Search

A class of graphs is structurally nowhere dense if it can be constructed from a nowhere dense class by a first-order transduction. Structurally nowhere dense classes vastly generalize nowhere dense classes and constitute important examples of monadically stable classes. We show that the first-order model checking problem is fixed-parameter tractable on every structurally nowhere dense class of graphs. Our result builds on a recently developed game-theoretic characterization of monadically stable graph classes. As a second key ingredient of independent interest, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for approximating weak neighborhood covers (on general graphs). We combine the two tools into a recursive locality-based model checking algorithm. This algorithm is efficient on every monadically stable graph class admitting flip-closed sparse weak neighborhood covers, where flip-closure is a mild additional assumption. Thereby, establishing efficient first-order model checking on monadically stable classes is reduced to proving the existence of flip-closed sparse weak neighborhood covers on these classes - a purely combinatorial problem. We complete the picture by proving the existence of the desired covers for structurally nowhere dense classes: we show that every structurally nowhere dense class can be sparsified by contracting local sets of vertices, enabling us to lift the existence of covers from sparse classes.

Büchi's theorem states that $ω$-regular languages are characterized as languages of the form $\bigcup_i U_i V_i^ω$, where $U_i$ and $V_i$ are regular languages. Parikh automata are automata on finite words whose transitions are equipped with vectors of positive integers, whose sum can be tested for membership in a given semi-linear set. We give an intuitive automata theoretic characterization of languages of the form $U_i V_i^ω$, where $U_i$ and $V_i$ are Parikh-recognizable. Furthermore, we show that the class of such languages, where $U_i$ is Parikh-recognizable and $V_i$ is regular is exactly captured by a model proposed by Klaedtke and Ruess [Automata, Languages and Programming, 2003], which again is equivalent to (a small modification of) reachability Parikh automata introduced by Guha et al. [FSTTCS, 2022]. We finish this study by introducing a model that captures exactly such languages for regular $U_i$ and Parikh-recognizable $V_i$.

A class of graphs C is monadically stable if for every unary expansion Ĉ of C, one cannot encode - using first-order transductions - arbitrarily long linear orders in graphs from C. It is known that nowhere dense graph classes are monadically stable; these include classes of bounded maximum degree and classes that exclude a fixed topological minor. On the other hand, monadic stability is a property expressed in purely model-theoretic terms that is also suited for capturing structure in dense graphs. In this work we provide a characterization of monadic stability in terms of the Flipper game: a game on a graph played by Flipper, who in each round can complement the edge relation between any pair of vertex subsets, and Localizer, who in each round is forced to restrict the game to a ball of bounded radius. This is an analog of the Splitter game, which characterizes nowhere dense classes of graphs (Grohe, Kreutzer, and Siebertz, J. ACM '17). We give two different proofs of our main result. The first proof is based on tools borrowed from model theory, and it exposes an additional property of monadically stable graph classes that is close in spirit to definability of types. Also, as a byproduct, we show that monadic stability for graph classes coincides with monadic stability of existential formulas with two free variables, and we provide another combinatorial characterization of monadic stability via forbidden patterns. The second proof relies on the recently introduced notion of flip-flatness (Dreier, Mählmann, Siebertz, and Toruńczyk, arXiv 2206.13765) and provides an efficient algorithm to compute Flipper’s moves in a winning strategy., LIPIcs, Vol. 261, 50th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2023), pages 128:1-128:16

Disjoint-paths logic, denoted $\mathsf{FO}$+$\mathsf{DP}$, extends first-order logic ($\mathsf{FO}$) with atomic predicates $\mathsf{dp}_k[(x_1,y_1),\ldots,(x_k,y_k)]$, expressing the existence of internally vertex-disjoint paths between $x_i$ and $y_i$, for $1\leq i\leq k$. We prove that for every graph class excluding some fixed graph as a topological minor, the model checking problem for $\mathsf{FO}$+$\mathsf{DP}$ is fixed-parameter tractable. This essentially settles the question of tractable model checking for this logic on subgraph-closed classes, since the problem is hard on subgraph-closed classes not excluding a topological minor (assuming a further mild condition of efficiency of encoding).

