Search

Background: There is an uncommon subset of supracondylar humeral fractures in children that are so unstable they can displace into both flexion and extension. The purposes of this study were to describe this subset of supracondylar fractures and to report a new technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for their treatment., Methods: In a retrospective review of 297 consecutive displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated operatively at our institution, we identified nine that were completely unstable with documented displacement into both flexion and extension as seen on fluoroscopic examination with the patient under anesthesia. We used a new technique for closed reduction and fixation of these fractures, and then we assessed fracture-healing and complications from the injury and treatment., Results: All nine fractures were treated satisfactorily with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The complication rate associated with these unstable fractures was no higher than that associated with the 288 more stable fractures. Seven of the nine fractures were stabilized with lateral entry pin placement, and two fractures were stabilized with crossed medial and lateral pins. None of the patients had a nonunion, cubitus varus, malunion, additional surgery, or loss of motion., Conclusions: In rare supracondylar fractures in children, multidirectional instability results in displacement into flexion and/or extension. This fracture can be classified as type IV according to the Gartland system, as it is less stable than a Gartland type-III extension supracondylar fracture. These fractures can be treated successfully with a new technique of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, thus avoiding open reduction.

Background: The commonly accepted treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children is fracture reduction and percutaneous pin fixation; however, there is controversy about the optimal placement of the pins. A crossed-pin configuration is believed to be mechanically more stable than lateral pins alone; however, the ulnar nerve can be injured with the use of a medial pin. It has not been proved that the added stability of a medial pin is clinically necessary since, in young children, pin fixation is always augmented with immobilization in a splint or cast., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of reduction and Kirschner wire fixation of 345 extension-type supracondylar fractures in children. Maintenance of fracture reduction and evidence of ulnar nerve injury were evaluated in relation to pin configuration and fracture pattern. Of 141 children who had a Gartland type-2 fracture (a partially intact posterior cortex), seventy-four were treated with lateral pins only and sixty-seven were treated with crossed pins. Of 204 children who had a Gartland type-3 (unstable) fracture, fifty-one were treated with lateral pins only and 153 were treated with crossed pins., Results: There was no difference with regard to maintenance of fracture reduction, as seen on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, between the crossed pins and the lateral pins. The configuration of the pins did not affect the maintenance of reduction of either the Gartland type-2 fractures or the Gartland type-3 fractures. Ulnar nerve injury was not seen in the 125 patients in whom only lateral pins were used. The use of a medial pin was associated with ulnar nerve injury in 4% (six) of 149 patients in whom the pin was applied without hyperflexion of the elbow and in 15% (eleven) of seventy-one in whom the medial pin was applied with the elbow hyperflexed. Two years after the pinning, one of the seventeen children with ulnar nerve injury had persistent motor weakness and a sensory deficit., Conclusions: Fixation with only lateral pins is safe and effective for both Gartland type-2 and Gartland type-3 (unstable) supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The use of only lateral pins prevents iatrogenic injury to the ulnar nerve. On the basis of our findings, we do not recommend the routine use of crossed pins in the treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. If a medial pin is used, the elbow should not be hyperflexed during its insertion.

Sixty-six femur fractures sustained by children ages 4-14 years and treated with external fixation were reviewed retrospectively to assess factors influencing the incidence of refracture. The total rate of secondary fracture was 12% (eight patients) including five recurrent fractures at the original fracture site and three fractures through the pin sites. After removal of the external fixator, five patients refractured at the original fracture site and one patient fractured through a pin tract. Two patients fractured at pin sites while the fixator was still in place. Multivariate linear-regression analysis showed no correlation between the incidence of refracture and fracture pattern, percentage of bone fragment contact after fixator application, type of external fixator, or dynamization. A statistically significant association (p < 0.05) was found between the number of cortices demonstrating bridging callus [on both anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views] at the time of fixator removal and the rate of refracture. Fractures showing fewer than three cortices of bridging callus had a three (33%) in nine rate of refracture, whereas fractures with three or four cortices of bridging callus had a two (4%) of 57 rate of refracture.

Fourteen children with acute fractures, mostly open fractures, were treated with Hoffmann external fixation as a part of their fracture care. Thirteen fractures involved the tibia and one the femur. The average follow-up of these children was 17 months. The Hoffmann device was used for 6 to 20 weeks with an average of 11 weeks. One-half of the children had purulent drainage at some time during their treatment although no chronic infections resulted. Fracture union was present after 12 to 52 weeks with a median of 17 weeks. Three refractures occurred after apparent union. The only final angular deformity was in one patient with 6 degrees of varus. Three patients had leg length discrepancies of 2 cm or more. Four patients had overgrowth of the injured limb of 1.0 to 3.0 cm. Range of motion was not permanently impaired by the Hoffmann device. Use of the Hoffmann device for external skeletal fixation is recommended in children with open fractures with skin loss or burns, in children with head injury with resultant increased motor tone, and in polytrauma patients to facilitate patient care and transport for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.