Search

Objective: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission may have subclinical synovial inflammation. This study was undertaken to determine the proportion of patients with RA in remission or with low disease activity at the time of arthroplasty who had histologic or transcriptional evidence of synovitis, and to identify clinical features that distinguished patients as having subclinical synovitis. Methods: We compared Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) to synovial histologic features in 135 patients with RA undergoing arthroplasty. We also compared DAS28 scores to RNA‐Seq data in a subset of 35 patients. Results: Fourteen percent of patients met DAS28 criteria for clinical remission (DAS28 <2.6), and another 15% met criteria for low disease activity (DAS28 <3.2). Histologic analysis of synovium revealed synovitis in 27% and 31% of samples from patients in remission and patients with low disease activity, respectively. Patients with low disease activity and synovitis also exhibited increased C‐reactive protein (CRP) (P = 0.0006) and increased anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti‐CCP) antibody levels (P = 0.03) compared to patients without synovitis. Compared to patients with a "low inflammatory synovium" subtype, 183 genes were differentially expressed in the synovium of patients with subclinical synovitis. The majority of these genes (86%) were also differentially expressed in the synovium of patients with clinically active disease (DAS28 ≥3.2). Conclusion: Thirty‐one percent of patients with low clinical disease activity exhibited histologic evidence of subclinical synovitis, which was associated with increased CRP and anti‐CCP levels. Our findings suggest that synovial gene expression signatures of clinical synovitis are present in patients with subclinical synovitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this study, we sought to refine histologic scoring of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial tissue by training with gene expression data and machine learning. Methods: Twenty histologic features were assessed in 129 synovial tissue samples (n = 123 RA patients and n = 6 osteoarthritis [OA] patients). Consensus clustering was performed on gene expression data from a subset of 45 synovial samples. Support vector machine learning was used to predict gene expression subtypes, using histologic data as the input. Corresponding clinical data were compared across subtypes. Results: Consensus clustering of gene expression data revealed 3 distinct synovial subtypes, including a high inflammatory subtype characterized by extensive infiltration of leukocytes, a low inflammatory subtype characterized by enrichment in pathways including transforming growth factor β, glycoproteins, and neuronal genes, and a mixed subtype. Machine learning applied to histologic features, with gene expression subtypes serving as labels, generated an algorithm for the scoring of histologic features. Patients with the high inflammatory synovial subtype exhibited higher levels of markers of systemic inflammation and autoantibodies. C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly correlated with the severity of pain in the high inflammatory subgroup but not in the others. Conclusion: Gene expression analysis of RA and OA synovial tissue revealed 3 distinct synovial subtypes. These labels were used to generate a histologic scoring algorithm in which the histologic scores were found to be associated with parameters of systemic inflammation, including the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP level, and autoantibody levels. Comparison of gene expression patterns to clinical features revealed a potentially clinically important distinction: mechanisms of pain may differ in patients with different synovial subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with belimumab in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) treated with background mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Methods: In this 52‐week, investigator‐initiated, single‐center, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, pilot study, 20 patients with dcSSc recently started on MMF were randomized 1:1 to additionally receive belimumab at 10 mg/kg intravenously or placebo. We assessed safety, efficacy, and differential gene expression. Results: In the belimumab group, the median modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) decreased from 27 (interquartile range [IQR] 26.5, 31) to 18 (IQR 11, 23) (P = 0.039). In the placebo group, the median MRSS decreased from 28 (IQR 22, 28) to 21 (IQR 14, 25) (P = 0.023). The median change in MRSS was –10 (IQR –13, –9) in the belimumab group and –3.0 (IQR –15, –1) in the placebo group (P = 0.411). There were no significant differences between the groups in the number of adverse events (AEs). A significant decrease in expression of B cell signaling and profibrotic genes and pathways was observed in patients with improved MRSS in the belimumab group but not in the placebo group. Conclusion: Patients in both treatment groups experienced significant improvements in MRSS. The median difference was greater in the belimumab group but did not achieve statistical significance in this small pilot study. AEs were similar between the groups. Changes in gene expression were consistent with mechanism of action and showed that clinical response to treatment with belimumab is associated with a significant decrease in profibrotic genes and pathways. Additional studies are needed to determine the role of belimumab in the treatment of dcSSc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background aims. Immunotherapy targeting MAGE-A3 in multiple myeloma (MM) could eradicate highly aggressive and proliferative clonal cell populations responsible for relapse. However, expression of many cancer-testis antigens, including MAGE-A3, can be heterogeneous, leading to the potential for tumor escape despite MAGE-A3-induced immunity. We hypothesized that a combination of the hypomethylating agent 5-azacitidine (5AC) and the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) MGCD0103 (MGC) could induce MAGE-A3 expression in MAGE-A3-negative MM, resulting in recognition and killing of MM cells by MAGE-A3-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). Methods. Gene expression analyses of MAGE-A3 expression in primary MM patient samples at diagnosis and relapse were completed to identify populations that would benefit from MAGE-A3 immunotherapy. MM cell lines were treated with 5AC and MGC. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western blotting were performed to assess MAGE-A3 RNA and protein levels, respectively. Chromium-release assays and interferon (IFN) secretion assays were employed to ascertain MAGE-A3 CTL specificity against treated targets. Results. Gene expression analysis revealed that MAGE-A3 is expressed in MM patients at diagnosis (25%) and at relapse (49%). We observed de novo expression of MAGE-A3 RNA and protein in MAGE-A3-negative cell lines treated with 5AC. MGC treatment alone did not induce expression but sequential 5AC/MGC treatment led to enhanced expression and augmented recognition by MAGE-A3-specific CTL, as assessed by 51Cr-release assays ( P == 0.047) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for IFN-γγ secretion ( P == 0.004). Conclusions. MAGE-A3 is an attractive target for immunotherapy of MM and epigenetic modulation by 5AC, and MGC can induce MAGE-A3 expression and facilitate killing by MAGE-A3-specific CTL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Myeloma survival varies markedly with International Staging System classification, presence of cytogenetic abnormalities, and, especially, gene expression profiling-based risk and delTP53 status, whose collective impact has not been examined in the context of specific therapies. METHODS: The authors examined overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and complete response duration (CRD) in Total Therapy 2 with randomization to a control or thalidomide arm and in Total Therapy 3 with added bortezomib. Among 612 patients with complete data sets, multivariate analyses were used to investigate the relative contributions to OS, EFS, and CRD of International Staging System stage, cytogenetic abnormalities, and gene expression profiling-derived risk and delTP53 status, in the context of the 3 Total Therapy regimens. RESULTS: Whereas gene expression profiling risk segregated outcomes within all 3 International Staging System stages, International Staging System 3 conferred inferior prognosis only in low-risk myeloma, whereas the grave prognosis of high-risk disease was International Staging System-independent. After adjusting for gene expression profiling-defined high risk and delTP53 in multivariate analysis, International Staging System 3 and cytogenetic abnormalities both retained independent adverse implications for OS, EFS, and CRD. Among the 86% with low-risk disease, cytogenetic abnormalities and delTP53 both affected all 3 endpoints negatively, whereas the International Staging System 3 effect was limited to OS. Total Therapy 3 improved survival outcomes beyond results obtained with Total Therapy 2. CONCLUSIONS: In the genomic era, standard laboratory variables, such as International Staging System stage and presence of cytogenetic abnormalities, continue to impact survival after adjusting for gene expression profiling risk and delTP53 status, providing a basis for stratification in our current practice of gene expression profiling risk-based treatment assignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]