The dynamics of real-world applications and systems require efficient methods for improving infeasible solutions or restoring corrupted ones by making modifications to the current state of a system in a restricted way. We propose a new framework of solution discovery via reconfiguration for constructing a feasible solution for a given problem by executing a sequence of small modifications starting from a given state. Our framework integrates and formalizes different aspects of classical local search, reoptimization, and combinatorial reconfiguration. We exemplify our framework on a multitude of fundamental combinatorial problems, namely Vertex Cover, Independent Set, Dominating Set, and Coloring. We study the classical as well as the parameterized complexity of the solution discovery variants of those problems and explore the boundary between tractable and intractable instances.

Several variants of Parikh automata on infinite words were recently introduced by Guha et al. [FSTTCS, 2022]. We show that one of these variants coincides with blind counter machine as introduced by Fernau and Stiebe [Fundamenta Informaticae, 2008]. Fernau and Stiebe showed that every $\omega$-language recognized by a blind counter machine is of the form $\bigcup_iU_iV_i^\omega$ for Parikh recognizable languages $U_i, V_i$, but blind counter machines fall short of characterizing this class of $\omega$-languages. They posed as an open problem to find a suitable automata-based characterization. We introduce several additional variants of Parikh automata on infinite words that yield automata characterizations of classes of $\omega$-language of the form $\bigcup_iU_iV_i^\omega$ for all combinations of languages $U_i, V_i$ being regular or Parikh-recognizable. When both $U_i$ and $V_i$ are regular, this coincides with B\"uchi's classical theorem. We study the effect of $\varepsilon$-transitions in all variants of Parikh automata and show that almost all of them admit $\varepsilon$-elimination. Finally we study the classical decision problems with applications to model checking., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2302.04087, arXiv:2301.08969

Parikh automata on finite words were first introduced by Klaedtke and Rue{\ss} [Automata, Languages and Programming, 2003]. In this paper, we introduce several variants of Parikh automata on infinite words and study their expressiveness. We show that one of our new models is equivalent to synchronous blind counter machines introduced by Fernau and Stiebe [Fundamenta Informaticae, 2008]. All our models admit {\epsilon}-elimination, which to the best of our knowledge is an open question for blind counter automata. We then study the classical decision problems of the new automata models.

Let $\mathscr C$ be a hereditary class of graphs. Assume that for every $p$ there is a hereditary NIP class $\mathscr D_p$ with the property that the vertex set of every graph $G\in\mathscr C$ can be partitioned into $N_p=N_p(G)$ parts in such a way that the union of any $p$ parts induce a subgraph in $\mathscr D_p$ and $\log N_p(G)\in o(\log |G|)$. We prove that $\mathscr C$ is (monadically) NIP. Similarly, if every $\mathscr D_p$ is stable, then $\mathscr C$ is (monadically) stable. Results of this type lead to the definition of decomposition horizons as closure operators. We establish some of their basic properties and provide several further examples of decomposition horizons.

An indiscernible sequence $(\bar a_i)_{1\leq i\leq n}$ in a structure is an ordered sequence of tuples of elements which is very homogeneous in the sense that any two finite subsequences of the same length satisfy the same first-order formulas. We provide new characterizations of monadically stable and monadically NIP classes of structures in terms of indiscernible sequences by showing that they impose a strong structure on their neighborhoods. In particular, we show that every formula~$\phi(x,\bar y)$, where $x$ is a single free variable, has alternation rank at most $2$ over every sufficiently long indiscernible sequence in a monadically NIP class. We provide a second new characterization of monadically stable classes of graphs in terms of a new notion called flip-wideness. Flip-wideness generalizes the notion of uniform quasi-wideness, which characterizes nowhere dense classes and had a key impact on the combinatorial and algorithmic treatment of nowhere dense classes. All our proofs are constructive and yield efficient algorithms.

