Search

Purpose: Although there is evidence that a single headless compression screw is sufficient for fixation of most scaphoid fractures, double-screw osteosynthesis has been shown to result in higher failure strength and stiffness than a single screw. However, the biomechanical effect of different screw configurations has not been determined., Methods: A standardized unstable fracture model was produced in 28 cadaveric scaphoids. Specimens were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 fixation groups using 2 internal compression screws positioned in either the sagittal or coronal plane. A specimen-specific 3-dimensionally-printed customized screw placement and osteotomy device was developed using computer-aided design-generated models derived from computed tomography scan data of each individual scaphoid. Load to failure and stiffness of the repair constructs were evaluated using a mechanical testing system., Results: There were no significant differences in size, weight, and density between the scaphoid specimens. The average distance between screws was significantly greater in the sagittal group than in the coronal group. There were no significant differences between the coronal and sagittal aligned double screws in load to 2 mm displacement (mean coronal 180.9 ± 109.7 N; mean sagittal 156.0 ± 85.8 N), load to failure (mean coronal 275.9 ± 150.6 N; mean sagittal 248.0 ± 109.5 N), stiffness (mean coronal 111.7 ± 67.3 N/mm; mean sagittal 101.2 ± 45.1 N/mm), and energy absorption (mean coronal 472.6 ± 261.4 mJ; mean sagittal 443.5 ± 272.7 mJ)., Conclusions: There are no significant biomechanical differences between the sagittal or coronal aligned double headless compression screws in a scaphoid fracture model with bone loss., Clinical Relevance: In cases where double-screw fixation of the scaphoid is being considered, the placement of double screws can be at the discretion of the surgeon, and can be dictated by ease of access, surgical preference, and fracture orientation., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We compared four methods of metacarpal shaft fixation: 2.2 mm intramedullary headless compression screw; 3.0 mm intramedullary headless compression screw; intramedullary K-wire fixation; and dorsal plate fixation. Transverse mid-diaphyseal fractures were created in 64 metacarpal sawbones and were assigned into four groups. Peak load to failure and stiffness were measured in cantilever bending and torsion. We found that dorsal plating had the highest peak load to failure. However, initial bending stiffness of the 3.0 mm intramedullary headless compression screw was higher than that of the dorsal plates. In torsion testing, dorsal plating had the highest peak torque, but there was no significant difference in torsional stiffness between the plate and intramedullary headless compression screw constructs. We concluded that intramedullary headless compression screw fixation is biomechanically superior to K-wires in cantilever bending and torsion; however, it is less stable than dorsal plating. In our study, the initial stability provided by K-wire fixation was sufficient to cope with expected loads in the early rehabilitation period, whereas dorsal plates and IHCS constructs provided stability far in excess of what is required.

Purpose: High bone density and quality is associated with improved screw fixation in fracture fixation. The objective of this study was to assess bone density and quality in the proximal and distal scaphoid to determine optimum sites for placement of 2 screws in scaphoid fracture fixation., Methods: Twenty-nine cadaveric human scaphoid specimens were harvested and scanned using micro-computed tomography. Bone density (bone volume fraction) and bone quality (relative bone surface area, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness) were evaluated in 4 quadrants within each of the proximal and distal scaphoid., Results: The proximal radial quadrant of the scaphoid had significantly greater bone volume than the distal ulnar (mean difference, 33.2%) and distal volar quadrants (mean difference, 32.3%). There was a significantly greater trabecular number in the proximal radial quadrant than in the distal ulnar (mean difference, 16.7%) and in the distal volar quadrants (mean difference, 15.9%) and between the proximal ulnar and the distal ulnar quadrants (mean difference, 12%). There was a significantly greater bone surface area in the proximal radial and distal radial quadrants than in the distal ulnar and distal volar quadrants. There were no significant differences in trabecular thickness between the 8 analyzed quadrants CONCLUSIONS: Although there are differences in bone volume, trabecular number, and bone surface area between the proximal pole of the scaphoid and that of the distal pole, there were no significant differences in the bone quality (trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and relative bone surface area) and density (bone volume fraction) between the 4 quadrants of the proximal or distal pole of the cadaveric scaphoids studied., Clinical Relevance: Insertion of 2 headless compression screws can be determined by ease of surgical access and ease of screw positioning and not by differences in bone quality or density of the proximal or distal scaphoid., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)