Search

The pathophysiology after polytrauma represents a complex network of interactions. While it was thought for a long time that the direct and indirect effects of hypoperfusion are most relevant due to the endothelial permeability changes, it was discovered that the innate immune response to trauma is equally important in modifying the organ response. Recent multi center studies provided a "genetic storm" theory, according to which certain neutrophil changes are activated at the time of injury. However, a second hit phenomenon can be induced by activation of certain molecules by direct organ injury, or pathogens (damage associated molecular patterns, DAMPS - pathogen associated molecular patterns, PAMPS). The interactions between the four pathogenetic cycles (of shock, coagulopathy, temperature loss and soft tissue injuries) and cross-talk between coagulation and inflammation have also been identified as important modifiers of the clinical status. In a similar fashion, overzealous surgeries and their associated soft tissue injury and blood loss can induce secondary worsening of the patient condition. Therefore, staged surgeries in certain indications represent an important alternative, to allow for performing a "safe definitive surgery" strategy for major fractures. The current review summarizes all these situations in a detailed fashion., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: Sustained changes in resuscitation and transfusion management have been observed since the turn of the millennium, along with an ongoing discussion of surgical management strategies. The aims of this study are threefold: a) to evaluate the objective changes in resuscitation and mass transfusion protocols undertaken in major level I trauma centers; b) to summarize the improvements in diagnostic options for early risk profiling in multiply injured patients and c) to assess the improvements in surgical treatment for acute major fractures in the multiply injured patient., Methods: I. A systematic review of the literature (comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases) and a concomitant data base (from a single Level I center) analysis were performed. Two authors independently extracted data using a pre-designed form. A pooled analysis was performed to determine the changes in the management of polytraumatized patients after the change of the millennium. II. A data base from a level I trauma center was utilized to test any effects of treatment changes on outcome., Inclusion Criteria: adult patients, ISS > 16, admission < less than 24 h post trauma. Exclusion: Oncological diseases, genetic disorders that affect the musculoskeletal system. Parameters evaluated were mortality, ICU stay, ICU complications (Sepsis, Pneumonia, Multiple organ failure)., Results: I. From the electronic databases, 5141 articles were deemed to be relevant. 169 articles met the inclusion criteria and a manual review of reference lists of key articles identified an additional 22 articles. II. Out of 3668 patients, 2694 (73.4%) were male, the mean ISS was 28.2 (SD 15.1), mean NISS was 37.2 points (SD 17.4 points) and the average length of stay was 17.0 days (SD 18.7 days) with a mean length of ICU stay of 8.2 days (SD 10.5 days), and a mean ventilation time of 5.1 days (SD 8.1 days). Both surgical management and nonsurgical strategies have changed over time. Damage control resuscitation, dynamic analyses of coagulopathy and lactate clearance proved to sharpen the view of the worsening trauma patient and facilitated the prevention of further complications. The subsequent surgical care has become safer and more balanced, avoiding overzealous initial surgeries, while performing early fixation, when patients are physiologically stable or rapidly improving. Severe chest trauma and soft tissue injuries require further evaluation., Conclusions: Multiple changes in management (resuscitation, transfusion protocols and balanced surgical care) have taken place. Moreover, improvement in mortality rates and complications associated with several factors were also observed. These findings support the view that the management of polytrauma patients has been substantially improved over the past 3 decades., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pelvic fractures contribute to morbidity and mortality following injury. We sought to study the impact of pelvic fractures on the clinical course and outcomes of trauma patients with a pelvic fracture in comparison to patients with similar injury severity without pelvic fracture to identify potential parameters to track patients' clinical course post-injury., Methods: A cohort of 206 consecutive blunt trauma survivors, studied over a 5-year period in a level I trauma center of which 75 patients (36.4%) had a pelvic fracture, was included in the study. To perform a retrospective cohort study with matched controls, 60 patients of the pelvic fracture group [(PF), 41 males and 19 females; age: 40 ± 17; injury severity score (ISS): 26.6 ± 9.3] were compared to 60 patients without pelvic fracture (non-PF) trauma as controls (41 males and 19 females; age: 40 ± 13; ISS: 26.9 ± 7.7), both with matching age (±5 years), sex, and ISS (±5 points)., Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), total LOS, and Marshall MOD score between PF and non-PF groups, respectively. Acid-base markers such as pH, lactate, LDH, and base deficit were all significantly altered in PF compared to non-PF cohort upon admission. Moreover, our analysis showed significant differences in inflammatory biomarkers (Prolactin, CRP, and IL-6), and clinical parameters (CPK, Hgb, Platelets count, and WBC) over the 7-day clinical course in patients with PF when compared to non-PF cohort., Conclusion: In this matched cohort, patients with pelvic fractures exhibited biochemical and physiological alterations upon admission. Furthermore, our results suggest that pelvic fracture affects the clinical outcomes in severely injured patients, independently of injury severity, mechanism of injury, age or gender.

