Search

The article discusses six data matches which have been mandated as part of the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). These include the Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, National Directory of New Hires, the Social Security Administration Prisoner Verification System, and the Social Security Administration Dean Master File.

The article focuses on state agency falsification of quality control data in the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). It states that at least three state agencies are engaged in fraud related to quality control data falsification since 2008, according to the Department of Justice. It also mentions that several states are still under investigation for fraud, according to Ann M. Coffey of the Department of Agriculture-Office of Inspector General.

The article discusses false claims by U.S. state agencies regarding Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) quality control (QC) data and state payment error rates. It states that the QC process begins with state agency analyses which determine state payment error rates, which the Department of Agriculture-Food and Nutrition Service to develop the SNAP national payment errot rate.

The article outlines the penalties associated with recipient fraud in the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as of March 2018. These include the restitution of benefits defrauded, disqualication from any federal, stat or local means-tested public assistance program, and criminal charges and penalties.

The article focuses on the certain store owners who remain active in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) despite permanent disqualification for trafficking due to a longstanding U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food and Nutrition Service (USDA-FNS) policy. It states that USDA-Office of the Inspector General proposed for a change to SNAP regulations and USDA-FNS policy to permanent disqualify all stores associated with an owner of a store that is permanently disqualified.

The article outlines the ways in which U.S. state agencies detect recipient fraud in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as of March 2018. These include through an analysis of electronic transaction data, undercover investigations, and multiple card replacement. Other means include state law enforcement bureau agreements between state agencies and law enforcement entities, tips and referrals, and data matching.

The article focuses on the detection of U.S. agency errors in the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by ongoing, independent process improvements, supervisory case review, process improvements and recipients.

The article discusses the importance of providing state agencies with advance notification regarding the retailer trafficking investigation conducted by the Food and Nutrition Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

The article notes that the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food and Nutrition Service will deny retailer's application if it fails to meet requirements such as stocking and business integrity standards and falsification, which could lead to a permanent disqualification from program participation.

The article discusses how the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food and Nutrition Service (USDA-FNS) detect retailer application fraud.

The article focuses on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Office of the Inspector General (USDA-OIG) investigation of state agency employee fraud, and the criminal penalties for the crime.

The article outlines several ways in which U.S. state agencies detect recipient fraud in the U.S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). These include an analysis of electronic benefit transfer (EBT) transaction data, the use of social media and online commerce websites by individuals attempting to traffic SNAP benefits, and undercover investigations.