Search

Studies in healthy individuals indicate a significant influence of rotating visual motion on judgments of the subjective visual vertical (SVV). Moreover, sensory stimulation manoeuvres like horizontal coherent dot movement significantly modulate horizontal spatial deficits in patients with rightsided stroke. Here, we investigated whether rotational coherent dot movement (RCDM) modulates spatial orientation deficits of the SVV in the roll plane in right hemispheric stroke. We tested the perceptual judgment of the SVV in 20 patients with right-hemispheric, first ever stroke (10 of them with a disorder of the SVV and 10 without a disorder), and 10 healthy, age-matched subjects under three experimental conditions: (1) with a static background of small white dots, (2) with slow clockwise or (3) counterclockwise circular RCDM of these background stimuli. In the baseline condition with static background, the impaired patient group showed a counterclockwise tilt of the SVV. Clockwise RCDM normalized this deficit completely, while with counterclockwise RCDM a slight aggravation was observed. Similar but quantitatively much smaller effects were obtained in the SVV-unimpaired patients and the healthy individuals. These results demonstrate a strong modulatory effect of RCDM on the SVV in patients with a tilt of the SVV due to right-sided stroke. RCDM thus appears to influence higher spatial representations devoted to visuospatial perception of the SVV. Possible mechanisms as well as clinical implications for therapy of visuospatial disorientation (self-orientation in space) after stroke are discussed., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Spatial deficits are frequent after brain damage, particularly right hemisphere stroke. Visual judgments of line orientation (LINE) are often impaired after right parietal lesions. Perception of line orientation is an important visuoperceptual component of visuoconstructive capacities. Yet, little is known about modulating factors in LINE and effective treatments are rare for this disorder. Studies in patients with spatial neglect show that horizontal random dot motion (RDM) significantly modulates horizontal spatial disorders, both transiently and permanently after treatment. In the current study, we investigated whether rotational RDM modulates judgements in an oblique LINE task in 20 patients with right-hemispheric first ever stroke (10 of them with a disorder in LINE and 10 without such a disorder), and 10 healthy, age-matched subjects. Subjects were tested under three experimental conditions: (1) with a static background of small white dots, (2) with slow clockwise or (3) counterclockwise circular RDM of these background stimuli, while they performed the LINE task. In the baseline condition with static background, the impaired patient group showed a significant counterclockwise tilt. Clockwise rotating RDM normalized this deficit transiently but completely, while counterclockwise rotating RDM slightly aggravated it, though not significantly. Tilts in the LINE task were significantly correlated with left visuospatial neglect. Similar but much smaller effects were obtained in the spatially unimpaired patients and the normal controls. These results show that rotational RDM modulates deficits of line orientation in patients with right-sided stroke, possibly by influencing higher spatial representations devoted to the perception of oblique lines., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Neglect patients show contralesional deficits in egocentric and object-centred visuospatial tasks. The extent to which these different phenomena are modulated by sensory stimulation remains to be clarified. Subliminal galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) induces imperceptible, polarity-specific changes in the cortical vestibular systems without the unpleasant side effects (nystagmus, vertigo) induced by caloric vestibular stimulation. While previous studies showed vestibular stimulation effects on egocentric spatial neglect phenomena, such effects were rarely demonstrated in object-centred neglect. Here, we applied bipolar subsensory GVS over the mastoids (mean intensity: 0.7mA) to investigate its influence on egocentric (digit cancellation, text copying), object-centred (copy of symmetrical figures), or both (line bisection) components of visual neglect in 24 patients with unilateral right hemisphere stroke. Patients were assigned to two patient groups (impaired vs. normal in the respective task) on the basis of cut-off scores derived from the literature or from normal controls. Both groups performed all tasks under three experimental conditions carried out on three separate days: (a) sham/baseline GVS where no electric current was applied, (b) left cathodal/right anodal (CL/AR) GVS and (c) left anodal/right cathodal (AL/CR) GVS, for a period of 20min per session. CL/AR GVS significantly improved line bisection and text copying whereas AL/CR GVS significantly ameliorated figure copying and digit cancellation. These GVS effects were selectively observed in the impaired- but not in the unimpaired patient group. In conclusion, subliminal GVS modulates ego- and object-centred components of visual neglect rapidly. Implications for neurorehabilitation are discussed., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Stroke of the right cerebral hemisphere often causes deficits in the judgement of the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective tactile vertical (STV) which are related to central vestibular functioning. Clinically, deficits in the SVV/STV are linked to balance problems and poor functional outcome. Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) is a non-invasive, save stimulation technique that induces polarity-specific changes in the cortical vestibular systems. Subliminal GVS induces imperceptible vestibular stimulation without unpleasant side effects. Here, we applied bipolar subliminal GVS over the mastoids (mean intensity: 0.7 mA, 20 min duration per session) to investigate its online-influence on constant errors, difference thresholds and range values in the SVV and STV. 24 patients with subacute, single, unilateral right hemisphere stroke were studied and assigned to two patient groups (impaired vs. normal in the SVV and STV) on the basis of cut-off scores from healthy controls. Both groups performed these tasks under three experimental conditions on three different days: a) sham GVS where electric current was applied only for 30s and then turned off, b) left-cathodal GVS and c) right-cathodal GVS, for a period of 20 min per session. Left-cathodal GVS, but not right-cathodal GVS significantly reduced all parameters in the SVV. Concerning STV GVS also reduced constant error and range numerically, though not significantly. These effects occurred selectively in the impaired patient group. In conclusion, we found that GVS rapidly influences poststroke verticality deficits in the visual and tactile modality, thus highlighting the importance of the vestibular system in the multimodal elaboration of the subjective vertical., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Neglect patients often omit or misread initial letters of single words, a phenomenon termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Omissions of whole words on the contralesional side of the page during paragraph reading are generally considered as egocentric or space-based errors, whereas misreading of the left part of a word can be viewed as a type of stimulus-centred or word-based, neglect-related error. The research of the last decades shed light on several effects of word features (such as written word frequency, grammatical class or concreteness) that modulate the severity of ND. Nevertheless, almost all studies about those modulating factors were case studies and some of them have not been replicated yet. Therefore, to date we do not know how relevant such effects of different word stimuli are for a population of ND patients. Knowing their incidence would improve our theoretical understanding of ND and promote the development of standardized ND assessments, which are lacking so far. In particular, case studies have shown that ND error frequency increases systematically with word length (word length effect, WLE) while other single case studies found contrary results. Hence, the existence of the WLE in ND is unsettled and its incidence and significance in stroke patients is unknown. To clarify this issue we evaluated the relation between word length and the extent (number) of neglected or substituted letters within single words in ND (neglect dyslexia extent, NDE) in a group of 19 consecutive ND patients with right hemisphere lesions. We found a clear WLE in 79% (15 of 19) of our ND patients, as indicated by significant correlations between word length and NDE. Concurrent visual field defects had no effect on the WLE in our sample, thus showing no influence of early visual cortical processing stages on the WLE in neglect dyslexia. In conclusion, our results suggest a clear relationship between word length and reading errors in ND and show that the WLE is a frequent phenomenon in ND., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cancellation tasks and line bisection tasks are commonly used to diagnose spatial neglect after right hemisphere lesions. In such tasks, neglect patients often show leftsided omissions of targets in cancellation tests as well as a pathological rightward deviation in horizontal line bisection. However, double dissociations have also been reported and the relation between performance in both tasks is not clear. Another impairment frequently associated with the neglect syndrome are omissions or misread initial letters of single words, a phenomenon termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Omissions of whole words on the contralesional side of the page are generally considered as egocentric or space-based errors, whereas misreadings of the left part of a word in ND can be viewed as a type of stimulus-centered or word-based, perceptual error. As words, sentences and horizontal lines have a similar spatial layout in the sense that they all are horizontally aligned, long stimuli with a canonical left-right orientation (with a defined beginning on the left and an end on the right side), we hypothesized a significant association between the horizontal line bisection error (LBE) in neglect and the extent (number) of neglected or substituted letters within single words in ND (neglect dyslexia extension, NDE). To this purpose, we computed Center-of-Cancellation (CoC) scores in a cancellation task as well as Center-of-Reading (CoR) scores in an experimental paragraph reading test. We found that the CoR was a better indicator for egocentric word omissions than the CoC in a group of 17 patients with left visuospatial neglect. Furthermore, the LBE predicted the severity of ND, indicated by highly significant correlations between the LBE and the extent of the neglected letter string within single words (NDE; r=0.73, p<0.001) as well as between the LBE and the frequency of ND errors (r=0.61; p=0.009). In contrast, we found no significant correlation between the CoC and the severity of ND. These results indicate two different pathological mechanisms being responsible for contralesional spatial neglect and ND. In conclusion, the LBE is a more sensitive predictor of the presence and severity of the reading disorder in spatial neglect than conventional cancellation tasks., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with homonymous hemianopia often show a contralesional shift towards their blind field when bisecting horizontal lines ("hemianopic line bisection error", HLBE). The reasons for this spatial bias are not well understood and debated. Cueing of spatial attention modulates line bisection significantly in patients with visuospatial neglect. Moreover, recent evidence showed that attention training significantly improves deficits of visual search in hemianopia. Here, we tested in 20 patients with chronic homonymous hemianopia (10 left-sided, 10 right-sided) without visual neglect, 10 healthy control subjects, 10 neurological control patients, and 3 patients with left visuospatial neglect and leftsided hemianopia whether spatial cueing influences the HLBE. Subjects indicated verbally the midpoint of horizontal lines in a computerized line bisection task under four experimental cue positions (cue far left, mid-left, mid-right or far-right within the horizontal line). All 20 hemianopic patients showed the typical HLBE towards their blind field, while the two control samples showed only a small but significant leftward shift (pseudoneglect). None of the 4 cueing manipulations had a significant effect on the HLBE in the hemianopic patients. Moreover, no differential