Fracture fixation devices are implanted into a growing number of patients each year. This may be attributed to an increase in the popularity of operative fracture care and the development of ever more sophisticated implants, which may be used in even the most difficult clinical cases. Furthermore, as the general population ages, fragility fractures become more frequent. With the increase in number of surgical interventions, the absolute number of complications of these surgical treatments will inevitably rise. Implant-related infection and compromised fracture healing remain the most challenging and prevalent complications in operative fracture care. Any strategy that can help to reduce these complications will not only lead to a faster and more complete resumption of activities, but will also help to reduce the socio-economic impact. In this review we describe the influence of implant design and material choice on complication rates in trauma patients. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of local delivery systems, such as implant coatings and bone cement, and how these systems may have an impact on the prevalence, prevention and treatment outcome of these complications., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of the Study: A prospective cohort study evaluates the functional and radiological outcome of thoracolumbar spine fractures treated either with open or percutaneous dorsal instrumentation. In recent years, several studies advocate percutaneous stabilization of spinal fractures in patients without neurological deficits. However, it is still debated whether percutaneous stabilization is superior to open dorsal instrumentation in spinal trauma., Material and Methods: This study was performed between 2010 and 2012 at a Level 1 trauma center. Patients treated either with an open or a percutaneous dorsal instrumentation for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine (T11 to L2) were included. Fracture morphology, screw positioning and clinical parameters were analyzed. Standardized questionnaires (VAS-spine-score; Oswestry-disability-score; SF-36) and follow up radiographs were performed., Results: Overall 72 patients (29 percutaneous; 43 open) could be included. The surgical and the early postsurgical course were similar between both groups. Furthermore the operative approach had no influence on the functional and radiological outcome one year after surgery, but the questionnaires showed moderate impairments within both groups. Also both groups showed a significant loss of reduction after the first postoperative month (p < 0.01). Within the open group a significantly higher amount of fracture reduction (p < 0.01) and a significantly reduced intraoperative radiation exposure was seen (open 105.9 sec.; percutaneous 143.1 sec; p < 0.05); whereas the percutaneous approach was associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (open 2.2 g/dl; percutaneous 1.2 g/dl; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The functional and the radiological outcome of both groups was comparable one year after trauma. Minor advantages of the percutaneous system was less blood loss, whereas the open approach was associated with a significantly higher amount of initial reduction and significantly less intraoperative radiation exposure. Independent from the type of posterior fixation loss of reduction was already significant in the early postoperative course.

