Search

The cause of foregut symptoms is often quite uncertain until a comprehensive evaluation has been performed. The critical elements of this evaluation include historic, radiographic, endoscopic, and physiologic data, and most importantly, the insight of a mature diagnostician. Patients who are not evaluated in a comprehensive way are at risk for serious postoperative problems; surgeons who perform interventions without appropriate diagnostic support may have to deal with these unhappy patients. In the long run, a complete workup provides the guidance for treatment and is cost-effective.

Computerized axial manometry (CAM) of the lower esophagus measures squeeze pressure at multiple points in each segment of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), calculates several unique parameters of LES function, and constructs a 3-D display of the LES. Whether parameters derived from CAM, such as the radial mean pressure (LESrmp), Asymmetry (Asym), and Vector Volume (VV), have relevance to function of the LES remains undefined. This study compares the results of CAM in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and controls. There were 54 patients with GERD and 21 volunteers; all underwent CAM as part of their evaluation; GERD was defined by clinical and endoscopic examinations, and all patients had abnormal 24-hour pH tests. Statistical evaluation was performed. The LESrmp and the Vector Volume were significantly correlated in both groups of patients and differed significantly in both. Asymmetry of the LES was a significant negative factor in LES strength as shown by VV and LESrmp. Asymmetry alone, however, did not show a strong correlation with reflux. Asymmetry is indirectly correlated with the major determinants of LES strength; in patients with low VV, asymmetry might be a critical factor. When a high VV is present, asymmetry has no particular relevance. CAM provides invaluable measurements of the LES.

We have previously reported that endoscopic sclerosis of the gastric cardia is an effective treatment for experimental gastroesophageal reflux in dogs. The histologic effect of endoscopic sclerosis is limited to the proximal stomach; mucosal deformity provides endoscopic evidence of sclerosis, and the intramural effects are shown by ultrasonographic technique. This report describes histologic and ultrasonographic results in the dogs at the completion of endoscopic sclerosis. This report also describes the endoscopic ultrasound results in the first two patients who have completed endoscopic treatment for reflux by means of endoscopic sclerosis of the gastric cardia. All canine and human subjects had sonodense lesions involving all layers of the proximal stomach at the injection site at the conclusion of treatment. Histologic examination of canine tissues showed dense submucosal and muscularis fibrosis in the stomach; the esophagus was normal. Endoscopic ultrasound demonstrates the effect of endoscopic sclerosis; this technique may be useful in the evaluation of symptomatic responses after this treatment.

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease is a common disorder which sometimes requires surgical treatment. Until recently, surgical treatment was the only alternative for severe complications of reflux. During the past 5 years endoscopic treatments for reflux have been reported from several medical centers. These new approaches may herald a new era for the treatment of reflux complications. However, at this time they are purely experimental approaches. Since physiologic antireflux mechanisms involve the muscles of the proximal gastric cardia as well as those of the lower esophageal sphincter, it is not surprising that endoscopic treatments have been directed at these two areas. However, the first endoscopic attempts at reflux control were directed at the lower esophagus sphincter. The most recent efforts at endoscopic control have been aimed at the proximal stomach, based on the concept that scarification beneath the lower end of the esophagus reduces the amount or frequency of reflux. Neither of these latter approaches has been reported in human patients. Since all endoscopic approaches are potentially dangerous, we recommend the adoption of a rigorous protocol for all human application. A possible protocol for this purpose is described herein; the authors will provide data analysis for any cohort of patients receiving endoscopic therapy, and will provide the results of all endoscopic treatments to any serious investigators.

Surgical anti-reflux therapy appears to involve the muscles of the proximal gastric cardia and those of the lower esophageal sphincter. In an experimental canine reflux model, we injected sclerosant solution into the submucosa of the proximal gastric cardia, hypothesizing that the subsequent fibrotic reaction might exert an anti-reflux effect. Reflux was induced by atropine infusion, and the amount of reflux was quantitated by pH monitoring. Endoscopic sclerosis was effective in preventing reflux induced by high-dose atropine. Because the length and pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter were unaffected by endoscopic treatment, reflux prevention was possibly related to enhancement of the gastric component of the reflux barrier.