In the Token Sliding problem we are given a graph $G$ and two independent sets $I_s$ and $I_t$ in $G$ of size $k \geq 1$. The goal is to decide whether there exists a sequence $\langle I_1, I_2, \ldots, I_\ell \rangle$ of independent sets such that for all $i \in \{1,\ldots, \ell\}$ the set $I_i$ is an independent set of size $k$, $I_1 = I_s$, $I_\ell = I_t$ and $I_i \triangle I_{i + 1} = \{u, v\} \in E(G)$. Intuitively, we view each independent set as a collection of tokens placed on the vertices of the graph. Then, the problem asks whether there exists a sequence of independent sets that transforms $I_s$ into $I_t$ where at each step we are allowed to slide one token from a vertex to a neighboring vertex. In this paper, we focus on the parameterized complexity of Token Sliding parameterized by $k$. As shown by Bartier et al., the problem is W[1]-hard on graphs of girth four or less, and the authors posed the question of whether there exists a constant $p \geq 5$ such that the problem becomes fixed-parameter tractable on graphs of girth at least $p$. We answer their question positively and prove that the problem is indeed fixed-parameter tractable on graphs of girth five or more, which establishes a full classification of the tractability of Token Sliding parameterized by the number of tokens based on the girth of the input graph.

A graph vertex-subset problem defines which subsets of the vertices of an input graph are feasible solutions. We view a feasible solution as a set of tokens placed on the vertices of the graph. A reconfiguration variant of a vertex-subset problem asks, given two feasible solutions of size $k$, whether it is possible to transform one into the other by a sequence of token slides (along edges of the graph) or token jumps (between arbitrary vertices of the graph) such that each intermediate set remains a feasible solution of size $k$. Many algorithmic questions present themselves in the form of reconfiguration problems: Given the description of an initial system state and the description of a target state, is it possible to transform the system from its initial state into the target one while preserving certain properties of the system in the process? Such questions have received a substantial amount of attention under the so-called combinatorial reconfiguration framework. We consider reconfiguration variants of three fundamental underlying graph vertex-subset problems, namely Independent Set, Dominating Set, and Connected Dominating Set. We survey both older and more recent work on the parameterized complexity of all three problems when parameterized by the number of tokens $k$. The emphasis will be on positive results and the most common techniques for the design of fixed-parameter tractable algorithms.

Logical transductions provide a very useful tool to encode classes of structures inside other classes of structures, and several important class properties can be defined in terms of transductions. In this paper we study first-order (FO) transductions and the quasiorder they induce on infinite classes of finite graphs. Surprisingly, this quasiorder is very complex, though shaped by the locality properties of first-order logic. This contrasts with the conjectured simplicity of the monadic second order (MSO) transduction quasiorder. We first establish a local normal form for FO transductions, which is of independent interest. This normal form allows to prove, among other results, that the local variants of (monadic) stability and (monadic) dependence are equivalent to their non-local versions. Then we prove that the quotient partial order is a bounded distributive join-semilattice, and that the subposet of additive classes is also a bounded distributive join-semilattice. We characterize transductions of paths, cubic graphs, and cubic trees in terms of bandwidth, bounded degree, and treewidth. We establish that the classes of all graphs with pathwidth at most $k$, for $k\geq 1$ form a strict hierarchy in the FO transduction quasiorder and leave open whether the same holds for the classes of all graphs with treewidth at most $k$. We identify the obstructions for a class to be a transduction of a class with bounded degree, leading to an interesting transduction duality formulation. Eventually, we discuss a notion of dense analogs of sparse transduction-preserved class properties, and propose several related conjectures.

Logical transductions provide a very useful tool to encode classes of structures inside other classes of structures. In this paper we study first-order (FO) transductions and the quasiorder they induce on infinite classes of finite graphs. Surprisingly, this quasiorder is very complex, though shaped by the locality properties of first-order logic. This contrasts with the conjectured simplicity of the monadic second order (MSO) transduction quasiorder. We first establish a local normal form for FO transductions, which is of independent interest. Then we prove that the quotient partial order is a bounded distributive join-semilattice, and that the subposet of additive classes is also a bounded distributive join-semilattice. The FO transduction quasiorder has a great expressive power, and many well studied class properties can be defined using it. We apply these structural properties to prove, among other results, that FO transductions of the class of paths are exactly perturbations of classes with bounded bandwidth, that the local variants of monadic stability and monadic dependence are equivalent to their (standard) non-local versions, and that the classes with pathwidth at most k, for k ��� 1 form a strict hierarchy in the FO transduction quasiorder., LIPIcs, Vol. 216, 30th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2022), pages 31:1-31:16