Background: Fracture healing is a complex biological process with specific temporal expression patterns. During this process new bone tissue is formed, which is similar to the original bone in quality and structure. This occurs in four phases: inflammation, formation of a soft tissue callus, formation of a bony callus and remodelling of the bony callus. This needs the precise orchestration of each cell type involved., Objectives: This article presents details of the fracture healing phases and the relevant factors. During the aging process there is an increase of reactive oxygen species and a change in expression pattern of growth factors that have a negative effect on the fracture healing process., Methods: A selective review of the literature was carried out in PubMed concerning the influence of aging on fracture healing., Conclusion: The healing process is regulated by systemic and local factors. An understanding of these processes and the changes during aging is necessary in order to improve the knowledge of delayed or lack of fracture healing during aging to decide when an intervention is needed.

Background: The aim of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fractures around the knee joint is the exact anatomic reconstruction of joint surfaces in order to achieve an early and load stable bone situation. Primary endoprosthetics as the initial treatment can represent an alternative treatment option for a closely selected number of geriatric patients., Objectives: The chances and risks of primary endoprosthetics in comparison to ORIF as the gold standard for initial treatment of fractures close to the knee joint in the elderly are presented, Material and Methods: A selective search of the literature was carried out in consideration of national recommendations and own experience gained as head of a center for geriatric traumatology., Results: If the soft tissue coverage is not damaged by the injury, primary endoprosthetics can offer advantages compared to ORIF when a load stable joint is indispensable due to poor compliance, pre-existing arthritis and advanced age., Discussion: The risk of postoperative loss of correction is minimized by the prosthesis but the revision possibilities are very limited due to voluminous prostheses with a high degree of coupling. The indications for primary prosthesis implantation for acute treatment of fractures close to the knee should therefore be closely controlled because this should be the first and last intervention for fracture treatment in geriatric patients.

We report the functional and socioeconomic long-term outcome of patients with pelvic ring injuries. We identified 109 patients treated at a Level I trauma centre between 1973 and 1990 with multiple blunt orthopaedic injuries including an injury to the pelvic ring, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥ 16. These patients were invited for clinical review at a minimum of ten years after the initial injury, at which point functional results, general health scores and socioeconomic factors were assessed. In all 33 isolated anterior (group A), 33 isolated posterior (group P) and 43 combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries (group A/P) were included. The mean age of the patients at injury was 28.8 years (5 to 55) and the mean ISS was 22.7 (16 to 44). At review the mean Short-Form 12 physical component score for the A/P group was 38.71 (22.12 to 56.56) and the mean Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome subjective score was 67.27 (12.48 to 147.42), being significantly worse compared with the other two groups (p = 0.004 and p = 0.024, respectively). A total of 42 patients (39%) had a limp and 12 (11%) required crutches. Car or public transport usage was restricted in 16 patients (15%). Overall patients in groups P and A/P had a worse outcome. The long-term outcome of patients with posterior or combined anterior/posterior pelvic ring injuries is poorer than of those with an isolated anterior injury.

Fractures of the acetabulum are a challenge in terms of orientation and the surgical skills of the orthopedic trauma surgeon. Due to the surrounding soft tissues and because of the indirect reduction control, operative treatment of acetabular fractures can be very demanding. This review includes the anatomical and clinical features, the radiological diagnostic approach, the classification systems, and, in particular, the surgical approaches and treatment principles. The work houses for surgical approaches are the ilioinguinal and the posterior (Kocher-Langenbeck) approach. In view of the high complication rate, the extended approaches are of less relevance. The therapeutic relevance of recent developments including navigation is discussed.

Complex fractures are still a major clinical challenge. The treatment options of large bony defects either with autografts or allografts are limited in terms of material availability and tissue in-growth. Tissue engineering might offer a solution to this problem. In an interdisciplinary approach artificial bony tissue can be generated which mimics normal bone in terms of function and morphology. So far tissue engineering of bone is mainly confined to laboratory investigations whereas clinical applications are still in the beginning. This manuscript presents the most important scaffolds as well as growth factors and cell systems. Furthermore, it focuses on clinical studies for the treatment of large bony defects using tissue engineered cell-matrix constructs.

