Search

To investigate the ideal digestive tract reconstruction methods among three different surgical methods after radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer patients.A total of 123 patients who received elective radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from February 2010 to August 2011 were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into radical proximal gastrectomy and jejunal interposition group, radical proximal gastrectomy and esophageal with the posterior of residual-stomach group, and radical total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy group. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Symptoms of reflux esophagitis were observed, gastric emptying tests were done, liver and kidney function was also monitored. The quality of life was documented before operation, and one and twelve months after operation.No significant differences were found among these three groups in the pH value of lower part of esophagus, the blood regular test results and the functional parameters of kidney and liver before and after operation(all P0.05). Symptoms of reflux esophagitis was reported in 1(2.4%) patients in the jejunal interposition group, 10(24.4%) in esophageal with the posterial of residual-stomach group, and 7(17.1%) in the Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy group(P=0.017). There was 1(2.4%), 10(17.1%), and 8(19.5%) patients presented reflux of barium meal in these three groups, respectively (P=0.046). There were no statistically significant difference in PH at the distal esophagus(6.9±0.2 vs. 6.8±0.1 vs. 6.9±0.1, P=0.196). The quality of life was significantly improved one year after surgery in terms of general status, physical function, emotional function, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, constipation, and diarrhea (all P0.05), with the jejunal interposition superior than the other two methods.Three methods of digestive tract reconstruction in radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer patients can improve the health status and the quality of life in gastric cancer patients. Radical proximal gastrectomy and jejunal interposition is the preferred method.

To explore an ideal method of digestive tract reconstruction and tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy after radical proximal gastrectomy.Thirty patients in the reconstruction group were treated by jejunal interposition, and other 30 patients received gastroesophagostomy (control group). The operation time, operation risk, occurrence of reflux esophagitis and postoperative 1-, 3-, 6-month nutrition statuses were evaluated. Forty-three patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX-6 and tolerance to the chemotherapy was assessed.The operation time of the reconstructional group was (162.2 ± 14.0)min and that of the control group was (137.6 ± 18.9)mi, with a statistically significant difference. (t = -5.7, P0.01). There were no significant differences of operation risk, postoperative 2-, 4-, and 6-day C-reactive protein, 2-, 4- and 6-day systemic inflammatory response syndrome between the two groups. The differences of the occurrence of postoperative 1-, 3- and 6-month reflux esophagitis and 3- and 6-month nutritional status between the two groups were statistically significant. 18 of 19 (94.7%) patients in the reconstruction group completed all six cycles of chemotherapy, 24 patients in the control group received chemotherapy, and 12 (50.0%) of them completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy. There was a significant difference in the completion rate of chemotherapy of the two groups (P0.05).The postoperative complications of jejunal interposition are not inceased, the symptoms of reflux esophagitis are alleviated, the quality of life can be improved, and there is a better tolerance to adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, jejunal interposition after radical proximal gastrectomy is a rational method of digestive tract reconstruction.

Background The current study sought to investigate the safety of intraoperative and early postoperative continuous hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion (IEPCHIP) at different temperatures in a swine model of experimental distal gastrectomy with Billroth II reconstruction. Methods Thirty pigs were randomly divided into 5 groups. Two groups were used as the control groups (groups A1 and A2), and 3 groups were used as the perfusion groups (groups B, C and D). Pigs in group A1 received distal gastrectomy with Billroth II reconstruction only. Pigs in groups A2, B, C and D received the same surgery as group A1, followed by IEPCHIP at 37 ± 0.5°C, 42.5 ± 0.5°C, 43.5 ± 0.5°C or 44.5 ± 0.5°C, respectively. The perfusion time was assessed for each pig in group A2 as well as in the perfusion groups, and the perfusions were performed twice for each group. The first perfusion was conducted intraoperatively, and the second perfusion was initiated 1 day after surgery. Data concerning vital signs and hepatic and renal function were collected. Parameters concerning anastomotic healing, the pathology of the anastomotic tissue and abdominal adhesion were compared. Results The vital signs and hepatic and renal functions of the pigs in groups A1, A2, B and C were not significantly affected by this procedure. In contrast, the vital signs and hepatic and renal functions of the pigs in group D were significantly affected. Compared to the pigs in groups A1, A2 or B, the anastomotic bursting pressure, breaking strength and hydroxyproline content in group C and D pigs were significantly lower. No significant differences were observed in these parameters between groups A1, A2 and B. Abdominal adhesion was more severe in group D pigs. Collagen deposition in group A1, A2 and B pigs was dense in the anastomosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in group D. Conclusions IEPCHIP at 42.5 ± 0.5°C was safe and caused minimal impairments. However, anastomotic healing was affected by perfusion at 43.5 ± 0.5°C and 44.5 ± 0.5°C, and abdominal adhesion was most severe in the group D animals, which were perfused at 44.5 ± 0.5°C.