Nowhere dense classes of graphs are classes of sparse graphs with rich structural and algorithmic properties, however, they fail to capture even simple classes of dense graphs. Monadically stable classes, originating from model theory, generalize nowhere dense classes and close them under transductions, i.e. transformations defined by colorings and simple first-order interpretations. In this work we aim to extend some combinatorial and algorithmic properties of nowhere dense classes to monadically stable classes of finite graphs. We prove the following results. - For every monadically stable class C and fixed integer s ≥ 3, the Ramsey numbers R_C(s,t) are bounded from above by 𝒪(t^{s-1-δ}) for some δ > 0, improving the bound R(s,t) ∈ 𝒪(t^{s-1}/(log t)^{s-1}) known for the class of all graphs and the bounds known for k-stable graphs when s ≤ k. - For every monadically stable class C and every integer r, there exists δ > 0 such that every graph G ∈ C that contains an r-subdivision of the biclique K_{t,t} as a subgraph also contains K_{t^δ,t^δ} as a subgraph. This generalizes earlier results for nowhere dense graph classes. - We obtain a stronger regularity lemma for monadically stable classes of graphs. - Finally, we show that we can compute polynomial kernels for the independent set and dominating set problems in powers of nowhere dense classes. Formerly, only fixed-parameter tractable algorithms were known for these problems on powers of nowhere dense classes., LIPIcs, Vol. 248, 33rd International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2022), pages 11:1-11:17

We show how to compute a 20-approximation of a minimum dominating set in a planar graph in a constant number of rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. This improves on the previously best known approximation factor of 52, which was achieved by an elegant and simple algorithm of Lenzen et al. Our algorithm combines ideas from the algorithm of Lenzen et al. with recent work of Czygrinow et al. and Kublenz et al. to reduce to the case of bounded degree graphs, where we can simulate a distributed version of the classical greedy algorithm., 17 pages

We introduce a new data structure for answering connectivity queries in undirected graphs subject to batched vertex failures. Precisely, given any graph G and integer parameter k, we can in fixed-parameter time construct a data structure that can later be used to answer queries of the form: "are vertices s and t connected via a path that avoids vertices u₁,…, u_k?" in time 2^𝒪(k). In the terminology of the literature on data structures, this gives the first deterministic data structure for connectivity under vertex failures where for every fixed number of failures, all operations can be performed in constant time. With the aim to understand the power and the limitations of our new techniques, we prove an algorithmic meta theorem for the recently introduced separator logic, which extends first-order logic with atoms for connectivity under vertex failures. We prove that the model-checking problem for separator logic is fixed-parameter tractable on every class of graphs that exclude a fixed topological minor. We also show a weak converse. This implies that from the point of view of parameterized complexity, under standard complexity theoretical assumptions, the frontier of tractability of separator logic is almost exactly delimited by classes excluding a fixed topological minor. The backbone of our proof relies on a decomposition theorem of Cygan, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk, and Saurabh [SICOMP '19], which provides a tree decomposition of a given graph into bags that are unbreakable. Crucially, unbreakability allows to reduce separator logic to plain first-order logic within each bag individually. Guided by this observation, we design our model-checking algorithm using dynamic programming over the tree decomposition, where the transition at each bag amounts to running a suitable model-checking subprocedure for plain first-order logic. This approach is robust enough to provide also an extension to efficient enumeration of answers to a query expressed in separator logic., LIPIcs, Vol. 229, 49th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2022), pages 102:1-102:18

The greedy algorithm for approximating dominating sets is a simple method that is known to compute a factor ( ln ⁡ n + 1 ) approximation of a minimum dominating set on any graph with n vertices. We show that a small modification of the greedy algorithm can be used to compute a factor O ( t ⋅ ln ⁡ k ) approximation, where k is the size of a minimum dominating set, on graphs that exclude the complete bipartite graph K t , t as a subgraph.