In polytraumatised patients, fracture management depends on the overall injury severity. For decision making, patients are grouped in one of four categories (STABILE, BORDERLINE, INSTABLE and IN EXTREMIS). STABILE patients should and BORDERLINE patients may undergo primary definitive fracture stabilisation; in contrast, this is not recommended for INSTABLE or IN EXTREMIS patients. The marginal soft tissue envelope of the tibia predisposes for open fractures, compartment syndrome, and wound infections. Therefore the management of lower leg injuries is demanding, especially in polytraumatised patients. Bilateral tibia fractures and ipsilateral tibia and femur fractures represent a special entity. For these injuries special algorithms, which consider the soft tissue status of the tibia and the overall injury severity, have been developed. The indication for fasciotomy covers a wide field and may be performed prophylactically. The decision for amputation is based on the patient's general condition and the soft-tissue and neurovascular status. Scoring systems are useful for decision making, however individual decisions should be made.

The incidence of gunshot wounds is increasing also in Europe and surgeons in urban trauma centers are more frequently confronted with this type of injury. Since there is no established treatment algorithm for gunshot injuries to the extremities, the surgeon should rely on established soft tissue injury and fracture protocols. Gunshot fractures with minor soft tissue destruction should be treated as closed fractures. The treatment of choice for unstable fractures is early internal stabilization, whereas stable fractures may be treated by functional bracing. The administration of an antibiotic prophylaxis for fractures with minor soft tissue injury is controversial. Gunshot fractures with major soft tissue injury should be treated as open fractures. Debridement of nonviable tissue and external fixation are recommended. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics are mandatory and prophylactic fasciotomy is often required. Upon definitive internal stabilization, bone grafting should be considered since gunshot fractures are usually associated with a high degree of comminution. Articular gunshot injuries are treated as open joint injuries and require irrigation, debridement, foreign body removal and antibiotic prophylaxis.

This paper summarises the current knowledge on the effects of medullary reaming of long-bone fractures. Following a review of intramedullary vascular physiology, the consequences for vascularity, the autograft effects, the generation of heat, and fat embolism are outlined. Also, alternative reaming techniques are described.

With the development of systems of trauma care the management of pelvic disruption has evolved and has become increasingly refined. The goal is to achieve an anatomical reduction and stable fixation of the fracture. This requires adequate visualisation for reduction of the fracture and the placement of fixation. Despite the advances in surgical approach and technique, the functional outcomes do not always produce the desired result. New methods of percutaneous treatment in conjunction with innovative computer-based imaging have evolved in an attempt to overcome the existing difficulties. This paper presents an overview of the technical aspects of percutaneous surgery of the pelvis and acetabulum.

Previous studies have suggested that the lower-extremities are among the most frequently injured body regions in polytrauma patients and have a major impact on the functional recovery following polytrauma. In particular, injuries to the distal part of the lower-extremity appear to be associated with a poor functional outcome. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of injuries below the knee joint on the long-term functional outcome following polytrauma. Three hundred eighty-nine polytrauma patients with associated lower-extremity fractures and a minimum follow-up of 10 years were included in this study. All patients were examined by a doctor, using a patient questionnaire and a standardised physical examination. Significantly, inferior outcomes were seen in patients with fractures below the knee joint as measured by the modified Karlström-Olerud score, Lysholm score, range of motion, weight bearing status, Hannover score for polytrauma outcome (HASPOC), SF-12, Tegner activity score, and inability to work (P < 0.05). Fractures below the knee joint have a significant impact on the functional recovery following polytrauma. We suggest that delayed treatment, thin soft tissue envelope below the knee joint, high-energy trauma, unfavorable blood supply, and complex fracture patterns contribute to these unfavorable outcomes.

