Search

Introduction: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly performed in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). An EGD report should document pertinent findings such as esophagitis, a columnar-lined esophagus (CLE), the location of the squamo-columnar and gastroesophageal junctions, the size and type of a hiatal hernia and the number and location of any biopsies. The aim of this study was to evaluate how commonly these findings were noted in the EGD reports of patients referred for antireflux surgery., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patient charts from 2012 to 2015 to identify 100 consecutive EGD reports from different endoscopists in different patients. Each EGD report was reviewed for pertinent findings and the use of a classification system for esophagitis (Savory-Miller or Los Angeles) and for reporting a CLE (Prague)., Results: In 100 EGD reports, esophagitis was noted in 33 patients, but was graded in only 14 (42%). A CLE was noted in 28 patients, but the length was reported in only 16 (57%) and no report used the Prague classification system. A hiatal hernia was noted in 61 patients, measured in 31 (51%) and the type classified in 26%. A biopsy was taken in 93 patients and the location noted in 86 patients (93%). The number of biopsies was recorded in only 20 patients (22%). In 12 patients the EGD was for Barrett's surveillance, yet a Seattle biopsy protocol was reported to be used in only 3 patients., Conclusion: Endoscopy reports frequently do not include the use of a grading system for esophagitis or the Prague system for CLE. This hampers the assessment of change with therapy or over time. The size of a hiatal hernia was typically reported in a subjective fashion and only infrequently was the type specified. Lack of clarity about the presence of a paraesophageal hernia can impede evaluation of acute symptoms. In patients with Barrett's esophagus a standard biopsy protocol was infrequently reported to be used. These findings raise concern about the quality of upper endoscopy, both in the performance of the procedure and the documentation of findings. A consistent reporting system is recommended for routine use with upper endoscopy.

Typical reflux symptoms that respond well to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy are key factors predictive of an excellent outcome with antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Our aim was to evaluate whether poor preoperative heartburn (HB) relief with PPIs was associated with a worse outcome after Nissen fundoplication. Patients with a main symptom of HB and a positive pH-test who had a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between January 2008 and December 2014 were included. Prior to surgery, patients graded how effectively their HB symptoms were relieved by PPIs. Three groups were defined: good response (76-100% relief), partial response (26-75% relief) and poor response (0-25% relief). Outcomes and satisfaction were assessed at a minimum of 1 year after fundoplication. There were 129 patients who met inclusion criteria and 75 agreed to participate. The median follow-up was 48 months. Prior to Nissen fundoplication 13 patients had a good HB response to PPI-therapy, 36 had a partial response and 26 had a poor response. All patients were satisfied with their HB relief after fundoplication (mean satisfaction score: 9.5/10) and there was no difference in satisfaction score or heartburn relief between groups. Heartburn symptoms that respond poorly to PPI therapy are reliably relieved with a Nissen fundoplication in patients with objectively confirmed GERD. Patient satisfaction after Nissen fundoplication was excellent and was similar in patients with poor versus excellent HB relief with preoperative PPI therapy. Therefore, antireflux surgery is an option for patients with HB and confirmed GERD regardless of the degree of relief of HB symptoms provided by PPI medications., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Protracted dysphagia and bloating are potential troublesome side effects following Nissen fundoplication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of conversion from Nissen to Toupet on dysphagia and bloating., Methods: The study used a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone conversion from Nissen to Toupet between 2001 and 2014. Endpoints were to determine the effect of conversion on dysphagia, bloating, and reflux control., Results: Twenty-five patients underwent conversion at a median of 3.7 years (1.4-10.5) after initial fundoplication. Indications were dysphagia in 19 (76%) and bloating syndrome in 6 (24%) patients. The median operative time was 104 min (86-146). There were no serious complications or mortality. Median follow-up was 27 months (0.8-130). Dysphagia was relieved in 16 (84%) and bloating in all 6 patients. Two patients developed reflux requiring a redo-Nissen. Two patients had persistent dysphagia and required endoscopic dilation. The GERD-HRQL post-conversion showed a median score of 5 (3-13)., Conclusions: Conversion relieved dysphagia in 84% and bloating in 100%. Significant recurrence of GERD was rare. Given the absence of serious complications, conversion should be considered in patients with severe bloating or dysphagia.

