Search

Background: Management of biliopancreatic pathology in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients is challenging despite the availability of multiple approaches like single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP (SBE-ERCP), laparoscopy-assisted ERCP (LA-ERCP), and EUS-directed transgastric intervention (EDGI). We evaluated the outcomes of the interchangeable combination of endoscopic procedures to treat biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients., Materials and Methods: This is a monocentric retrospective study of consecutive RYGB patients with biliopancreatic pathology between June 2014 and September 2023. Primary endpoints were technical success, adverse events (AE), and parameters of endoscopic procedures according to etiology. A clinically useful management algorithm was developed., Results: A total of 102 patients with RYGB (73 women; mean age 55 ± 10 years) were included. A total of 113 SBE-ERCP (in 90 patients), 26 EDGI (in 23 patients), and 2 LA-ERCP (in 2 patients) were performed. Technical success of SBE-ERCP was lower compared to EDGI (74.4% vs 95.1%, p = 0.002). The AE rate was lower using SBE-ERCP compared to EDGI (12.4% vs 38.5%, p = 0.003). Two sub-groups based on etiology were identified as "common bile duct stone" (CBDS) and "Other." In the CBDS group, the mean number and time of procedures were lower in SBE-ERCP as the first-line technique compared to first-line EDGI (1.1 vs 2.7, p < 0.00 and 91 ± 20.7 min vs 161 ± 61.3 min, p < 0.00)., Conclusion: A combination of endoscopic procedures can achieve high technical success in managing biliopancreatic pathology in RYGB patients with an acceptable AE rate. In the case of CBDS, SBE-ERCP appeared to be a good first-line single-step option. For other indications, EDGI should be proposed as the first line., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Weight loss failure or weight regain after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a challenge for bariatric surgeons. Failure to achieve a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m 2 after RYGB occurs in up to 40.0%. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of a novel technique for distalization of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRYGB) as a revisional procedure., Methods: Retrospective data were reviewed for 22 patients who had undergone RYGB and failed to achieve an excess weight loss (EWL) >50% or BMI <35 kg/m 2 and underwent limb distalization between 2013 and 2022. For this DRYGB procedure, the length of the common channel was 100 cm, and the lengths of the biliopancreatic limb and the alimentary limb were 1/3 and 2/3 of the remaining bowel, respectively., Results: The mean BMI values before and after DRYGB were 43.7 kg/m 2 and 33.5 kg/m 2 , respectively. Five years after DRYGB, mean % EWL was 74.3% and mean % total weight loss (TWL) was 28.8%. Mean % EWL and mean % TWL of the two procedures (RYGB and DRYGB) after 5 years were 80.9% and 44.7%, respectively. Three patients experienced protein calorie malnutrition. One was reproximalized and the others were treated with parenteral nutrition with no recurrence. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of diabetes type 2 and dyslipidemia after DRYGB., Conclusion: The DRYGB procedure results in substantial and sustained long-term weight loss. Due to the risk of malnutrition, patients must be strictly followed for life after the procedure., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: In the literature, up to 20% of patients present a failure of weight loss after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) or other restrictive procedures. Our aim is to describe the midterm results of our novel technique of distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRYGBP) as a revisional procedure., Materials and Methods: We performed our DRYGBP in 21 patients. The length of the common channel was 100 cm, whereas the lengths of the alimentary and the biliopancreatic limbs were 2/3 and 1/3 of the remaining bowel, respectively. We created 2 subgroups, a "revisional" group after failed restrictive procedures and a "distalization" group after failed RYGBP., Results: The mean excess weight loss at 12 months in the "revisional" group (10 patients) was 67.8% and in the "distalization" group (11 patients) 57.1%. We did not experience any mortality nor severe morbidity rates., Conclusions: In our experience, our DRYGBP differentiated procedure seems to be effective at 12 months.

Aims: To compare the perioperative parameters and excess weight loss between patients operated by laporoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), as a primary operation or a revisional, for insufficient weight loss after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) or adjustable gastric banding (AGB)., Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a LRYGB was performed for the period 2004-2011. Demographics, preoperative body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, operation time, conversion rate, perioperative complications, hospitalization period, and % of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) were investigated and compared between groups., Results: Three hundred forty-two laparoscopic gastric bypass operations were performed, 245 were primary, and 97 revisional. Median follow-up was 30 months (range 0-108 months). Mean BMI (kg/m 2 ) before bypass was 45.2 for primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (pLRYGB) and 41.1 for revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rLRYGB). Median operative time and length of stay were longer for rLRYGB 157.5 versus 235 min (p < 0.001) and 6 versus 6.5 days (p = 0.05). Conversion to laparotomy was performed in eight patients, 0.4% of primary and 7.2% of revisional. Morbidity rate was 6.5% in pLRYGB versus 10% in rLRYGB (NS). There was one death in the primary group. Percentage of EBMIL was significantly lower in the revisional group at 12, 18, and 24 months of follow-up., Conclusions: Revisional and primary gastric bypass have no statistical differences in terms of morbidity. The % of excess BMI loss is lower after revisional gastric bypass during the first 2 years of follow-up. The trend of weight loss or weight regain was similar in both groups.

Background: Vertically banded gastroplasty or adjustable gastric banding often result in weight regain, complications, or side effects. Failed restrictive bariatric procedures can be converted in revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). This study aimed to compare weight loss, evolution of comorbidities, and quality of life (QOL) between primary versus revisional LRYGB., Methods: Between 2004 and 2012, 374 patients underwent LRYGB as primary or revisional surgery performed by a single surgeon. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed; questionnaires of QOL were sent to all patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) taking into account excess body mass index loss (EBMIL), correction of comorbidities, improvement in QOL, and complications., Results: Two hundred thirty-two patients (62%) responded to the questionnaire, 163 patients in the primary group and 69 in the revisional group. Median follow-up was 36 months (12-108). Median percentages of EBMIL were, respectively, 74% (26.8-126.8) and 50% (-31.6-124.2) in the primary and the revisional groups (p < 0.01). Median BAROS score reached 6.5 (-2-9) in the primary group, against 4.3 (-1.8-9) in the revisional group (p < 0.01). There were significantly less "fair" and more "excellent" scores in the primary group, considering initial BMI before gastroplasty. Arterial hypertension and sleep apnea syndrome resolved, respectively, in 51 and 56% in the primary group and only in 29 and 33% in the revisional group (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: According to BAROS score, revisional LRYGB for failed restrictive procedures provided poorer results than primary LRYGB in terms of weight loss, resolution of comorbidities and QOL.

This article, published in the journal Endoscopy, discusses three cases of misdeployment during an EDGI procedure and the successful use of endoscopic salvage techniques to treat them. The misdeployment occurred during the creation of a gastrogastrostomy fistula, with the distal flange migrating into the peritoneal cavity. Two different techniques, "Remove and Replace" and "LAMS in LAMS," were used to address the issue. The authors suggest that the "LAMS in LAMS" technique may be easier and reduce the risk of losing access, but further studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness. [Extracted from the article]