Search

PurposeTo report on cases of unilateral perimacular atrophy after treatment with voretigene neparvovec-rzyl, in the setting of previous contralateral eye treatment with a different viral vector.DesignSingle-center, retrospective chart review.MethodsIn this case series, four patients between the ages of six and 11 years old with RPE65-related retinopathy were treated unilaterally with rAAV2-CB-hRPE65 as part of a gene augmentation clinical trial (NCT00749957). Six to 10 years later the contralateral eyes were treated with the Food and Drug Administration-approved drug, voretigene neparvovec-rzyl. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fundus photos, ocular coherence tomography, two-color dark-adapted perimetry, full field stimulus threshold testing (FST), and location of subretinal bleb and chorioretinal atrophy were evaluated.ResultsThree out of four patients showed unilateral perimacular atrophy after treatment with voretigene, ranging from five to 22 months after treatment. Areas of robust visual field improvement were followed by areas of chorioretinal atrophy. Despite perimacular changes, BCVA, FST, and subjective improvements in vision and nyctalopia were maintained. Perimacular atrophy was not observed in the first eye treated with the previous viral vector.ConclusionsWe observed areas of robust visual field improvement followed by perimacular atrophy in voretigene treated eyes, as compared to the initially treated contralateral eyes.Translational relevanceCaution is advised when using two different viral vectors between eyes in gene therapy. This may become an important issue in the future with increasing gene therapy clinical trials for inherited retinal dystrophies.

Purpose: Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is a sight-threatening inherited retinal disorder (IRD) caused by numerous genetic mutations. Multi-characteristic opsin (MCO)-based optogenetic therapy allows the recruitment of residual cells of the retina in LCA for alternative vision transduction while being mutation-agnostic. Using rd12 mice, we investigated the in vivo efficacy of an adeno-associated virus2 (AAV2)-transduced ambient light-activatable MCO (MCO-010) containing a metabotropic glutamate receptor-6 bipolar cell-specific promoter/enhancer. Methods: Mice requiring > 40 s to reach and board a dimly lit hidden platform in a water-maze were selected and randomly divided into 2 cohorts. These mice were intravitreally (IVT) injected with either 1.7E9 gene copies/eye of MCO-010 or control AAV2 and re-tested in the water-maze. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), hematoxylin and eosin staining of retinas, and electroretinographic (ERG) studies were also conducted. Results: Safety of MCO-010 in rd12 mice was confirmed by the lack of significant detrimental changes in the mouse behavior, b-wave amplitudes and in retinal thickness. rd12 control mice performed relatively poorly in the water-maze test requiring ≥ 30–60 s to find and board the platform. MCO-010-treated rd12 mice reached the platform much faster than the AAV2-treated rd12 mice, with some mice only requiring < 5 s to achieve this goal (P < 0.01–0.0024). Conclusions: IVT MCO-010 treatment was well tolerated by rd12 mice, and it prevented the decrease in retinal thickness, and preserved ERG parameters. It also significantly improved the vision in rd12 mice relative to control AAV2-injected mice. MCO-010 therefore represents a novel and efficacious optogenetic therapeutic to treat LCA and other IRDs irrespective of the genetic defect(s). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically diverse group of progressive degenerative disorders that can result in severe visual impairment or complete blindness. Despite their predominantly monogenic inheritance patterns, the genetic complexity of over 300 identified disease-causing genes presents a significant challenge in correlating clinical phenotypes with genotypes. Achieving a molecular diagnosis is crucial for providing patients with definitive diagnostic clarity and facilitating access to emerging gene-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have markedly enhanced our ability to identify genes and genetic defects leading to IRDs, thereby propelling the development of gene-based therapies. The clinical success of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna), the first approved retinal gene therapy for RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), has spurred considerable research and development in gene-based therapies, highlighting the importance of reviewing the current status of gene therapy for IRDs, particularly those utilizing adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based therapies. As novel disease-causing mutations continue to be discovered and more targeted gene therapies are developed, integrating these treatment opportunities into the standard care for IRD patients becomes increasingly critical. This review provides an update on the diverse phenotypic–genotypic landscape of IRDs, with a specific focus on recent advances in the understanding of IRDs in children with infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS). We highlight the complexities of the genotypic–phenotypic landscape of INS-associated IRDs, including conditions such as achromatopsia, LCA, congenital stationary night blindness, and subtypes of retinitis pigmentosa. Additionally, we provide an updated overview of AAV-based gene therapies for these diseases and discuss the potential of gene-based therapies for underlying IRDs that lead to INS, offering a valuable resource for pediatric patients potentially eligible for ongoing clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) encompass a wide spectrum of rare conditions characterized by diverse phenotypes associated with hundreds of genetic variations, often leading to progressive visual impairment and profound vision loss. Multiple natural history studies and clinical trials exploring gene therapy for various IRDs are ongoing. Outcomes for ophthalmic trials measure visual changes in three main categories—structural, functional, and patient-focused outcomes. Since IRDs may range from congenital with poor central vision from birth to affecting the peripheral retina initially and progressing insidiously with visual acuity affected late in the disease course, typical outcome measures such as central visual acuity and ocular coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of the macula may not provide adequate representation of therapeutic