effects of cueing on line bisection results were obtained when analyzed in lesion subgroups of hemianopic patients with circumscribed occipital lesions (N=8) as contrasted with patients having more extended (occipito-temporal or temporal) lesions (N=12). This null-effect contrasts with marked cueing effects observed in 3 neglect patients with left hemianopia in the same tasks, showing the principal efficacy of our cueing manipulation. These results argue against attentional explanations of the HLBE., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with homonymous hemianopia often show a contralesional shift towards their blind field when bisecting horizontal lines ('hemianopic line bisection error', HLBE). The reasons for this spatial bias are not well understood and debated. Eccentric fixation and adaptive orienting of eye movements towards the blind field have been suggested as hypothetical explanations but were not tested experimentally yet. Moreover, the role of spatial attention and visual search in the blind field are unsettled issues. Here, we tested in 20 stroke patients with chronic homonymous hemianopia (10 left-sided, 10 right-sided) without visual neglect, 10 healthy control subjects and 10 neurological control patients without hemianopia whether the HLBE is related to (a) eccentric fixation and (b) is influenced by spatial-attentional cueing (left, right) and (c) related to the degree of oculomotor compensation in the blind field. Perimetric mapping of the blind spot in the ipsilesional eye was performed in 39/40 subjects. Both hemianopic patient groups showed the typical HLBE towards their blind field, while the two control samples showed only a small but significant leftward shift known as pseudoneglect. The horizontal and vertical position of the blind spot in the ipsilesional eye was within normal limits in 38 out of 40 subjects, and did not differ significantly between the four samples. Moreover, the HLBE was not significantly correlated to the horizontal or vertical position of the centre of the blind spot, thus excluding eccentric fixation as an explanation for this spatial error. Furthermore, spatial cueing by manipulating the starting position of the bisection cue (left, right) did not affect the HLBE, arguing against attentional cueing effects well known from the line bisection error in patients with spatial neglect. Finally, the size of the saccadic search field in the scotoma was not significantly correlated to the HLBE in hemianopia. We conclude that eccentric fixation, contralesional hyperattention or ipsilesional hypoattention, or good or poor oculomotor compensation of the field loss itself are not likely causes of the HLBE in chronic homonymous hemianopia. Implications of these findings and alternative explanations are discussed., (Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) modulates many facets of the neglect syndrome. This sensory stimulation technique is known to activate multiple brain regions (temporo-parietal cortex, basal ganglia, brain stem, cerebellum) some of which are involved in auditory and visual space coding. Here, we evaluated whether OKS modulates auditory neglect transiently and induces a sustained effect (Study 1), and whether repetitive OKS permanently recovers auditory neglect (Study 2). In Study 1, 20 patients with visuospatial neglect and auditory neglect in an auditory midline task following rightsided stroke were randomly allocated to an experimental and a control group matched for neglect severity and socio-demographic factors. Both groups showed a stable, pathological shift of their auditory subjective median plane (ASMP) in front space to the right side. During leftward OKS the experimental group showed a complete normalization of the shift of the ASMP, which endured until 30 min poststimulation, and returned almost to baseline values 24h after OKS. In contrast, the control group who viewed the identical but static dot pattern, showed neither change in their ASMP during this condition, nor any significant change at 30 min or 24h poststimulation. In Study 2, we show in two samples of neglect patients (N = 3 each) that repetitive leftward OKS with smooth pursuit eye movements as a therapy induces lasting improvements in auditory (the ASMP) and visual neglect while visual scanning therapy yielded no measurable effects on auditory and significantly smaller effects on visual neglect. In conclusion, the experiments show that a single session of OKS induces rapid though transient recovery from auditory neglect including a sustained effect after termination of stimulation, while repetitive OKS therapy yields enduring and multimodal recovery from auditory and visual neglect. OKS therapy with pursuit eye movements therefore represents a multimodally effective and easily applicable technique for the treatment of auditory and visual neglect., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with right hemisphere lesions often omit or misread words on the left side of a text or the initial letters of single words, a phenomenon termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Omissions of words on the contralesional side of the page are considered as egocentric or space-based errors, whereas misread words can be viewed as a type of stimulus-centered error where the left part of a single perceptual entity (the word) is neglected. Previous patient studies have shown that optokinetic stimulation (OKS) significantly modulates many facets of the neglect syndrome, including the subjective body midline, line bisection and size distortions. An open question is whether OKS can also influence omissions and stimulus-centered errors in paragraph reading in ND. The current study compared the influence of OKS on both types of reading errors using controlled indented paragraph reading tests in a group of 9 right-hemisphere lesioned patients with ND, 7 patients without ND and 9 matched healthy controls. Leftward OKS significantly reduced omissions on the left side of the text in ND. In contrast, the pattern of stimulus-centered reading errors remained unchanged. In conclusion egocentric manipulations like OKS only appear to influence space-based attentional processes evident as omissions in paragraph reading but have no impact on stimulus-centered attentional processes evident as word-based errors during paragraph reading in ND., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)