Search

Abstract: The plant parasitic nematode, Heterodera glycines is the major pathogen of Glycine max (soybean). H. glycines accomplish parasitism by creating a nurse cell known as the syncytium from which it feeds. The syncytium undergoes two developmental phases. The first is a parasitism phase where feeding sites are selected, initiating the development of the syncytium. During this earlier phase (1–4 days post infection), syncytia undergoing resistant and susceptible reactions appear the same. The second phase is when the resistance response becomes evident (between 4 and 6dpi) and is completed by 9dpi. Analysis of the resistant reaction of G. max genotype PI 88788 (G. max [PI 88788]) to H. glycines population NL1-RHg/HG-type 7 (H. glycines [NL1-RHg/HG-type 7]) is accomplished by laser microdissection of syncytia at 3, 6 and 9dpi. Comparative analyses are made to pericycle and their neighboring cells isolated from mock-inoculated roots. These analyses reveal induced levels of the jasmonic acid biosynthesis and 13-lipoxygenase pathways. Direct comparative analyses were also made of syncytia at 6 days post infection to those at 3dpi (base line). The comparative analyses were done to identify localized gene expression that characterizes the resistance phase of the resistant reaction. The most highly induced pathways include components of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, 13-lipoxygenase pathway, S-adenosyl methionine pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, suberin biosynthesis, adenosylmethionine biosynthesis, ethylene biosynthesis from methionine, flavonoid biosynthesis and the methionine salvage pathway. In comparative analyses of 9dpi to 6dpi (base line), these pathways, along with coumarin biosynthesis, cellulose biosynthesis and homogalacturonan degradation are induced. The experiments presented here strongly implicate the jasmonic acid defense pathway as a factor involved in the localized resistant reaction of G. max [PI 88788] to H. glycines [NL1-RHg/HG-type 7]. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background. A comparative microarray investigation was done using detection call methodology (DCM) and differential expression analyses. The goal was to identify genes found in specific cell populations that were eliminated by differential expression analysis due to the nature of differential expression methods. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used to isolate nearly homogeneous populations of plant root cells. Results. The analyses identified the presence of 13,291 transcripts between the 4 different sample types. The transcripts filtered down into a total of 6,267 that were detected as being present in one or more sample types. A comparative analysis of DCM and differential expression methods showed a group of genes that were not differentially expressed, but were expressed at detectable amounts within specific cell types. Conclusion. The DCM has identified patterns of gene expression not shown by differential expression analyses. DCM has identified genes that are possibly cell-type specific and/or involved in important aspects of plant nematode interactions during the resistance response, revealing the uniqueness of a particular cell population at a particular point during its differentiation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study that discusses research on gene expression when soybean interacts with soybean cyst nematode (SCN). It mentions that SCN is the major pest that affect soybean. It discusses the application of this information to identify genes involved in soybean and SCN involved in resistance and susceptibility. It concludes that soybean and SCN interactions were revealed using genome sequencing and development of microarrays with soybean and SCN genes.

Background: A single Glycine max (soybean) genotype (Peking) reacts differently to two different populations of Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode) within the first twelve hours of infection during resistant (R) and susceptible (S) reactions. This suggested that H. glycines has population-specific gene expression signatures. A microarray analysis of 7539 probe sets representing 7431 transcripts on the Affymetrix® soybean GeneChip® were used to identify population-specific gene expression signatures in pre-infective second stage larva (pi-L2) prior to their infection of Peking. Other analyses focused on the infective L2 at 12hours post infection (i-L212h), and the infective sedentary stages at 3days post infection (i-L23d) and 8days post infection (i-L2/L38d). Results: Differential expression and false discovery rate (FDR) analyses comparing populations of pi-L2 (i.e., incompatible population, NL1-RHg to compatible population, TN8) identified 71 genes that were induced in NL1-RHg as compared to TN8. These genes included putative gland protein G23G12, putative esophageal gland protein Hgg-20 and arginine kinase. The comparative analysis of pi-L2 identified 44 genes that were suppressed in NL1-RHg as compared to TN8. These genes included a different Hgg-20 gene, an EXPB1 protein and a cuticular collagen. By 12 h, there were 7 induced genes and 0 suppressed genes in NL1-RHg. By 3d, there were 9 induced and 10 suppressed genes in NL1-RHg. Substantial