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease can be associated with extraesophageal symptoms (hoarseness, cough, asthma, and globus). However, these symptoms may have a multifactorial etiology. Proximal pH monitoring has been proposed as a means of identifying patients where reflux is the cause of the extraesophageal symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine whether proximal esophageal or pharyngeal pH monitoring better identified patients with extraesophageal symptoms that improved after antireflux surgery., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who had esophageal and pharyngeal pH monitoring before an antireflux operation. A composite score was used to define an abnormal result with each test. A successful outcome was defined as improvement or resolution of extraesophageal symptoms., Results: There were 20 patients identified. Antireflux surgery led to a successful outcome in 14 patients (70 %). Restech better identified patients with extraesophageal symptoms who had a successful outcome with antireflux surgery (12 of 14 [86 %] based on abnormal Restech versus 5 of 10 [50 %] based on abnormal proximal probe, p = 0.06). Comparing only the 15 patients who had both proximal esophageal and pharyngeal pH monitoring, Restech again better identified those who had a successful outcome with antireflux surgery (9 of 10 [90 %] based on abnormal Restech versus 5 of 10 [50 %] based on abnormal proximal probe, p = 0.05). The positive and negative predictive values for symptomatic improvement after a fundoplication were better for an abnormal Restech score than for an abnormal proximal esophageal score (80 vs. 71 % and 60 vs. 38 %, respectively). In two patients with a successful outcome, Restech was the only positive test., Conclusions: In patients with extraesophageal reflux symptoms, proximal esophageal pH monitoring failed to identify half of the patients who had a successful outcome after antireflux surgery. In contrast, an abnormal Restech pH test was present in 90 % of patients with a successful outcome. Further, a negative Restech study more reliably indicated the absence of reflux-induced extraesophageal symptoms. Our results indicate that Restech pharyngeal pH monitoring should be utilized in the evaluation of patients with extraesophageal symptoms that may be associated with reflux disease.

Background: The Bravo capsule allows monitoring of esophageal acid exposure over a two-day period. Experience has shown that 24-32% of patients will have abnormal esophageal acid exposure detected on only one of the 2 days monitored. This variation has been explained by the effect of endoscopy and sedation. The aim of this study was to assess the day-to-day discrepancy following transnasal placement of the Bravo capsule without endoscopy or sedation and to determine factors related to this variability., Methods: Bravo pH monitoring was performed by transnasal placement of the capsule in 310 patients. Patients were divided into groups based on the composite pH score: both days normal, both days abnormal and only one of the 2 days abnormal. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics were compared between groups., Results: Of the 310 patients evaluated, 60 (19%) showed a discrepancy between the 2 days. A total of 127 patients had a normal pH score on both days and 123 had an abnormal pH score on both days. Of the 60 patients with a discrepancy, 27 were abnormal the first day and 33 (55%) were abnormal the second day. Patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure on both days had higher degrees of esophageal acid exposure and were more likely to have a defective LES compared to those with an abnormal score on only one day (35 vs. 83%, p=0.027)., Conclusion: Patients with a discrepancy between days of Bravo pH monitoring have lower esophageal acid exposure. Variability between the 2 days represents early deterioration of the gastroesophageal barrier and indicates less advanced reflux disease.

Background and Aims: Exaggerated pressure fluctuation between the thorax and abdomen during exercise or with pulmonary disease may challenge the gastroesophageal barrier and allow reflux of gastric juice into the esophagus. The aim of this study was to investigate the pressure differentials in the region of the gastroesophageal junction to better understand the relationship between the thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) barrier function., Methods: We reviewed the esophageal motility and 24-h pH studies in 151 patients with a manometrically normal lower esophageal sphincter who did not have pulmonary disease, history of anti-reflux surgery, hiatal hernia, or ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Intra-abdominal gastric and intra-thoracic esophageal pressure fluctuations with respiration were measured and the thoraco-abdominal pressure gradients were calculated during both inspiratory and expiratory phases of the respiratory cycle. Predictive factors for an abnormal composite pH score were identified by multivariable analysis., Results: An inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient that was higher than the resting LES pressure was found in 27 patients. In 23 of these patients (85.2%) there was increased esophageal acid exposure (OR 13.5, 95% CI 4.4-41.8). An abnormal composite pH score was predicted by a high inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient (P < 0.001), greater fluctuation between inspiratory and expiratory thoracic pressure (P = 0.023), lower LES resting pressure (P = 0.049) and a decreased residual pressure after a swallow induced relaxation (P = 0.002)., Conclusions: The gastroesophageal barrier function of the LES can be overcome during times when the inspiratory thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient is increased, leading to reflux of gastric juice into the esophagus. This implies that exaggerated ventilatory effort, as occurs with exercise or in respiratory disease, can result in gastroesophageal reflux.

