Search

Electron projection lithography (EPL) is a realistic technology for the 65nm node and below, as a complementary technology of optical lithography especially for contacts and gate layers because of its high resolution and large process margin. Nikon has developed an EPL exposure tool as an electron-beam (EB) stepper and the first generation EB stepper; NSR-EB1A is now almost completed as an R&D tool for the 65nm technology node. Using a ϕ200mm reticle, a 20mm×25mm exposure field is realized. Full-field exposure performance of NSR-EB1A is shown. A 70nm isolated line and 1:1 nested lines are simultaneously resolved, as are 50nm 1:2 nested lines. 60nm contact holes are resolved with a depth of focus over a 10μm range and dosage window over ±6%. Stitching accuracy is about 20nm (3σ) and the single machine overlay is about 30nm (mean + 3σ). These data mean sufficient performance for device manufacturing of the 65nm technology node. The concept of a large subfield is one candidate for resolution and throughput e...

Electron projection lithography (EPL) is one of the promising technologies below the 65 nm node, especially for contact hole and gate layers. Nikon is developing an EPL exposure tool as an electron beam (EB) stepper and the first generation EB stepper is now being manufactured. The voltage of 100 kV is adopted for electron beam acceleration. The subfield size is 0.25 mm×0.25 mm on the wafer and the deflection width of the electron beam is 5 mm on the wafer. The magnification of the projection optics is 1/4. A 5 mm×25 mm area from the φ200 mm reticle can be exposed by the combination of beam deflection and stage scanning motion (dynamic exposure). This area is called “a mechanical stripe.” After one mechanical stripe exposure, the reticle and wafer stages turn around and the next exposure of the adjacent mechanical stripe starts as a scan and stitch stage motion. Finally, a 20 mm×25 mm exposure field from the φ200 mm reticle is exposed. We report the first dynamic exposure in the history of EPL although only a φ100 mm reticle was used. A 5 mm×10 mm area was used as the mechanical stripe and 10 mm×10 mm exposure fields were exposed. 100 nm nested lines were resolved in the entire exposure field and stitching accuracies of 17–18 nm (3σ) are obtained. There remain systematic errors, and stitching accuracy less than 15 nm will be achieved after fine adjustment of the subfield positions. We feel the reality of EPL is now sufficiently proven.