changes in gene expression became evident subsequently. At 8d there were 13 induced genes in NL1-RHg. This included putative gland protein G20E03, ubiquitin extension protein, putative gland protein G30C02 and β-1,4 endoglucanase. However, 1668 genes were found to be suppressed in NL1-RHg. These genes included steroid alpha reductase, serine proteinase and a collagen protein. Conclusion: These analyses identify a genetic expression signature for these two populations both prior to and subsequently as they undergo an R or S reaction. The identification of genes like steroid alpha reductase and serine proteinase that are involved in feeding and nutritional uptake as being highly suppressed during the R response at 8d may indicate genes that the plant is targeting. The analyses also identified numerous putative parasitism genes that are differentially expressed. The 1668 genes that are suppressed in NL1-RHg, and hence induced in TN8 may represent genes that are important during the parasitic stages of H. glycines development. The potential for different arrays of putative parasitism genes to be expressed in different nematode populations may indicate how H. glycines evolve mechanisms to overcome resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Expression of the central circadian oscillator components CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1), TIMING OF CAB1 (TOC1), GIGANTEA (GI), and CONSTANS (CO) occurs in Glycine max root cells (syncytia) parasitized by the nematode Heterodera glycines while undergoing resistance, indicating a defense role. GmCCA1-1 relative transcript abundance (RTA) in roots experiencing overexpression (OE) or RNA interference (RNAi) is characterized by rhythmic oscillations, compared to a ribosomal protein gene (GmRPS21) control. A GmCCA1-1 RTA change, advancing by 12 h, exists in H. glycines -infected as compared to uninfected controls in wild-type, H. glycines -resistant, G. max [Peking/PI 548402]. The G. max [Peking/PI 548402] transgenic controls exhibit the RTA change by 4 h post infection (hpi), not consistently occurring in the H. glycines -susceptible G. max [Williams 82/PI 518671] until 56 hpi. GmCCA1-1 expression is observed to be reduced in H. glycines -infected GmCCA1-1 -OE roots as compared to non-infected transgenic roots with no significant change observed among RNAi roots. The GmCCA1-1 expression in transgenic GmCCA1-1 -OE roots remains higher than control and RNAi roots. Decreased GmCCA1-1 mRNA among infected roots shows the altered expression is targeted by H. glycines. Gene expression of proven defense genes including 9 different mitogen activated protein kinases (GmMAPK s), NON-RACE SPECIFIC DISEASE RESISTANCE 1 (GmNDR1-1), RPM1-INTERACTING PROTEIN 4 (GmRIN4-4), and the secreted xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase 43 (GmXTH43) in GmCCA1- 1-OE and GmCCA1-1 -RNAi roots, compared to controls, reveal a significant role of GmCCA1-1 expression in roots undergoing defense to H. glycines parasitism. The observation that GmCCA1-1 regulates GmXTH43 expression links the central circadian oscillator to the functionality of the secretion system. • Central circadian oscillator genes are expressed in nematode-parasitized root cells undergoing defense. • The overexpression of the central circadian oscillator genes suppresses parasitism. • The central circadian oscillator gene CCA1-1 regulates the expression of proven defense genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) play important signal transduction roles. However, little is known regarding how they influence the gene expression of other family members and the relationship to a biological process, including the Glycine max defense response to Heterodera glycines. Transcriptomics have identified MAPK gene expression occurring within root cells undergoing a defense response to a pathogenic event initiated by H. glycines in the allotetraploid Glycine max. Functional analyses are presented for its 32 MAPKs revealing 9 have a defense role, including homologs of Arabidopsis thaliana MAPK (MPK) MPK2, MPK3, MPK4, MPK5, MPK6, MPK13, MPK16 and MPK20. Defense signaling occurring through pathogen activated molecular pattern (PAMP) triggered immunity (PTI) and effector triggered immunity (ETI) have been determined in relation to these MAPKs. Five different types of gene expression relate to MAPK expression, influencing PTI and ETI gene expression and proven defense genes including an ABC-G transporter, 20S membrane fusion particle components, glycoside biosynthesis, carbon metabolism, hemicellulose modification, transcription and secretion. The experiments show MAPKs broadly influence defense MAPK gene expression, including the co-regulation of parologous MAPKs and reveal its relationship to proven defense genes. The experiments reveal each defense MAPK induces the expression of a G. max homolog of a PATHOGENESIS RELATED1 (PR1), itself shown to function in defense in the studied pathosystem. Highlights • The entire MAPK gene family has been examined functionally. • The results have identified the MAPK gene family functions as a cohort during the defense response. • The results reveal levels of co-regulated gene expression that underlie the defense response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]