First-order logic (FO) can express many algorithmic problems on graphs, such as the independent set and dominating set problem parameterized by solution size. On the other hand, FO cannot express the very simple algorithmic question whether two vertices are connected. We enrich FO with connectivity predicates that are tailored to express algorithmic graph properties that are commonly studied in parameterized algorithmics. By adding the atomic predicates conn_k(x,y,z_1,���,z_k) that hold true in a graph if there exists a path between (the valuations of) x and y after (the valuations of) z_1,���,z_k have been deleted, we obtain separator logic FO+conn. We show that separator logic can express many interesting problems such as the feedback vertex set problem and elimination distance problems to first-order definable classes. Denote by FO+conn_k the fragment of separator logic that is restricted to connectivity predicates with at most k+2 variables (that is, at most k deletions). We show that FO+conn_{k+1} is strictly more expressive than FO+conn_k for all k ��� 0. We then study the limitations of separator logic and prove that it cannot express planarity, and, in particular, not the disjoint paths problem. We obtain the stronger disjoint-paths logic FO+DP by adding the atomic predicates disjoint-paths_k[(x_1,y_1),���,(x_k,y_k)] that evaluate to true if there are internally vertex-disjoint paths between (the valuations of) x_i and y_i for all 1 ��� i ��� k. Disjoint-paths logic can express the disjoint paths problem, the problem of (topological) minor containment, the problem of hitting (topological) minors, and many more. Again we show that the fragments FO+DP_k that use predicates for at most k disjoint paths form a strict hierarchy of expressiveness. Finally, we compare the expressive power of the new logics with that of transitive-closure logics and monadic second-order logic., LIPIcs, Vol. 216, 30th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2022), pages 34:1-34:17

Inspired by a width invariant on permutations defined by Guillemot and Marx, Bonnet, Kim, Thomass\'e, and Watrigant introduced the twin-width of graphs, which is a parameter describing its structural complexity. This invariant has been further extended to binary structures, in several (basically equivalent) ways. We prove that a class of binary relational structures (that is: edge-colored partially directed graphs) has bounded twin-width if and only if it is a first-order transduction of a~proper permutation class. As a by-product, we show that every class with bounded twin-width contains at most $2^{O(n)}$ pairwise non-isomorphic $n$-vertex graphs.

We study the connections between the notions of combinatorial discrepancy and graph degeneracy. In particular, we prove that the maximum discrepancy over all subgraphs $H$ of a graph $G$ of the neighborhood set system of $H$ is sandwiched between $\Omega(\log\mathrm{deg}(G))$ and $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{deg}(G))$, where $\mathrm{deg}(G)$ denotes the degeneracy of $G$. We extend this result to inequalities relating weak coloring numbers and discrepancy of graph powers and deduce a new characterization of bounded expansion classes. Then, we switch to a model theoretical point of view, introduce pointer structures, and study their relations to graph classes with bounded expansion. We deduce that a monotone class of graphs has bounded expansion if and only if all the set systems definable in this class have bounded hereditary discrepancy. Using known bounds on the VC-density of set systems definable in nowhere dense classes we also give a characterization of nowhere dense classes in terms of discrepancy. As consequences of our results, we obtain a corollary on the discrepancy of neighborhood set systems of edge colored graphs, a polynomial-time algorithm to compute $\varepsilon$-approximations of size $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon)$ for set systems definable in bounded expansion classes, an application to clique coloring, and even the non-existence of a quantifier elimination scheme for nowhere dense classes., Comment: Submitted version

A strong backdoor in a formula φ of propositional logic to a tractable class C of formulas is a set B of variables of φ such that every assignment of the variables in B results in a formula from C. Strong backdoors of small size or with a good structure, e.g. with small backdoor treewidth, lead to efficient solutions for the propositional satisfiability problem SAT. In this paper we propose the new notion of recursive backdoors, which is inspired by the observation that in order to solve SAT we can independently recurse into the components that are created by partial assignments of variables. The quality of a recursive backdoor is measured by its recursive backdoor depth. Similar to the concept of backdoor treewidth, recursive backdoors of bounded depth include backdoors of unbounded size that have a certain treelike structure. However, the two concepts are incomparable and our results yield new tractability results for SAT., LIPIcs, Vol. 202, 46th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2021), pages 73:1-73:18

We show that the dominating set problem admits a constant factor approximation in a constant number of rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing on graph classes with bounded expansion. This generalizes a result of Czygrinow et al. for graphs with excluded topological minors., Paper accepted at SIROCCO 2021, implemented reviews, corrected an error in Lemma 1

