Search

Background: To construct gene co-expression networks, it is necessary to evaluate the correlation between different gene expression profiles. However, commonly used correlation metrics, including both linear (such as Pearson's correlation) and monotonic (such as Spearman's correlation) dependence metrics, are not enough to observe the nature of real biological systems. Hence, introducing a more informative correlation metric when constructing gene co-expression networks is still an interesting topic., Results: In this paper, we test distance correlation, a correlation metric integrating both linear and non-linear dependence, with other three typical metrics (Pearson's correlation, Spearman's correlation, and maximal information coefficient) on four different arrays (macrophage and liver) and RNA-seq (cervical cancer and pancreatic cancer) datasets. Among all the metrics, distance correlation is distribution free and can provide better performance on complex relationships and anti-outlier. Furthermore, distance correlation is applied to Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) for constructing a gene co-expression network analysis method which we named Distance Correlation-based Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (DC-WGCNA). Compared with traditional WGCNA, DC-WGCNA can enhance the result of enrichment analysis and improve the module stability., Conclusions: Distance correlation is better at revealing complex biological relationships between gene profiles compared with other correlation metrics, which contribute to more meaningful modules when analyzing gene co-expression networks. However, due to the high time complexity of distance correlation, the implementation requires more computer memory., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Gene co-expression networks are widely studied in the biomedical field, with algorithms such as WGCNA and lmQCM having been developed to detect co-expressed modules. However, these algorithms have limitations such as insufficient granularity and unbalanced module size, which prevent full acquisition of knowledge from data mining. In addition, it is difficult to incorporate prior knowledge in current co-expression module detection algorithms., Results: In this paper, we propose a novel module detection algorithm based on topology potential and spectral clustering algorithm to detect co-expressed modules in gene co-expression networks. By testing on TCGA data, our novel method can provide more complete coverage of genes, more balanced module size and finer granularity than current methods in detecting modules with significant overall survival difference. In addition, the proposed algorithm can identify modules by incorporating prior knowledge., Conclusion: In summary, we developed a method to obtain as much as possible information from networks with increased input coverage and the ability to detect more size-balanced and granular modules. In addition, our method can integrate data from different sources. Our proposed method performs better than current methods with complete coverage of input genes and finer granularity. Moreover, this method is designed not only for gene co-expression networks but can also be applied to any general fully connected weighted network., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a complex disease and is comprised of several histological subtypes, the most frequent of which are clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC). While lots of studies have been performed to investigate the molecular characterizations of different subtypes of RCC, our knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms are still incomplete. As molecular alterations are eventually reflected on the pathway level to execute certain biological functions, characterizing the pathway perturbations is crucial for understanding tumorigenesis and development of RCC., Methods: In this study, we investigated the pathway perturbations of various RCC subtype against normal tissue based on differential expressed genes within a certain pathway. We explored the potential upstream regulators of subtype-specific pathways with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). We also evaluated the relationships between subtype-specific pathways and clinical outcome with survival analysis., Results: In this study, we carried out a pathway-based analysis to explore the mechanisms of various RCC subtypes with TCGA RNA-seq data. Both commonly altered pathways and subtype-specific pathways were detected. To identify the distinctive characteristics of each subtype, we focused on subtype-specific perturbed pathways. Specifically, we observed that some of the altered pathways were regulated by several recurrent upstream regulators which presenting different expression patterns among distinct RCC subtypes. We also noticed that a large number of perturbed pathways were controlled by the subtype-specific upstream regulators. Moreover, we also evaluated the relationships between perturbed pathways and clinical outcome. Prognostic pathways were identified and their roles in tumor development and progression were inferred., Conclusions: In summary, we evaluated the relationships among pathway perturbations, upstream regulators and clinical outcome for differential subtypes in RCC. We hypothesized that the alterations of common upstream regulators as well as subtype-specific upstream regulators work together to affect the downstream pathway perturbations and drive cancer initialization and prognosis. Our findings not only increase our understanding of the mechanisms of various RCC subtypes, but also provide targets for personalized therapeutic intervention.

Background: Neuroblastoma is one of the most common types of pediatric cancer. In current neuroblastoma prognosis, patients can be stratified into high- and low-risk groups. Generally, more than 90% of the patients in the low-risk group will survive, while less than 50% for those with the high-risk disease will survive. Since the so-called "high-risk" patients still contain patients with mixed good and poor outcomes, more refined stratification needs to be established so that for the patients with poor outcome, they can receive prompt and individualized treatment to improve their long-term survival rate, while the patients with good outcome can avoid unnecessary over treatment., Methods: We first mined co-expressed gene modules from microarray and RNA-seq data of neuroblastoma samples using the weighted network mining algorithm lmQCM, and summarize the resulted modules into eigengenes. Then patient similarity weight matrix was constructed with module eigengenes using two different approaches. At the last step, a consensus clustering method called Molecular Regularized Consensus Patient Stratification (MRCPS) was applied to aggregate both clinical information (clinical stage and clinical risk level) and multiple eigengene data for refined patient stratification., Results: The integrative method MRCPS demonstrated superior performance to clinical staging or transcriptomic features alone for the NB cohort stratification. It successfully identified the worst prognosis group from the clinical high-risk group, with less than 40% survived in the first 50 months of diagnosis. It also identified highly differentially expressed genes between best prognosis group and worst prognosis group, which can be potential gene biomarkers for clinical testing., Conclusions: To address the need for better prognosis and facilitate personalized treatment on neuroblastoma, we modified the recently developed bioinformatics workflow MRCPS for refined patient prognosis. It integrates clinical information and molecular features such as gene co-expression for prognosis. This clustering workflow is flexible, allowing the integration of both categorical and numerical data. The results demonstrate the power of survival prognosis with this integrative analysis workflow, with superior prognostic performance to only using transcriptomic data or clinical staging/risk information alone., Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Lan Hu, Haibo Liu, Julie Zhu and Aleksandra Gruca.