Hypothesis: Peripheral blood eosinophil count increases with the degree of mucosal injury associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)., Design: Retrospective review., Setting: Single-institution tertiary hospital., Patients: Two hundred ninety-five patients (215 men and 80 women; median age, 57 years [interquartile range (IQR), 46-66 years]). One hundred had GERD without intestinal metaplasia, 100 had GERD with intestinal metaplasia, 40 had GERD with dysplasia, and 55 had GERD with intramucosal carcinoma. Results of complete blood count with differential and serum chemistry studies were compared among the groups using a nonparametric test for trend., Results: Patients with a higher degree of mucosal injury were older (P < .001). There were no differences between white blood count, percent neutrophil count, absolute neutrophil count, and hematocrit levels among the groups. Serum albumin level decreased as the degree of mucosal injury increased (P = .04) but lost significance when controlled for age (P = .53). Percent eosinophil counts were 2.0 (IQR, 1.3-2.8) in patients with GERD without intestinal metaplasia, 2.5 (IQR, 1.6-3.7) in GERD with intestinal metaplasia, 2.6 (IQR, 1.7-4.4) in GERD with dysplasia, and 2.7 (IQR, 1.5-4.3) in GERD with intramucosal carcinoma. This progressive increase in the percent eosinophil count was statistically significant (P = .006), remained significant after controlling for age (P = .04), and was also significant when measuring the absolute eosinophil count., Conclusion: There is a progressive increase in the percent and absolute peripheral blood eosinophil count associated with progressive mucosal injury in patients with GERD.

Background: In some patients GERD presents with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms but a relative paucity of endoscopic and clinical findings, while in others symptoms may be minor or absent yet there is significant mucosal damage on endoscopy including the presence of Barrett's esophagus. The initial injury of gastroesophageal reflux is to the squamous esophageal mucosa, but while substantial research has been devoted to determining which genes are involved in the progression of Barrett's to dysplasia and cancer, little is known about the gene expression alterations in the squamous mucosa of patients with reflux. We hypothesized that the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) might be increased in the squamous esophageal mucosal of patients with reflux, and might be a molecular indicator of reflux injury. Further, we hypothesized that Cox-2 expression in the squamous mucosa would be reduced following the elimination of reflux with an antireflux operation., Methods: Biopsies of the distal esophageal squamous mucosa were taken 3 cm above the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) in 28 GERD patients before and after Nissen fundoplication. Following microdissection and RNA isolation, quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure Cox-2 gene expression in paraffin-embedded (N = 16) and fresh frozen (N = 12) tissue. Biopsies from patients (paraffin N = 15, frozen N = 14) with normal acid exposure and no evidence of mucosal injury were analyzed as controls., Results: Median Cox-2 expression in the squamous epithelium from paraffin embedded biopsies in patients with reflux disease was significantly increased compared to controls (p = 0.04). The presence of esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus did not significantly alter the expression of Cox-2 compared to patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). After antireflux surgery median Cox-2 expression values were significantly reduced (p = 0.0003) and were normalized to levels similar to controls without reflux (p = 0.74). Similar results were observed in the prospectively obtained fresh frozen tissue., Conclusions: Cox-2 gene expression is increased in the distal esophageal squamous mucosa of most patients with GERD, and the elevation was similar whether there was mucosal injury in the form of esophagitis or Barrett's or no visible mucosal injury. This suggests that increased Cox-2 expression may serve as a molecular marker of reflux disease. The increased Cox-2 expression in patients with reflux was usually normalized following antireflux surgery. These findings demonstrate for the first time that gene expression can be altered by surgical correction of reflux. Thus, in addition to symptom control and improvement in the quality of life, perhaps future studies assessing the efficacy of antireflux therapy should also focus on the impact of the therapy on gene expression in the esophageal squamous mucosa.

The components of refluxed gastric juice are known to cause mucosal injury, but their effect on esophageal function is less appreciated. Our aim was to determine the effect of acid and/or bile on mucosal injury and esophageal function. From 1993-2004, 402 patients with reflux symptoms had 24-hour pH and Bilitec monitoring, manometry, and endoscopy with biopsies. Mucosal injury (esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus) and esophageal function (lower esophageal sphincter [LES] characteristics and body contractility) in patients with acid reflux, bile reflux, or both were compared with patients without reflux. Reflux was present in 273/402 patients; of these, 37 (13.5%) had increased exposure to bile, 82 (30.0%) had increased exposure to acid, and 154 (56.4%) had increased exposure to both. Mucosal injury was most common with increased mixed acid and bile exposure, followed by acid alone, and was uncommon with bile alone (P < 0.0001). Functional deterioration paralleled mucosal injury (P < 0.0001). Mixed acid and bile exposure was present in more than half of patients with reflux and was associated with the most severe mucosal injury and the greatest deterioration of esophageal function. This suggests that composition of gastric juice is the primary determinant of inflammatory mucosal injury and subsequent loss of esophageal function.