We study two notions of being well-structured for classes of graphs that are inspired by classic model theory. A class of graphs $C$ is monadically stable if it is impossible to define arbitrarily long linear orders in vertex-colored graphs from $C$ using a fixed first-order formula. Similarly, monadic dependence corresponds to the impossibility of defining all graphs in this way. Examples of monadically stable graph classes are nowhere dense classes, which provide a robust theory of sparsity. Examples of monadically dependent classes are classes of bounded rankwidth (or equivalently, bounded cliquewidth), which can be seen as a dense analog of classes of bounded treewidth. Thus, monadic stability and monadic dependence extend classical structural notions for graphs by viewing them in a wider, model-theoretical context. We explore this emerging theory by proving the following: - A class of graphs $C$ is a first-order transduction of a class with bounded treewidth if and only if $C$ has bounded rankwidth and a stable edge relation (i.e. graphs from $C$ exclude some half-graph as a semi-induced subgraph). - If a class of graphs $C$ is monadically dependent and not monadically stable, then $C$ has in fact an unstable edge relation. As a consequence, we show that classes with bounded rankwidth excluding some half-graph as a semi-induced subgraph are linearly $\chi$-bounded. Our proofs are effective and lead to polynomial time algorithms.

We study the graph parameter elimination distance to bounded degree, which was introduced by Bulian and Dawar in their study of the parameterized complexity of the graph isomorphism problem. We prove that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable on planar graphs, that is, there exists an algorithm that given a planar graph $G$ and integers $d$ and $k$ decides in time $f(k,d)\cdot n^c$ for a computable function~$f$ and constant $c$ whether the elimination distance of $G$ to the class of degree $d$ graphs is at most $k$.

The notion of nowhere dense graph classes was introduced by Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and Ossona de Mendez and provides a robust concept of uniform sparseness of graph classes. Nowhere dense classes generalize many familiar classes of sparse graphs such as classes that exclude a fixed graph as a minor or topological minor. They admit several seemingly unrelated natural characterizations that lead to strong algorithmic applications. In particular, the model-checking problem for first-order logic is fixed-parameter tractable over these classes. These notes, prepared for a tutorial at Highlights of Logic, Games and Automata 2019, are a brief introduction to the theory of nowhere denseness, driven by algorithmic applications.

Parameterized complexity theory offers a framework for a refined analysis of hard algorithmic problems. Instead of expressing the running time of an algorithm as a function of the input size only, running times are expressed with respect to one or more parameters of the input instances. In this work we follow the approach of parameterized complexity to provide a framework of parameterized distributed complexity. The central notion of efficiency in parameterized complexity is fixed-parameter tractability and we define the distributed analogue Distributed-FPT (for Distributed in $\{Local, Congest, Congested-Clique\}$) as the class of problems that can be solved in $f(k)$ communication rounds in the Distributed model of distributed computing, where $k$ is the parameter of the problem instance and $f$ is an arbitrary computable function. To classify hardness we introduce three hierarchies. The Distributed-WEFT-hierarchy is defined analogously to the W-hierarchy in parameterized complexity theory via reductions to the weighted circuit satisfiability problem, but it turns out that this definition does not lead to satisfying frameworks for the Local and Congest models. We then follow a logical approach that leads to a more robust theory. We define the levels of the Distributed-W-hierarchy and the Distributed-A-hierarchy that have first-order model-checking problems as their complete problems via suitable reductions.

We consider a generic algorithmic paradigm that we call progressive exploration, which can be used to develop simple and efficient parameterized graph algorithms. We identify two model-theoretic properties that lead to efficient progressive algorithms, namely variants of the Helly property and stability. We demonstrate our approach by giving linear-time fixed-parameter algorithms for the distance-r dominating set problem (parameterized by the solution size) in a wide variety of restricted graph classes, such as powers of nowhere dense classes, map graphs, and (for $r=1$) biclique-free graphs. Similarly, for the distance-r independent set problem the technique can be used to give a linear-time fixed-parameter algorithm on any nowhere dense class. Despite the simplicity of the method, in several cases our results extend known boundaries of tractability for the considered problems and improve the best known running times.