outcomes including alterations in disease course. Thus, alternative unique outcome measures are necessary to assess loss of peripheral vision, color vision, night vision, and contrast sensitivity in IRDs. These differences have complicated the assessment of clinical outcomes for IRD therapies, and the clinical trials for IRDs have had to design novel specialized endpoints to demonstrate treatment efficacy. As genetic engineering and gene therapy techniques continue to advance with growing investment from industry and accelerated approval tracks for orphan conditions, the clinical trials must continue to improve their assessments to demonstrate safety and efficacy of new gene therapies that aim to come to market. Here, we will provide an overview of the current gene therapy approaches, review various endpoints for measuring visual function, highlight those that are utilized in recent gene therapy trials, and provide an overview of stage 2 and 3 IRD trials through the second quarter of 2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically diverse group of progressive degenerative disorders that can result in severe visual impairment or complete blindness. Despite their predominantly monogenic inheritance patterns, the genetic complexity of over 300 identified disease-causing genes presents a significant challenge in correlating clinical phenotypes with genotypes. Achieving a molecular diagnosis is crucial for providing patients with definitive diagnostic clarity and facilitating access to emerging gene-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have markedly enhanced our ability to identify genes and genetic defects leading to IRDs, thereby propelling the development of gene-based therapies. The clinical success of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna), the first approved retinal gene therapy for RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), has spurred considerable research and development in gene-based therapies, highlighting the importance of reviewing the current status of gene therapy for IRDs, particularly those utilizing adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based therapies. As novel disease-causing mutations continue to be discovered and more targeted gene therapies are developed, integrating these treatment opportunities into the standard care for IRD patients becomes increasingly critical. This review provides an update on the diverse phenotypic–genotypic landscape of IRDs, with a specific focus on recent advances in the understanding of IRDs in children with infantile nystagmus syndrome (INS). We highlight the complexities of the genotypic–phenotypic landscape of INS-associated IRDs, including conditions such as achromatopsia, LCA, congenital stationary night blindness, and subtypes of retinitis pigmentosa. Additionally, we provide an updated overview of AAV-based gene therapies for these diseases and discuss the potential of gene-based therapies for underlying IRDs that lead to INS, offering a valuable resource for pediatric patients potentially eligible for ongoing clinical trials.

Female carriers of X‐linked inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are burdened with potentially passing their disease‐causing variant to future generations, as well as exhibiting signs of retinal disease themselves. This study aimed to investigate carriers' experiences of genetic testing, emotions relating to having affected children, and their knowledge regarding genetic testing and gene therapy. An online survey was advertised to self‐identified carriers worldwide. Two hundred and twenty‐eight carriers completed the survey with mean age of 51 years (SD ± 15.0). A majority of respondents resided in the United States of America (51%), Australia (19%), and the United Kingdom (14%). Most carriers identified with feelings of guilt (70%), concern (91%), and anxiety (88%) for their child. Female carriers who had given birth to children had significantly greater gene therapy knowledge compared to carriers who had not (p < 0.05). Respondents agreed that their eyecare provider and general practitioner helped them understand their condition (63%), however, few carriers reported receiving psychological counselling (9%) or family planning advice (5%). Most respondents (78%) agreed that gene therapy should be available to carriers. This study emphasises the importance of providing appropriate counselling to female carriers and illustrates the motivation of many to participate in emerging treatment options, such as gene therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the impact of baseline data on psychophysical and morphological outcomes of subretinal voretigene neparvovec (VN) (Luxturna, Spark Therapeutics, Inc.) treatment. Single-center, retrospective, longitudinal, consecutive case series. Patients with RPE65 -biallelic mutation–associated inherited retinal degeneration (RPE65 -IRD) treated between February 2020 and March 2022 with VN and oral immunosuppression according to the manufacturer's recommendation by one surgeon (F.G.H.). Retrospective analysis of surgical and clinical records, ancillary testing, and retinal imaging after VN therapy for RPE65 -IRD. Descriptive statistics compared data at baseline up to 32 months post-treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low-luminance VA (LLVA), Goldmann visual fields (GVFs), chromatic full-field stimulus threshold (FST) testing (FST), scotopic and photopic 2-color threshold perimetry (2CTP), and multimodal retinal imaging. Thirty eyes of 19 patients were analyzed (10 pediatric patients < 20 years; 20 adult patients > 20 years of age; overall range: 8–40 years) with a median follow-up of 15 months (range, 1–32). The fovea was completely or partially detached in 16 eyes, attached in 12 eyes, and not assessable in 2 eyes on intraoperative imaging. Median BCVA at baseline was better in the pediatric group (P < 0.05) and did not change significantly independent of age. Meaningful loss of BCVA (≥ 0.3 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) occurred in 5 of 18 adult eyes, and a meaningful gain (≥–0.3 logMAR) occurred in 2 of 18 adult and 2 of 8 pediatric eyes. The LLVA and scotopic 2CTP improved considerably in pediatric patients. Scotopic blue FST improved at all ages but more in pediatric patients (8/8 eyes gained ≥ 10 decibels [dB]; P < 0.05). In pediatric patients, median GVF improved by 20% for target V4e and by 50% for target III4e (target I4e not detected). Novel atrophy developed in 13 of 26 eyes at the site of the bleb or peripheral of vascular arcades. Improvements in FST did not correlate with development of chorioretinal atrophy at 12 months. Mean central retinal thickness was 165.87 μm (± 26.26) at baseline (30 eyes) and 157.69 μm (± 30.3) at 12 months (26 eyes). Eight adult patients were treated unilaterally. The untreated eyes did not show meaningful changes during follow-up. These data in a clinical setting show the effectiveness of VN therapy with stable median BCVA and mean retinal thickness and improvements of LLVA, FST, and 2CTP up to 32 months. Treatment effects were superior in the pediatric group. We observed new chorioretinal atrophy in 50% of the treated eyes. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This retrospective study examines the clinical characteristics and underlying genetic variants that exist in a Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) patient cohort evaluated at the inherited retinal disease (IRD) clinic at the University of Minnesota (UMN)/M Health System. Our LCA cohort consisted of 33 non-syndromic patients and one patient with Joubert syndrome. We report their relevant history, clinical findings, and genetic testing results. We monitored disease presentation utilizing ocular coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Electroretinogram testing (ERG) was performed in patients when clinically indicated. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and genetic counseling was offered to all evaluated patients. Advanced photoreceptor loss was noted in 85.7% of the subjects. All patients who underwent FAF had findings of either a ring of macular hypo/hyper AF or peripheral hypo-AF. All patients had abnormal ERG findings. A diagnostic genetic test result was identified in 74.2% of the patients via NGS single-gene testing or panel testing. Two patients in our cohort qualified for Luxturna® and both received treatment at the time of this study. These data will help IRD specialists to understand the genetic variants and clinical presentations that characterize our patient population in the Midwest region of the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advances in molecular genetics over the past three decades have helped identify a substantial number of genetic variants causing inherited eye diseases that can be identified rapidly by appropriate genetic tests in a clinically useful window. With this progression of knowledge, the roles of genetics and ophthalmology in patient care have become increasingly intertwined, and the necessity for subspecialists in the field of ophthalmic genetics is of paramount importance. As a result of continual medical specialization, technological progress in genetics and knowledge garnered by over a century and a half of cataloguing eye pathology, ophthalmic genetics has become an emerging subspecialty within ophthalmology. By virtue of its rapidly changing advances, genetics and genomics serves a large role within ophthalmology, and subspecialists with the same level of detailed and broad knowledge as any other ophthalmology subspecialty are now required in order to meet the growing needs of the expanding population.

NR2E3 is a nuclear hormone receptor gene required for the correct development of the retinal rod photoreceptors. Expression of NR2E3 protein in rod cell precursors suppresses cone-specific gene expression and, in concert with other transcription factors including NRL, activates the expression of rod-specific genes. Pathogenic variants involving NR2E3 cause a spectrum of retinopathies, including enhanced S-cone syndrome, Goldmann–Favre syndrome, retinitis pigmentosa, and clumped pigmentary retinal degeneration, with limited evidence of genotype–phenotype correlations. A common feature of NR2E3-related disease is an abnormally high number of cone photoreceptors that are sensitive to short wavelength light, the S-cones. This characteristic has been supported by mouse studies, which have also revealed that loss of Nr2e3 function causes photoreceptors to develop as cells that are intermediate between rods and cones. While there is currently no available cure for NR2E3-related retinopathies, there are a number of emerging therapeutic strategies under investigation, including the use of viral gene therapy and gene editing, that have shown promise for the future treatment of patients with NR2E3 variants and other inherited retinal diseases. This review provides a detailed overview of the current understanding of the role of NR2E3 in normal development and disease, and the associated clinical phenotypes, animal models, and therapeutic studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To determine the validity of the validate the adult patient-reported outcome measure tools, the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) and Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire (MVAQ), in adolescent patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). Ninety-one adolescent patients diagnosed with IRDs were recruited at the Hospital for Sick Children (University of Toronto) and the Kellogg Eye Center (University of Michigan). The patients were administered the MRDQ, MVAQ, and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Test-retest variability was assessed in eighteen patients within 14 days of the initial administration. Adolescent responses were analyzed for validity and reliability. As a further validation step, comparisons were made to adult data from the original MRDQ and MVAQ studies to ensure consistency in response ranges. The existing MRDQ and MVAQ content and format could accurately detect the impact of IRD on activities of daily living in adolescents with IRDs. No floor/ceiling effects were identified, test-retest reliability was established (r = 0.73–0.86), and no items were excluded after differential item functioning analysis. Domain and trait associations with visual acuity and IRD phenotypes were similar between adolescents and adults. The MRDQ and MVAQ are psychometrically validated questionnaires for which we have shown validity for use in adolescent patients with IRDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ongoing trials for retinitis pigmentosa (RP) are genotype-specific, with most trials conducted on European cohorts. Due to genetic differences across diverse ancestries and populations, these therapies may not be efficacious in East Asians. A literature search was conducted from 1966 to September 2022 for cohort studies on East Asian populations reporting on non-syndromic RP genotypes and variants. Population-weighted