Search

5-Hydroxytryptamine(4) (5-HT(4)) receptors are an interesting target for the management of patients in need of gastrointestinal (GI) promotility treatment. They have proven therapeutic potential to treat patients with GI motility disorders. Lack of selectivity for the 5-HT(4) receptor has limited the clinical success of the agonists used until now. For instance, next to their affinity for 5-HT(4) receptors, both cisapride and tegaserod have appreciable affinity for other receptors, channels or transporters [e.g. cisapride: human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) is K(+) channel and tegaserod: 5-HT(1) and 5-HT(2) receptors]. Adverse cardiovascular events observed with these compounds are not 5-HT(4) receptor-related. Recent efforts have led to the discovery of a series of selective 5-HT(4) receptor ligands, with prucalopride being the most advanced in clinical development. The selectivity of these new compounds clearly differentiates them from the older generation compounds by minimizing the potential of target-unrelated side effects. The availability of selective agonists enables the focus to shift to the exploration of 5-HT(4) receptor-related differences between agonists. Based on drug- and tissue-related properties (e.g. differences in receptor binding, receptor density, effectors, coupling efficiency), 5-HT(4) receptor agonists are able to express tissue selectivity, i.e. behave as a partial agonist in some and as a full agonist in other tissues. Furthermore, the concept of ligand-directed signalling offers great opportunities for future drug development by enlarging the scientific basis for the generation of agonist-specific effects in different cell types, tissues or organs. Selective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists might thus prove to be innovative drugs with an attractive safety profile for better treatment of patients suffering from hypomotility disorders.

5-Hydroxytryptamine4 (5-HT4) receptors are an interesting target for the management of patients in need of gastrointestinal (GI) promotility treatment. They have proven therapeutic potential to treat patients with GI motility disorders. Lack of selectivity for the 5-HT4 receptor has limited the clinical success of the agonists used until now. For instance, next to their affinity for 5-HT4 receptors, both cisapride and tegaserod have appreciable affinity for other receptors, channels or transporters [e.g. cisapride: human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) is K+ channel and tegaserod: 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptors]. Adverse cardiovascular events observed with these compounds are not 5-HT4 receptor-related. Recent efforts have led to the discovery of a series of selective 5-HT4 receptor ligands, with prucalopride being the most advanced in clinical development. The selectivity of these new compounds clearly differentiates them from the older generation compounds by minimizing the potential of target-unrelated side effects. The availability of selective agonists enables the focus to shift to the exploration of 5-HT4 receptor-related differences between agonists. Based on drug- and tissue-related properties (e.g. differences in receptor binding, receptor density, effectors, coupling efficiency), 5-HT4 receptor agonists are able to express tissue selectivity, i.e. behave as a partial agonist in some and as a full agonist in other tissues. Furthermore, the concept of ligand-directed signalling offers great opportunities for future drug development by enlarging the scientific basis for the generation of agonist-specific effects in different cell types, tissues or organs. Selective 5-HT4 receptor agonists might thus prove to be innovative drugs with an attractive safety profile for better treatment of patients suffering from hypomotility disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In seven isolated segments of the feline duodenum, the timings of all spikes and the locations of all spike patches that occurred after 12–16 successive slow waves were analysed. Simultaneous recordings were performed during 1-min periods using 240 extracellular electrodes (24 × 10 array; interelectrode distance 2 mm) positioned onto the serosal surface. In all seven preparations, spikes always occurred during the first half of the slow wave cycle. From preparation to preparation, and within 1-min periods in each preparation, there was limited variation in the spike–spike intervals, in the times between the spikes and the preceding slow wave and in the number of spikes at each electrode site. In contrast, the number of electrode sites that recorded spikes and the number of spike patches both showed great variability between preparations and sometimes within a single preparation. In addition, the location of spikes and spike patches was not random but was significantly concentrated in certain areas, often located along the anti-mesenteric border, while other sites showed little or no spike activity. In conclusion, spikes and spike patches tend to occur significantly in some areas and not in others. This spatial heterogeneity will play a role in intestinal motility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]