We study the model-checking problem for first- and monadic second-order logic on finite relational structures. The problem of verifying whether a formula of these logics is true on a given structure is considered intractable in general, but it does become tractable on interesting classes of structures, such as on classes whose Gaifman graphs have bounded treewidth. In this paper we continue this line of research and study model-checking for first- and monadic second-order logic in the presence of an ordering on the input structure. We do so in two settings: the general ordered case, where the input structures are equipped with a fixed order or successor relation, and the order invariant case, where the formulas may resort to an ordering, but their truth must be independent of the particular choice of order. In the first setting we show very strong intractability results for most interesting classes of structures. In contrast, in the order invariant case we obtain tractability results for order-invariant monadic second-order formulas on the same classes of graphs as in the unordered case. For first-order logic, we obtain tractability of successor-invariant formulas on classes whose Gaifman graphs have bounded expansion. Furthermore, we show that model-checking for order-invariant first-order formulas is tractable on coloured posets of bounded width., Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1701.08516

The notion of bounded expansion captures uniform sparsity of graph classes and renders various algorithmic problems that are hard in general tractable. In particular, the model-checking problem for first-order logic is fixed-parameter tractable over such graph classes. With the aim of generalizing such results to dense graphs, we introduce classes of graphs with structurally bounded expansion , defined as first-order transductions of classes of bounded expansion. As a first step towards their algorithmic treatment, we provide their characterization analogous to the characterization of classes of bounded expansion via low treedepth covers (or colorings), replacing treedepth by its dense analogue called shrubdepth.

For $\alpha\colon\mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$, an $\alpha$-approximate bi-kernel is a polynomial-time algorithm that takes as input an instance $(I, k)$ of a problem $Q$ and outputs an instance $(I',k')$ of a problem $Q'$ of size bounded by a function of $k$ such that, for every $c\geq 1$, a $c$-approximate solution for the new instance can be turned into a $c\cdot\alpha(k)$-approximate solution of the original instance in polynomial time. This framework of \emph{lossy kernelization} was recently introduced by Lokshtanov et al. We prove that for every nowhere dense class of graphs, every $\alpha>1$ and $r\in\mathbb{N}$ there exists a polynomial $p$ (whose degree depends only on $r$ while its coefficients depend on $\alpha$) such that the connected distance-$r$ dominating set problem with parameter $k$ admits an $\alpha$-approximate bi-kernel of size $p(k)$. Furthermore, we show that this result cannot be extended to more general classes of graphs which are closed under taking subgraphs by showing that if a class $C$ is somewhere dense and closed under taking subgraphs, then for some value of $r\in\mathbb{N}$ there cannot exist an $\alpha$-approximate bi-kernel for the (connected) distance-$r$ dominating set problem on $C$ for any function $\alpha\colon\mathbb{N}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ (assuming the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis)., Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1706.09339

The notions of bounded expansion and nowhere denseness have been applied very successfully in algorithmic graph theory. We study the corresponding notions of directed bounded expansion and nowhere crownfulness on directed graphs. We show that many of the algorithmic tools that were developed for undirected bounded expansion classes can, with some care, also be applied in their directed counterparts, and thereby we highlight a rich algorithmic structure theory of directed bounded expansion classes. More specifically, we show that the directed Steiner tree problem is fixed-parameter tractable on any class of directed bounded expansion parameterized by the number $k$ of non-terminals plus the maximal diameter $s$ of a strongly connected component in the subgraph induced by the terminals. Our result strongly generalizes a result of Jones et al., who proved that the problem is fixed parameter tractable on digraphs of bounded degeneracy if the set of terminals is required to be acyclic. We furthermore prove that for every integer $r\geq 1$, the distance-$r$ dominating set problem can be approximated up to a factor $O(\log k)$ and the connected distance-$r$ dominating set problem can be approximated up to a factor $O(k\cdot \log k)$ on any class of directed bounded expansion, where $k$ denotes the size of an optimal solution. If furthermore, the class is nowhere crownful, we are able to compute a polynomial kernel for distance-$r$ dominating sets. Polynomial kernels for this problem were not known to exist on any other existing digraph measure for sparse classes.