prevalence was used to determine the genotypes and individual variants across the entire cohort. The carrier prevalence of common variants was compared against those in Europe. A total of 12 articles describing 2,932 clinically diagnosed East Asian RP probands were included. We identified 876 variants across 54 genes. The most common genotypes included USH2A, EYS, RPGR, ABCA4, PRPF31, RHO, RP1, RP2, PDE6B and SNRNP200, with USH2A as the most common (17.1%). Overall, 60.5% of probands with clinically relevant variants were found to have one of the genotypes above, with 543/876 (62.0%) of the variants occurring in these genes. The most frequently reported variant was USH2A missense variant c.2802T>G/p.C934W (4.9%). Carrier prevalence of these variants was significantly different (p < 0.0001) than in Europe. USH2A was the most commonly affected RP gene in this East Asian cohort, although sub-population analysis revealed distinct genotype prevalence patterns. While the genotypes are similar between East Asia and European cohorts, variants are specific to East Asia. The identification of several prevalent variants in USH2A and EYS provides an opportunity for the development of therapeutics that are relevant for East Asia patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The visual process begins with the absorption of photons by photopigments of cone and rod photoreceptors in the retina. In this process, the signal is first amplified by a cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-based signaling cascade and then converted into an electrical signal by cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels. CNG channels are purely ligand-gated channels whose activity can be controlled by cGMP, which induces a depolarizing Na+/Ca2+ current upon binding to the channel. Structurally, CNG channels belong to the superfamily of pore-loop cation channels and share structural similarities with hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide (HCN) and voltage-gated potassium (KCN) channels. Cone and rod photoreceptors express distinct CNG channels encoded by homologous genes. Mutations in the genes encoding the rod CNG channel (CNGA1 and CNGB1) result in retinitis-pigmentosa-type blindness. Mutations in the genes encoding the cone CNG channel (CNGA3 and CNGB3) lead to achromatopsia. Here, we review the molecular properties of CNG channels and describe their physiological and pathophysiological roles in the retina. Moreover, we summarize recent activities in the field of gene therapy aimed at developing the first gene therapies for CNG channelopathies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent approval of voretigene neparvovec (Luxturna®) for patients with biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated inherited retinal dystrophy with viable retinal cells represents an important step in the development of ocular gene therapies. Herein, we review studies investigating the episomal persistence of different recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector genomes and the preclinical and clinical evidence of long-term effects of different RPE65 gene replacement therapies. A targeted review of articles published between 1974 and January 2021 in Medline®, Embase®, and other databases was conducted, followed by a descriptive longitudinal analysis of the clinical trial outcomes of voretigene neparvovec. Following an initial screening, 14 publications examining the episomal persistence of different rAAV genomes and 71 publications evaluating gene therapies in animal models were included. Viral genomes were found to persist for at least 22 months (longest study follow-up) as transcriptionally active episomes. Treatment effects lasting almost a decade were reported in canine disease models, with more pronounced effects the earlier the intervention. The clinical trial outcomes of voretigene neparvovec are consistent with preclinical findings and reveal sustained results for up to 7.5 years for the full-field light sensitivity threshold test and 5 years for the multi-luminance mobility test in the Phase I and Phase III trials, respectively. In conclusion, the therapeutic effect of voretigene neparvovec lasts for at least a decade in animal models and 7.5 years in human subjects. Since retinal cells can retain functionality over their lifetime after transduction, these effects may be expected to last even longer in patients with a sufficient number of outer retinal cells at the time of intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB) is an inherited retinal disease (IRD) that causes night blindness in childhood with heterogeneous genetic, electrophysical, and clinical characteristics. The development of sequencing technologies and gene therapy have increased the ease and urgency of diagnosing IRDs. This study describes seven Taiwanese patients from six unrelated families examined at a tertiary referral center, diagnosed with CSNB, and confirmed by genetic testing. Complete ophthalmic exams included best corrected visual acuity, retinal imaging, and an electroretinogram. The effects of identified novel variants were predicted using clinical details, protein prediction tools, and conservation scores. One patient had an autosomal dominant CSNB with a RHO variant; five patients had complete CSNB with variants in GRM6, TRPM1, and NYX; and one patient had incomplete CSNB with variants in CACNA1F. The patients had Riggs and Schubert–Bornschein types of CSNB with autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked inheritance patterns. This is the first report of CSNB patients in Taiwan with confirmed genetic testing, providing novel perspectives on molecular etiology and genotype–phenotype correlation of CSNB. Particularly, variants in TRPM1, NYX, and CACNA1F in our patient cohort have not previously been described, although their clinical significance needs further study. Additional study is needed for the genotype–phenotype correlation of different mutations causing CSNB. In addition to genetic etiology, the future of gene therapy for CSNB patients is reviewed and discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited Retinal Diseases (IRDs) are considered one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. However, the majority of them still lack a safe and effective treatment due to their complexity and genetic heterogeneity. Recently, gene therapy is gaining importance as an efficient strategy to address IRDs which were previously considered incurable. The development of the clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system has strongly empowered the field of gene therapy. However, successful gene modifications rely on the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 components into the complex three-dimensional (3D) architecture of the human retinal tissue. Intriguing findings in the field of nanoparticles (NPs) meet all the criteria required for CRISPR-Cas9 delivery and have made a great contribution toward its therapeutic applications. In addition, exploiting induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology and in vitro 3D retinal organoids paved the way for prospective clinical trials of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in treating IRDs. This review highlights important advances in NP-based gene therapy, the CRISPR-Cas9 system, and iPSC-derived retinal organoids with a focus on IRDs. Collectively, these studies establish a multidisciplinary approach by integrating nanomedicine and stem cell technologies and demonstrate the utility of retina organoids in developing effective therapies for IRDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) type 2, due to disease‐causing variants in RPE65, is characterized by severe visual loss in early infancy. Current treatments include voretigene neparvovec‐rzyl (VN) for RPE65‐associated LCA. Herein, we present the long‐term follow‐up of a patient treated with VN using quantitative autofluorescence (488 nm excitation). Case Report: A 9‐year‐old girl with a diagnosis of LCA with biallelic variants in RPE65 presented for evaluation. The patient underwent VN treatment at the age of 11. The patient returned to clinic at age of 19 at which time imaging revealed evidence of chorioretinal atrophy. Quantitative autofluorescence performed prior to gene therapy and at 6‐ and 8‐year follow‐up revealed a central area of fundus autofluorescence. Discussion This case report demonstrates acquisition of fundus autofluorescence at 6‐ and 8‐year follow‐up despite the development of chorioretinal atrophy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) type 2, due to disease‐causing variants in RPE65, is characterized by severe visual loss in early infancy. Current treatments include voretigene neparvovec‐rzyl (VN) for RPE65‐associated LCA. Herein, we present the long‐term follow‐up of a patient treated with VN using quantitative autofluorescence (488 nm excitation). Case Report A 9‐year‐old girl with a diagnosis of LCA with biallelic variants in RPE65 presented for evaluation. The patient underwent VN treatment at the age of 11. The patient returned to clinic at age of 19 at which time imaging revealed evidence of chorioretinal atrophy. Quantitative autofluorescence performed prior to gene therapy and at 6‐ and 8‐year follow‐up revealed a central area of fundus autofluorescence. Discussion This case report demonstrates acquisition of fundus autofluorescence at 6‐ and 8‐year follow‐up despite the development of chorioretinal atrophy.

Severe light sensitivity is a feature common to a range of ophthalmological and neurological diseases. In inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) particularly, this may be accompanied by significant visual disruption. These symptoms are extremely debilitating for affected individuals and have significant implications in terms of day-to-day activities. Underlying mechanisms remain to be fully elucidated. Currently, there are many assessments of photoaversion (PA), however, all have limitations, with quantitative measurement in particular needing further evaluation. To understand the complexities associated with photoaversion from different pathologies, qualitative and quantitative assessments of the light aversion response must be standardized. There is no treatment to date, and strategies to alleviate symptoms focus on light avoidance. With respect to IRDs, however, gene therapy is currently being investigated in clinical trials and promising and further treatments may be on the horizon. The better characterization of these symptoms is an important end point measure in IRD gene therapy trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Parents of children living with chronic but manageable conditions hope for improved therapies or cures, including Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). Multiple pediatric clinical trials for ATMPs are underway, but the risk profile of ATMPs for chronic conditions is largely unknown and likely different than for terminal pediatric illnesses. Applying Protection Motivation Theory modified to the context of pediatric ATMP clinical trial enrollment, our study analyses information needs of parents of children living with chronic manageable conditions: Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) or Inherited Retinal Diseases (IRD). Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 parents of children living with T1D and 14 parents of children living with an IRD about: a) family background and the diagnostic experience; b) awareness of gene and stem cell therapy research and clinical trials for T1D and IRD; c) information sources on trials and responses to that information; d) attitudes to trial participation, including internationally; e) understanding of trial purpose and process; and f) any experiences with trial participation. We then discussed a pediatric ATMP clinical trial information sheet, which we developed with experts. We applied directed qualitative content analysis, based on PMT, to examine the information preferences of parents in deciding whether to enrol their children in stem cell or gene therapy clinical trials. Results Parents balanced trial risks against their child’s ability to cope with the chronic condition. The better the child’s ability to cope with vision impairment or insulin management, the less likely parents were to assume trial risks. Conversely, if the child struggled with his/her vision loss, parents were more likely to be interested in trial participation, but only if the risks were low and likelihood for potential benefit was high. Conclusions Fear of adverse events as part of threat appraisal was the predominant consideration for parents in considering whether to enroll their child living with a manageable, chronic condition in a pediatric clinical trial of an ATMP. This consideration outweighed potential benefits and severity of their child’s condition. Parents called for available safety data and fulsome communication processes that would enable them to make informed decisions about clinical trial enrolment on behalf of their children.