Introduction: Goblet cells in Barrett's esophagus (BE) vary in their density within the Barrett's segment. Exposure of Barrett's epithelium to bile acids is a major stimulant for goblet cell formation. The dissociation of bile acids into forms that penetrate Barrett's epithelium is known to be pH dependent. We hypothesized that variations in the esophageal luminal pH environment explains the variability in goblet cell density. The aim of this study was to correlate esophageal luminal pH with goblet cell density in patients with BE. Methods: A customized six-sensor pH catheter was positioned with the most distal sensor in the stomach and the remaining sensors located 1 cm below and 1, 3, 5, and 8 cm above the upper border of the lower esophageal sphincter in five normal subjects and six patients with long-segment BE. The luminal pH was measured by each sensor for 24-h and expressed as median pH. Patients with BE had four quadrant biopsies at levels corresponding to the location of the pH sensors. Goblet cell density was graded from 0 to 3 based on the number per high-power field. Results: In normal subjects, the median pH values recorded in the sensors within the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal body were all above 5. In patients with BE, the median pH recorded by the sensor within the LES was 2.8 and increased progressively to 4.7 in the sensor at 8 cm above the LES. Goblet cell density was significantly lower in the distal Barrett's segment exposed to a median pH of 2.2 and increased in the proximal Barrett's segment exposed to a median pH of 4.4 ( p = 0.003). Conclusion: Patients with BE have a goblet cell gradient that correlates directly with an esophageal luminal pH gradient. This suggests that goblet cell differentiation is pH dependent and likely due to the effect of pH on bile acid dissociation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: The histologic criterion of >20 eosinophils per high power field (hpf) is presently believed to establish the diagnosis of idiopathic eosinophilic esophagitis (IEE). This is based on data that the number of intraepithelial eosinophils in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is less than 20/hpf. This study tests this belief. METHODS: Pathology records were searched for patients who had an eosinophil count >20/hpf in an esophageal biopsy. This patient population was biased toward adults with GERD who had routine multilevel biopsies of the esophagus. The clinical, radiological, and manometric data and biopsies were studied. RESULTS: Forty patients out of a total of 3,648 reports examined had an eosinophil count >20/hpf in squamous epithelium of an esophageal biopsy. Analysis of these 40 cases indicated that 6 (15%) patients had IEE, 2 (5%) had coincident IEE and GERD, 28 (70%) had GERD, and 2 (5%) each had achalasia and diverticulum. There was no significant difference among these groups in terms of maximum eosinophil number, biopsy levels with >20 esoinophils/hpf, presence of eosinophilic microabscesses, involvement of surface layers by eosinophils, and severity of basal cell hyperplasia and dilated intercellular spaces. CONCLUSION: All histologic features presently ascribed to IEE can occur in other esophageal diseases, notably GERD. As such, the finding of intraepithelial eosinophilia in any number is not specific for IEE. When a patient with GERD has an esophageal biopsy with an eosinophil count >20/hpf, it does not mean that the patient has IEE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reliable quantification of gene expression offers the possibility of more accurate and prognostically relevant characterization of tissues than potentially subjective interpretations of histopathologists. We measured the expression of 18 selected genes and compared them to histological features in a spectrum of esophageal disease to evaluate the feasibility of molecular characterization of normal and pathologic esophageal epithelia. Esophageal tissue biopsies from 82 patients with foregut symptoms were laser capture microdissected, and the expression levels of 18 selected genes were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Linear discriminant analysis, which uses combinations of genes to distinguish between histological groups, was performed to compare gene expression and the following five histological groups: (1) normal squamous epithelium (n = 35), (2) reflux esophagitis (n = 13), (3) non-dysplastic Barrett's (n = 33), (4) dysplastic Barrett's (n = 16), (5) adenocarcinoma (n = 31). A panel of seven genes had 90-94% predictive power to distinguish non-dysplastic and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Clustering analysis revealed structure in gene expression values even in the absence of histology. Expression levels in 17 genes differed significantly across histological groups. Classification based on gene expression agreed with histopathological assessment in the following percentage of cases: normal squamous epithelium = 53%, reflux esophagitis = 31%, non-dysplastic Barrett's = 76%, dysplastic Barrett's = 40%, and adenocarcinoma = 59%. Interestingly, predictive power improved markedly when inflammatory and dysplastic tissues were removed (77-94%). Gene expression classification agrees well with histopathological examination. When differences occur, it is unclear whether this effect is due to intraobserver variability in pathological diagnosis or to a genuine difference between gene expression and histopathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]