Pelvic ring injuries are often associated with other system injuries and require a multidisciplinary approach for their treatment. Early mortality is usually secondary to uncontrolled haemorrhage whereas late mortality is due to associated injuries and sepsis-induced multiple organ failure. The management of the pelvic fracture should be conceived as part of the resuscitative effort as errors in early management may lead to significant increases in mortality. In severely multiple injured patients who are in an 'unstable' or 'in extremis' clinical condition damage control orthopedics is the current treatment of choice. By performing limited surgical interventions the subsequent reduction in blood loss and transfusion requirements can only be beneficial in these critically ill patients, reducing the risk of developing systemic complications and early mortality.

Open reduction and internal fixation is the treatment of choice for displaced acetabular fractures. The surgical approach depends on the fracture type, concomitant injuries, and general condition of the patient. The ilioinguinal approach provides a good exposure to the medial wall and is associated with an acceptable degree of surgical trauma. Exposure of the joint surface, however, is difficult when using the ilioinguinal approach. We report a case of a polytraumatized 39-year-old patient who sustained a posterior hip displacement and a two-column acetabular fracture. An osteotomy of the iliac ala was performed via an ilioinguinal approach to fragments of the acetabular surface that were displaced distally. Thereby, reposition of a craniolateral fragment was achieved without the need to extend the surgical approach or to perform a second incision.

There have been substantial changes in the management of multiply injured patients over the last decades. In the 1950s and 60s, perioperative care was limited and the surgical techniques were not well developed. It was therefore discussed that a patient might be "too sick to operate" and the general recommendation was to postpone surgical care of the extremities,until a patient had stabilized. In addition this recommendation was maintained by fears of the "fat embolism syndrome", which was considered to be directly related to fat and intramedullary contents released from the fracture site leading many to believe that early manipulation of the fracture was unsafe. The use of simple splintage clearly demonstrated the importance of skeletal stabilisation by reducing the effect of any continuing injury and this positive effect of skeletal stabilistion became more obvious with the implementation of standardized techniques of osteosynthesis. In the 1970's, pioneer studies appeared in the literature reporting that immediate stabilisation of femur fractures drastically reduced problems of traumatic pulmonary failure and post-operative care when compared to traditional non-operative fracture management. Thereafter, immediate and complete definitive operative care of all fractures has been said to represent the optimal treatment for the patient with multiple orthopaedic injuries and the benefits of this approach have been demonstrated in numerous studies within the last two decades.However,exceptions have been discussed in the past few years, where the principle of early total care may not be beneficial (head and chest trauma, high ISS predisposing to posttraumatic complications, borderline patients). In high risk, borderline patients, the surgical burden was demonstrated to increase the risk of postoperative complications. For these patients, the concept of initial temporary fixation and secondary conversion to a definitive procedure has recently been advocated, and the term "damage control orthopaedic surgery" was coined. Within recent years, an increased consensus has occurred across the countries and the oceans in regards to the acceptance of the concept of damage control. This manuscript documents the pathogenetic back grounds and the clinical results leading to a change in the management of orthopaedic injuries towards damage control.

Background: The aim of this study is to assess the associations between the timing of secondary definitive fracture surgery on inflammatory changes and outcome in the patient with multiple injuries. The study population consists of a series of patients with multiple injuries who were managed using a strategy of primary temporary skeletal stabilization followed by delayed definitive fracture fixation., Methods: In a prospective cohort study performed at a Level I trauma center, the patients' injuries and operative details as well as immune markers and clinical outcomes were studied. The patients were split into an early secondary surgery group (group ESS, surgery at days 2-4) and a late secondary surgery group (group LSS, surgery at days 5-8). During the posttraumatic course, inflammatory markers (interleukin [IL]-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha) were determined on a daily basis. Perioperatively, these markers were additionally evaluated at 30 minutes, 7 hours, and 24 hours after initiation of surgery., Results: Secondary surgery on days 2 to 4 was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative organ dysfunction (n = 33 [46.5%]) than secondary surgery on days 5 to 8 (n = 9 [15.7%], p = 0.01). A significant association between the combination of initial IL-6 values > 500 pg/dL plus surgery on days 2 to 4 and the development of multiple organ failure (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) occurred. A correlation between the initial IL-6 values > 500 pg/dL and surgery on days 5 to 8 (r = 0.57, p < 0.07) could not be found. IL-6 also demonstrated a predictive value for the development of multiple organ failure: IL-6 > 500 pg/dL in group ESS, r = 0.96, p < 0.001; IL-6 > 500 pg/dL in group LSS, r = 0.57, p < 0.07., Conclusion: According to our data, no distinct clinical advantage in carrying out secondary definitive fracture fixation early could be determined. In contrast, in patients who demonstrated initial IL-6 values above 500 pg/dL, it may be advantageous to delay the interval between primary temporary fracture stabilization and secondary definitive fracture fixation for more than 4 days. In patients with blunt multiple injuries undergoing primary temporary fixation of major fractures, the timing of secondary definitive surgery should be carefully selected, because it may act as a second hit phenomenon and cause a deterioration of the clinical status.