Biallelic mutations in the RCBTB1 gene cause retinal dystrophy. Here, we characterized the effects of RCBTB1 gene deficiency in retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells derived from a patient with RCBTB1‐associated retinopathy and restored RCBTB1 expression in these cells using adeno‐associated viral (AAV) vectors. Induced pluripotent stem cells derived from a patient with compound heterozygous RCBTB1 mutations (c.170delG and c.707delA) and healthy control subjects were differentiated into RPE cells. RPE cells were treated with AAV vectors carrying a RCBTB1 transgene. Patient‐derived RPE cells showed reduced expression of RCBTB1. Expression of NFE2L2 showed a non‐significant reduction in patient RPE cells compared with controls, while expression of its target genes (RXRA, IDH1 and SLC25A25) was significantly reduced. Trans‐epithelial electrical resistance, surface microvillus densities and primary cilium lengths were reduced in patient‐derived RPE cells, compared with controls. Treatment of patient RPE with AAV vectors significantly increased RCBTB1, NFE2L2 and RXRA expression and cilium lengths. Our study provides the first report examining the phenotype of RPE cells derived from a patient with RCBTB1‐associated retinopathy. Furthermore, treatment of patient‐derived RPE with AAV‐RCBTB1 vectors corrected deficits in gene expression and RPE ultrastructure, supporting the use of gene replacement therapy for treating this inherited retinal disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) comprise a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting the retina. Caused by mutations in over 300 genes, IRDs result in visual impairment due to dysfunction and degeneration of photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelium, or the choroid. Important photoreceptor IRDs include retinitis pigmentosa and Leber congenital amaurosis. Macular dystrophies include Stargardt and Best disease. Currently, IRDs are largely incurable but the landscape of treatment options is rapidly changing for these diseases which, untreated, result in severe visual impairment and blindness.Advances in DNA delivery to the retina and improved genetic diagnosis of IRDs have led to a new era of research into gene therapy for these vision-threatening disorders. Gene therapy is a compelling approach due to the monogenic nature of most IRDs, with the retina being a favourable target for administering genetic vectors due to its immunoprivileged environment, direct visibility, and multiple methods to assess sensitivity and function. Generally, retinal gene therapy involves a subretinal or intravitreal injection of a viral vector, which infects target cells to deliver a therapeutic gene, or transgene. A gene augmentation strategy introduces a functioning copy of a gene to restore expression of a mutated gene, whereas a gene-editing strategy aims to directly edit and correct the mutation. Common delivery vectors include adeno-associated virus (AAV) and lentivirus.Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna) became the first FDA-approved direct gene therapy in December 2017, and the Australian TGA followed suit in August 2020. More are projected to follow, with clinical trials underway for many other IRDs.This review provides an overview of gene therapy for IRDs, including current progress and challenges. A companion article in this issue details target patient populations for IRD gene therapy, and how optometrists can assist in assessing individuals who may be eligible for current and future therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review presents the phenotypic and genotypic profiles of a select group of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) that are currently the focus of retinal gene therapy trials globally. Research progress in IRD treatment trials may soon lead to their availability in Australia and New Zealand, as either approved treatment or a clinical trial. The salient clinical characteristics of retinitis pigmentosa-the largest IRD category-are highlighted, with specific reference to RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis, followed by other specific IRDs, namely choroideremia and ABCA4-associated Stargardt disease. These IRDs are selected based on their candidacy for gene therapy. Guidance on the clinical diagnostic tests that support each of these diagnoses will be presented. More broadly, the most useful structure and function measures to monitor IRD progression is discussed, along with the key assessments that offer differential diagnostic insight. This review is intended to be a clinical guide for optometrists, to assist in assessment and management of individuals who may be eligible for current and future gene therapies. A companion article in this issue will provide an overview of the basic principles of gene therapy and its development as a new treatment for inherited retinal diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To review preclinical and clinical advances in gene therapy, with a focus on gene editing technologies, and application to inherited retinal disease. Methods: A narrative overview of the literature, summarizing the state-of-the-art in clinical gene therapy for inherited retinal disease, as well as the science and application of new gene editing technology. Results: The last three years has seen the first FDA approval of an in vivo gene replacement therapy for a hereditary blinding eye disease and, recently, the first clinical application of an in vivo gene editing technique. Limitations and challenges in this evolving field are highlighted, as well as new technologies developed to address the multitude of molecular mechanisms of disease. Conclusion: Genetic therapy for the treatment of inherited retinal disease is a rapidly expanding area of ophthalmology. New technologies have revolutionized the field of genome engineering and rekindled an interest in precision medicines for these conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders characterised by photoreceptor degeneration or dysfunction. These disorders typically present with severe vision loss that can be progressive, with disease onset ranging from congenital to late adulthood. The advances in genetics, retinal imaging and molecular biology, have conspired to create the ideal environment for establishing treatments for IRDs, with the first approved gene therapy and the commencement of multiple clinical trials. The scope of this review is to familiarise clinicians and scientists with the current management and the prospects for novel therapies for: (1) macular dystrophies, (2) cone and cone‐rod dystrophies, (3) cone dysfunction syndromes, (4) Leber congenital amaurosis, (5) rod‐cone dystrophies, (6) rod dysfunction syndromes and (7) chorioretinal dystrophies. We also briefly summarise the investigated end points for the ongoing trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Usher syndrome has three subtypes, each being clinically and genetically heterogeneous characterised by sensorineural hearing loss and retinitis pigmentosa (RP), with or without vestibular dysfunction. It is the most common cause of deaf–blindness worldwide with a prevalence of between 4 and 17 in 100 000. To date, 10 causative genes have been identified for Usher syndrome, with MYO7A accounting for >50% of type 1 and USH2A contributing to approximately 80% of type 2 Usher syndrome. Variants in these genes can also