NP-complete to decide when $P(\Sigma)$ is non-empty in case $\Sigma$ is an arbitrary multiset of bipartitions of $X$. Ultimately, we hope that by gaining a better understanding of the mapping that takes an arbitrary partition system $\Pi$ to the multiset $\Sigma_{\Pi}$, we will obtain new insights into the use of median networks and, more generally, split-networks to visualize sets of partitions., Comment: 28 pages, submitted to SIAM J. Discrete Mathematics

The Yule-Harding-Kingman (YHK) model and the proportional to distinguishable arrangements (PDA) model are two binary tree generating models that are widely used in evolutionary biology. Understanding the distributions of clade sizes under these two models provides valuable insights into macro-evolutionary processes, and is important in hypothesis testing and Bayesian analyses in phylogenetics. Here we show that these distributions are log-convex, which implies that very large clades or very small clades are more likely to occur under these two models. Moreover, we prove that there exists a critical value $\kappa(n)$ for each $n\geqslant 4$ such that for a given clade with size $k$, the probability that this clade is contained in a random tree with $n$ leaves generated under the YHK model is higher than that under the PDA model if $1, Comment: 21pages