Endoscopic sclerosis of the gastric cardia (ESGC) prevents experimental gastroesophageal reflux (GER) without changes in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and length. This study was performed to define the histologic appearance of the esophagus and stomach one year after ESGC. Four dogs were studied one year after ESGC with morrhuate sodium; ESGC had been performed at six sites, 1-3 cm distal to the esophagogastric junction. All animals had stable weight and eating habits at sacrifice. Light microscopy of the cardia and LES included morphometry of wall thickness (mm) and assessment of fibrosis (- to ). The esophagus had minimal changes; the gastric cardia had focal fibrosis, maximal on the greater curve, without any change difference in wall thickness. ESGC results in fibrosis of the gastric cardia, without significant changes in the esophagus. These changes prevent GER, possibly by preventing the initiation of a reflux event.

Prolonged intraesophageal pH monitoring is considered by some to be the most sensitive and specific test of gastroesophageal reflux. We prospectively examined the ability of the test to discriminate 64 hospitalized patients with typical reflux symptoms from 20 age-matched hospitalized control subjects. Patients were subdivided based on endoscopic findings into two groups: group 1, normal endoscopy (n = 30); group 2, erosive esophagitis (n = 34). Six different individual reflux variables and a scoring system were evaluated. Total esophageal acid exposure time and the number of reflux episodes requiring longer than 5 min to clear were each found to have greater discriminatory power than other variables and the scoring system. Although the 64 patients had significantly more acid reflux than controls, only 48% had abnormal results (defined as 2 SD from the control mean). Group 1 patients had significantly more reflux than controls, though only 21% had abnormal results. Group 2 patients were significantly different than both controls and group 1, but 29% had normal studies. Ninety-three percent of the group 1 patients with normal studies responded to antireflux therapy, and only 1 patient had another explanation for the symptoms. The finding that 24-h pH monitoring was normal in half of the individuals presenting with reflux symptoms and in 29% of the patients with erosive esophagitis indicates that negative test results must be interpreted with caution. The insensitivity of the test may relate to the manner in which the study has traditionally been performed in the hospital, and outpatient ambulatory monitoring may improve its reliability.

This is a presentation of a new manometric parameter of the mechanical competence of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), the lower esophageal sphincter vector volume (LESVV). It is determined by computer analysis of continuous-pressure measurements during constant speed pullback of a radially oriented 4- 6- or 8-channel manometry catheter across the LES. Patients were studied with this method both before aggressive medical therapy for esophagitis and before and after Nissen fundoplication. LESVV accurately predicted failure of medical therapy and success of the fundoplication. In patients with successful fundoplication, LESVV demonstrated a 100-fold increase in mechanical competence of the LES, even in the absence of increased LES pressure or length, increasing from 113 +/- 63 mm3 to 11357 +/- 3733 mm3.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease remains a disorder of unknown etiology associated with abnormal function of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and other physiological co-factors of the pathologic reflux. Effective operations for reflux are designed to reinforce the anti-reflux barrier and alter the tendency towards abnormal reflux. We have postulated that the most important component of these procedures is the prevention of distraction of the lowermost components of the LES at the onset of a potential reflux episode. Distraction of the LES causes shortening of the effective sphincter mechanism and can initiate experimental reflux events. In this study we used endoscopic sclerosis of the submucosal space at the cardia as a means of reducing distraction of the cardia in the hope that this would reduce abnormal reflux events. Canine gastroesophageal reflux was induced by intravenous atropine and monitored by continuous esophageal pH monitoring. Sclerosis of the cardia prevented gastroesophageal reflux, without measurable effect on the LES pressure or length. Endoscopic sclerosis of the cardia may be a useful technique in the control of human gastroesophageal reflux.