cause non-syndromic RP and deafness. Genotype–phenotype correlations have been described for several of the Usher genes. Hearing loss is managed with hearing aids and cochlear implants, which has made a significant improvement in quality of life for patients. While there is currently no available approved treatment for the RP, various therapeutic strategies are in development or in clinical trials for Usher syndrome, including gene replacement, gene editing, antisense oligonucleotides and small molecule drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Parents of children living with chronic but manageable conditions hope for improved therapies or cures, including Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). Multiple pediatric clinical trials for ATMPs are underway, but the risk profile of ATMPs for chronic conditions is largely unknown and likely different than for terminal pediatric illnesses. Applying Protection Motivation Theory modified to the context of pediatric ATMP clinical trial enrollment, our study analyses information needs of parents of children living with chronic manageable conditions: Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) or Inherited Retinal Diseases (IRD).Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 parents of children living with T1D and 14 parents of children living with an IRD about: a) family background and the diagnostic experience; b) awareness of gene and stem cell therapy research and clinical trials for T1D and IRD; c) information sources on trials and responses to that information; d) attitudes to trial participation, including internationally; e) understanding of trial purpose and process; and f) any experiences with trial participation. We then discussed a pediatric ATMP clinical trial information sheet, which we developed with experts. We applied directed qualitative content analysis, based on PMT, to examine the information preferences of parents in deciding whether to enrol their children in stem cell or gene therapy clinical trials.Results: Parents balanced trial risks against their child's ability to cope with the chronic condition. The better the child's ability to cope with vision impairment or insulin management, the less likely parents were to assume trial risks. Conversely, if the child struggled with his/her vision loss, parents were more likely to be interested in trial participation, but only if the risks were low and likelihood for potential benefit was high.Conclusions: Fear of adverse events as part of threat appraisal was the predominant consideration for parents in considering whether to enroll their child living with a manageable, chronic condition in a pediatric clinical trial of an ATMP. This consideration outweighed potential benefits and severity of their child's condition. Parents called for available safety data and fulsome communication processes that would enable them to make informed decisions about clinical trial enrolment on behalf of their children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite being the most prevalent cause of inherited blindness in children, Stargardt disease is yet to achieve the same clinical trial success as has been achieved for other inherited retinal diseases. With an early age of onset and continual progression of disease over the life course of an individual, Stargardt disease appears to lend itself to therapeutic intervention. However, the aetiology provides issues not encountered with the likes of choroideremia and X-linked retinitis pigmentosa and this has led to a spectrum of treatment strategies that approach the problem from different aspects. These include therapeutics ranging from small molecules and anti-sense oligonucleotides to viral gene supplementation and cell replacement. The advancing development of CRISPR-based molecular tools is also likely to contribute to future therapies by way of genome editing. In this we review, we consider the most recent pre-clinical and clinical trial data relating to the different strategies being applied to the problem of generating a treatment for the large cohort of Stargardt disease patients worldwide.

Abstract Inherited retinal disease (IRD) affects about 1 in 3000 to 1 in 5000 individuals and is now believed to be the most common cause of blindness registration in developed countries. Until recently, the management of such conditions had been exclusively supportive. However, advances in molecular biology and medical engineering have now seen the rise of a variety of approaches to restore vision in patients with IRDs. Optogenetic approaches are primarily aimed at rendering secondary and tertiary neurons of the retina light-sensitive in order to replace degenerate or dysfunctional photoreceptors. Such approaches are attractive because they provide a "causative gene-independent" strategy, which may prove suitable for a variety of patients with IRD. We discuss theoretical and practical considerations in the selection of optogenetic molecules, vectors, surgical approaches and review previous trials of optogenetics for vision restoration. Optogenetic approaches to vision restoration have yielded promising results in pre-clinical trials and a phase I/II clinical trial is currently underway (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02556736). Despite the significant inroads made in recent years, the ideal optogenetic molecule, vector and surgical approach have yet to be established. Highlights • Optogenetic approaches to vision restoration seek to restore vision to patients with inherited retinal diseases by rendering secondary and tertiary neurones of the retina light-sensitive. • Two principal classes of molecule can be used: Type 1 (microbial) opsins or Type 2 (animal) opsins. • Pre-clinical trials of optogenetic approaches in animal models suggest that the technique may restore vision in previously blind animals, with the threshold for activation being within 1-2 log units of the threshold for cone activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are progressive degenerative diseases which cause gradual vision loss or complete blindness. As over 270 gene mutations have been identified in the underlying pathology of IRDs, gene therapy as a treatment modality has been an increasingly active realm of investigation. Currently, the most common vehicle of ocular gene delivery is the adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector. This is injected into the immune-privileged subretinal space to mediate transgene expression in retinal cells. Although numerous animal models of IRDs have demonstrated successful outcomes following AAV-mediated gene delivery, many of these studies fail to translate into successful outcomes in clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to A) comparatively assess preclinical and clinical IRD trials in which the success of AAV-mediated therapy failed to translate between animal and human participants B) discuss factors which may complicate the translatability of gene therapy in animals to results in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The genes CNGA1 and CNGB1 encode the alpha and beta subunits of the rod CNG channel, a ligand-gated cation channel whose activity is controlled by cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Autosomal inherited mutations in either of the genes lead to a progressive rod-cone retinopathy known as retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The rod CNG