Search

Achalasia is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting esophageal sphincter function. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical approaches, such as Heller myotomy (HM). Combining Dor fundoplication with HM is controversial but may prevent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether HM with Dor fundoplication reduces GERD rates and increases dysphagia rates. Eighty patients who underwent HM between January 2018 and August 2023 were included. Sixty-four patients had Dor fundoplication and were matched 4:1 to 16 patients without fundoplication. Records were reviewed for GERD and achalasia symptoms at various postoperative time points. No significant differences in GERD or dysphagia symptoms were found between the two groups at any time point. Similarly, there were no significant differences in chest pain or dysphagia treatment. In conclusion, this study suggests that the addition of Dor fundoplication to HM does not significantly impact postoperative GERD or achalasia-related symptoms., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests.

The purpose of this paper is to describe a robotic surgical technique for converting a slipped Nissen fundoplication to a Toupet fundoplication. Our technique utilizes four 8 mm robotic ports placed in a horizontal pattern above the umbilicus. The robotic tools we used are a vessel sealer, bipolar forceps, and Cadière forceps. In addition, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is placed through the esophagus into the stomach to be used as a bougie. If a hernia is present, we dissect it from the mediastinum until the posterior confluence is identified. Next sutures from the previous Nissen fundoplication are identified and removed to mobilize the crus. All adhesions around the stomach are removed to mobilize the esophagus, ensuing 3 cm of intraabdominal esophagus is available. Using an EGD as a bougie, we used two interrupted, 0 silk suture over Teflon pledgets placed in a horizontal mattress fashion to close the hiatal defect. Using an endoscope, we identified the previous Nissen fundoplication and used a 60 mm blue load stapler to transect the wrap from the stomach. The 360° Nissen fundoplication had now been converted into a 270° Toupet fundoplication, which is confirmed with the EGD. The functionality of the wrap is confirmed if the "Stack of Coins" sign is present, and the wrap lies tight against the scope. A Nissen-to-Toupet fundoplication conversion using a robotic-assisted surgical technique may be useful in reducing reoperations and complications in patients undergoing fundoplication surgery., (© 2023. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)

The optimal distance between the starting point of gastric transection and the pylorus during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), which can be referred to as the distance from pylorus (DFP), is controversial. No consensus exist for what DFP is considered antral preservation, and what DFP is considered antral resection. Some surgeons prefer shorter DFP to maximize excess weight loss percentage (EWL%), while others prefer longer DFP because they believe that it shortens length of stay (LOS) and protects against leaks, prolonged vomiting, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We sought to compare 6-cm DFP and 2-cm DFP in postoperative outcomes. In addition, we sought to evaluate the magnitude of any observed benefit through number needed to treat (NNT) analysis., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy can lead to dangerous complications as leaks and hemorrhage. In addition, it can lead to gastric twist/torsion, prolonged postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to study the efficacy of omentopexy/gastropexy (OP/GP) in the prevention of these postoperative complications., Materials and Methods: PubMed and Google Scholar were queried in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data was analyzed using the Review Manager (RevMen) 5.4.1 software. Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and random effects analysis model were used in all meta-analyses. The odds ratio was used for dichotomous data. Subgroup analysis was done according to bougie size. Subgroup analysis according to the distance between the starting point of gastric transection and pylorus was not possible (limitation). Odds ratio and control event rate across studies were used to calculate the number needed to treat (NNT) with OP/GP for an additional beneficial outcome (prevention of adverse outcome) to occur., Results: The initial search identified 442 records; 371 were found irrelevant after screening and were excluded. The remaining 71 reports were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. An additional 57 reports were excluded following an in-depth assessment. The remaining 14 studies were included in this meta-analysis; 8 were nonrandomized studies (NRSs) while 6 were randomized controlled trials. Most studies originated from a single country (limitation). A statistically significant decrease in favor of OP/GP was observed for all outcomes (bleeding, leaks, gastric twist/torsion, prolonged PONV 1 month postoperatively, and postoperative de novo GERD). Data was consistent across studies (low I2 ), and subgroup analysis according to bougie size revealed no subgroup differences. However, this study had 3 limitations that does not allow for strong conclusions., Conclusions: Although the current literature lacks strong scientific evidence, this study suggests that omentopexy/gastropexy (OP/GP) may offer protection against bleeding and leaks as a staple line reinforcement method, as well as against gastric twist/torsion, prolonged postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as a staple line fixation method. Therefore, it is worthwhile to proceed with large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trials to reevaluate our findings. Furthermore, conducting a comparison between OP/GP and other staple line reinforcement techniques would be beneficial., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Obesity is a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia (HH). Fundoplication is the standard operation for GERD with HH. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the procedure of choice for obese patients with either GERD or a large HH, but neither are indications for RYGB. To delineate bypass surgery as a treatment option for obese patients with HH and GERD, we propose new terminology, antireflux gastric bypass (ARGB). ARGB differs from RYGB by utilizing varying efferent limb lengths for GERD treatment. We hypothesized that ARGB would have higher GERD resolution, lower HH recurrence, and improves weight loss when compared with fundoplication. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed, evaluating patients undergoing repair of large HH (>5 cm) with obesity from January 2013 to February 2021. The primary outcome was GERD resolution, secondary outcomes include HH recurrence and weight loss. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI), and hernia size by nonlinear mixed modeling. Results: Forty patients underwent fundoplication, and 16 patients underwent ARGB. Fundoplication patients had a larger mean hernia size (8.7 × 6.3 cm versus 6.6 × 6.4 cm), whereas ARGB patients had a higher BMI (39.2 versus 34.2 kg/m 2 ). Recurrence showed nonstatistically significant lower incidence with ARGB and no significant difference in GERD resolution. Weight ( P  < .0001) and excess body weight ( P  < .0001) loss were superior with ARGB. Conclusions: Obese patients with large HHs and GERD treated with ARGB had similar GERD resolution, lower HH recurrence, and improved weight loss when compared with fundoplication. ARGB is an acceptable treatment option for obese patients with a massive paraesophageal hernia in the setting of GERD.

Purpose: Management of complicated reflux in infants and children is controversial. Jejunal feedings are used when reflux complications occur with gastric feeds. We sought to determine how successful fundoplication is to allow for return of physiologic gastric feeds in patients requiring jejunal feeds preoperatively., Methods: A retrospective review of patients requiring jejunal feeds before fundoplication between 2010 and 2015 was conducted., Results: Two hundred thirteen children underwent fundoplication during the study period. One hundred fourteen (49%) children required preoperative jejunal feeds. Median preoperative jejunal feeding trial was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR] 8-36). After fundoplication, gastric feeds were attempted in all patients. Ninety-one (80%) patients tolerated feeds postoperatively without return of preoperative symptoms. Twenty-one (18%) children developed gastric feeding intolerance and were treated with jejunal feeds at a mean of 8 months postoperatively (range 3-17). Ten (9%) children eventually tolerated intragastric bolus feeds, requiring jejunal feeds for a median duration of 2.3 months (IQR 1-5). There were no differences seen in those who were able to tolerate gastric early after the operation and those who did not. Of the patients who were unable to tolerate bolus gastric feeds during the study, a higher proportion had neurologic impairment and were on jejunal feeds for a longer period of time before fundoplication., Conclusion: In the majority of patients requiring continuous jejunal feeds to manage complications of reflux, fundoplication allows for transition to gastric bolus feeding.