We prove that for every positive integer $r$ and for every graph class $\mathcal G$ of bounded expansion, the $r$-Dominating Set problem admits a linear kernel on graphs from $\mathcal G$. Moreover, when $\mathcal G$ is only assumed to be nowhere dense, then we give an almost linear kernel on $\mathcal G$ for the classic Dominating Set problem, i.e., for the case $r=1$. These results generalize a line of previous research on finding linear kernels for Dominating Set and $r$-Dominating Set. However, the approach taken in this work, which is based on the theory of sparse graphs, is radically different and conceptually much simpler than the previous approaches. We complement our findings by showing that for the closely related Connected Dominating Set problem, the existence of such kernelization algorithms is unlikely, even though the problem is known to admit a linear kernel on $H$-topological-minor-free graphs. Also, we prove that for any somewhere dense class $\mathcal G$, there is some $r$ for which $r$-Dominating Set is W[$2$]-hard on $\mathcal G$. Thus, our results fall short of proving a sharp dichotomy for the parameterized complexity of $r$-Dominating Set on subgraph-monotone graph classes: we conjecture that the border of tractability lies exactly between nowhere dense and somewhere dense graph classes., Comment: v2: new author, added results for r-Dominating Sets in bounded expansion graphs

The generalised colouring numbers $\mathrm{adm}_r(G)$, $\mathrm{col}_r(G)$, and $\mathrm{wcol}_r(G)$ were introduced by Kierstead and Yang as generalisations of the usual colouring number, also known as the degeneracy of a graph, and have since then found important applications in the theory of bounded expansion and nowhere dense classes of graphs, introduced by Ne\v{s}et\v{r}il and Ossona de Mendez. In this paper, we study the relation of the colouring numbers with two other measures that characterise nowhere dense classes of graphs, namely with uniform quasi-wideness, studied first by Dawar et al. in the context of preservation theorems for first-order logic, and with the splitter game, introduced by Grohe et al. We show that every graph excluding a fixed topological minor admits a universal order, that is, one order witnessing that the colouring numbers are small for every value of $r$. Finally, we use our construction of such orders to give a new proof of a result of Eickmeyer and Kawarabayashi, showing that the model-checking problem for successor-invariant first-order formulas is fixed-parameter tractable on classes of graphs with excluded topological minors.

The Minimum Dominating Set (MDS) problem is not only one of the most fundamental problems in distributed computing, it is also one of the most challenging ones. While it is well-known that minimum dominating sets cannot be approximated locally on general graphs, over the last years, several breakthroughs have been made on computing local approximations on sparse graphs. This paper presents a deterministic and local constant factor approximation for minimum dominating sets on bounded genus graphs, a very large family of sparse graphs. Our main technical contribution is a new analysis of a slightly modified, first-order definable variant of an existing algorithm by Lenzen et al. Interestingly, unlike existing proofs for planar graphs, our analysis does not rely on any topological arguments. We believe that our techniques can be useful for the study of local problems on sparse graphs beyond the scope of this paper.

The $k$-vertex disjoint paths problem is one of the most studied problems in algorithmic graph theory. In 1994, Schrijver proved that the problem can be solved in polynomial time for every fixed $k$ when restricted to the class of planar digraphs and it was a long standing open question whether it is fixed-parameter tractable (with respect to parameter $k$) on this restricted class. Only recently, \cite{CMPP}.\ achieved a major breakthrough and answered the question positively. Despite the importance of this result (and the brilliance of their proof), it is of rather theoretical importance. Their proof technique is both technically extremely involved and also has at least double exponential parameter dependence. Thus, it seems unrealistic that the algorithm could actually be implemented. In this paper, therefore, we study a smaller class of planar digraphs, the class of upward planar digraphs, a well studied class of planar graphs which can be drawn in a plane such that all edges are drawn upwards. We show that on the class of upward planar digraphs the problem (i) remains NP-complete and (ii) the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. While membership in FPT follows immediately from \cite{CMPP}'s general result, our algorithm has only single exponential parameter dependency compared to the double exponential parameter dependence for general planar digraphs. Furthermore, our algorithm can easily be implemented, in contrast to the algorithm in \cite{CMPP}., 14 pages