channel is expressed in the plasma membrane of the outer segment and functions as a molecular switch that converts light-mediated changes in cGMP into a voltage and Ca2+ signal. Here, we will first review the molecular properties and physiological role of the rod CNG channel and then discuss the characteristics of CNG-related RP. Finally, we will summarize recent activities in the field of gene therapy aimed at developing therapies for CNG-related RP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The past decade has seen major advances in gene-based therapies, many of which show promise for translation to human disease. At the forefront of research in this field is ocular disease, as the eye lends itself to gene-based interventions due to its accessibility, relatively immune-privileged status, and ability to be non-invasively monitored. A landmark study in 2001 demonstrating successful gene therapy in a large-animal model for Leber congenital amaurosis set the stage for translation of these strategies from the bench to the bedside. Multiple clinical trials have since initiated for various retinal diseases, and further improvements in gene therapy techniques have engendered optimism for alleviating inherited blinding disorders. This article provides an overview of gene-based strategies for retinal disease, current clinical trials that engage these strategies, and the latest techniques in genome engineering, which could serve as the next frontline of therapeutic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) are a diverse group of conditions that are often characterized by the loss of photoreceptors and blindness. Recent innovations in molecular biology and genomics have allowed us to identify the causative defects behind these dystrophies and to design therapeutics that target specific mechanisms of retinal disease. Recently, the FDA approved the first in vivo gene therapy for one of these hereditary blinding conditions. Current clinical trials are exploring new therapies that could provide treatment for a growing number of retinal dystrophies. While the field has had early success with gene augmentation strategies for treating retinal disease based on loss-of-function mutations, many novel approaches hold the promise of offering therapies that span the full spectrum of causative mutations and mechanisms. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the approaches currently in development including a discussion of retinal neuroprotection, gene therapies (gene augmentation, gene editing, RNA modification, optogenetics), and regenerative stem or precursor cell-based therapies. Our review focuses on technologies that are being developed for clinical translation or are in active clinical trials and discusses the advantages and limitations for each approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite being the most prevalent cause of inherited blindness in children, Stargardt disease is yet to achieve the same clinical trial success as has been achieved for other inherited retinal diseases. With an early age of onset and continual progression of disease over the life course of an individual, Stargardt disease appears to lend itself to therapeutic intervention. However, the aetiology provides issues not encountered with the likes of choroideremia and X-linked retinitis pigmentosa and this has led to a spectrum of treatment strategies that approach the problem from different aspects. These include therapeutics ranging from small molecules and anti-sense oligonucleotides to viral gene supplementation and cell replacement. The advancing development of CRISPR-based molecular tools is also likely to contribute to future therapies by way of genome editing. In this we review, we consider the most recent pre-clinical and clinical trial data relating to the different strategies being applied to the problem of generating a treatment for the large cohort of Stargardt disease patients worldwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRD) comprise a heterogeneous set of clinical and genetic disorders that lead to blindness. Given the emerging opportunities in precision medicine and gene therapy, it has become increasingly important to determine whether DNA variants with uncertain significance (VUS) are responsible for patients' IRD. This research was performed to assess the functional consequence of six VUS identified in patients with IRD. Clinical assessments included an ophthalmic examination, best-corrected visual acuity, and kinetic perimetry. Imaging was acquired with the Optos ultra-widefield camera and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Genetic testing was performed by Molecular Vision Laboratories. VUS that were predicted to alter splicing were analyzed with a minigene assay, which revealed that VUS in the genes OPA1, CNGB1, and CLUAP1 altered spicing mechanisms. Due to emerging gene and cell therapies, these results expand the genotype-phenotype correlations for patients diagnosed with an IRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders causing progressive loss of vision, affecting approximately one in 1000 people worldwide. Gene augmentation therapy, which typically involves using adeno-associated viral vectors for delivery of healthy gene copies to affected tissues, has shown great promise as a strategy for the treatment of IRDs. However, the use of viruses is associated with several limitations, including harmful immune responses, genome integration, and limited gene carrying capacity. Here, we review the advances in non-viral gene augmentation strategies, such as the use of plasmids with minimal bacterial backbones and scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR) sequences, that have the capability to overcome these weaknesses by accommodating genes of any size and maintaining episomal transgene expression with a lower risk of eliciting an immune response. Low retinal transfection rates remain a limitation, but various strategies, including coupling the DNA with different types of chemical vehicles (nanoparticles) and the use of electrical methods such as iontophoresis and electrotransfection to aid cell entry, have shown promise in preclinical studies. Non-viral gene therapy may offer a safer and effective option for future treatment of IRDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Advances in molecular research have culminated in the development of novel gene-based therapies for inherited retinal diseases. We have recently witnessed several groundbreaking clinical studies that ultimately led to approval of Luxturna, the first gene therapy for an inherited retinal disease. In parallel, international research community has been engaged in conducting gene therapy trials for another more common inherited retinal disease known as choroideremia and with phase III clinical trials now underway, approval of this therapy is poised to follow suit. This chapter discusses new insights into clinical phenotyping and molecular genetic testing in choroideremia with review of molecular mechanisms implicated in its pathogenesis. We provide an update on current gene therapy trials and discuss potential inclusion of female carries in future clinical studies. Alternative molecular therapies are discussed including suitability of CRISPR gene editing, small molecule nonsense suppression therapy and vision restoration strategies in late stage choroideremia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]