We evaluated retrospectively the long-term results of isolated calcaneal fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation and a primary subtalar arthrodesis. From 1990 to 1997 258 patients were treated with a calcaneal fracture, for the current study six patients were included. Six different surgeons operated on the patients. The indication for the fusion was based on the comminution of the posterior facet according to the preoperative CT as well as the intraoperative evaluation of destruction of the cartilage. The restoration of length, axes and angles of the calcaneus was almost anatomical in all cases. Follow-up was done at a mean of 4.9 (2.5 - 7.5 years). Using the AOFAS score, the results were good or excellent in five patients. In one patient with a painful arthritis in the talonavicular joint and hyperesthesia of the sural nerve, the results were fair. All returned to their profession within 9 months and had no or only minor daily restrictions. The results are comparable with single surgeon series. We found open reconstruction of the calcaneus with primary fusion of the subtalar joint may be indicated in selected patients and, in these 6 patients led to good results.

The post-traumatic osteolysis of the distal clavicle is very infrequent and the etiology and pathology is poorly understood. It is important to consider this possibility for differential diagnosis when continued pain in the acromio-clavicular joint (AC joint) follows blunt shoulder trauma. The course of the disease may result in a 3 cm loss of length of the distal clavicle. Months and years may pass until osteolysis becomes manifest, but the earliest radiological findings are present 4 weeks after trauma. The disease is self-limiting and usually does not leave residues. We report a case of a 35-year-old man with a post-traumatic osteolysis of the distal clavicle after blunt shoulder trauma. The diagnosis was determined several months after pain persisted in his shoulder. Using this case we discuss the possible pathogenic mechanism, differential diagnosis and treatment options for the post-traumatic osteolysis of the distal clavicle.

Within the last decade understanding of the pathogenetic consequences of trauma has been improved significantly. An additional reduction of lethality has been achieved that in part is related to increasing discrimination of complex injury patterns. Accordingly, additional staging in fracture management of these injuries has been developed. An overview of the current status of fracture management in polytrauma is given and certain regimens that are still controversially are discussed. The principles determined are based on the treatment experience of 4003 multiply injured patients within the past 23 years. The most important principles within the first hours after trauma represent adequate hemorrhage control. In fracture treatment the primary goal remains to perform primary stable osteosynthesis. In severe polytrauma with severe injuries to the extremities, the first decision is whether limb salvage can be achieved without risk of deterioration of the patient's condition. If this is the case, open fractures Grades III b and c usually can be stabilized primarily by unreamed intramedullary nailing or percutaneous plating. The priority pattern in multiple closed fractures is as follows: (1) tibia; (2) femur; (3) pelvis; (4) spine; and (5) upper extremity. Exceptions may ensue if severe head or thoracic trauma is present. Delayed treatment is performed for complex joint reconstruction, definitive treatment of maxillofacial injuries, and soft tissue reconstruction.