Search

Renal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare neoplasm in adults, but with an aggressive behavior. It is diagnosed in most cases in advanced stages. The invasion of the digestive tract by this type of tumor is rare, due to the anatomical arrangement of the colon, however, when it occurs, it carries a poor prognosis for the patient. Digestive endoscopy allows us to reach a definitive diagnosis since these patients usually present digestive manifestations, such as diarrhoea, digestive bleeding or abdominal pain.

The use of premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) is not widely established in western countries. The primary aim was to compare gastric visibility according to the total visibility score (TVS). As secondary aim to assess complications, diagnostic yield, endoscopic procedure time, sedation dose and patient' satisfaction.Single center prospective cohort study including consecutive adults undergoing an UGE in the afternoon working shift. After completing enrolment in the control group, patients were administered 200 mg simethicone and 500 mg N-acetylcysteine diluted in 100 ml of water15 minutes before the procedure. All procedures were recorded and a single, blinded endoscopist evaluated the TVS after recruitment of both cohorts. Patient' satisfaction was evaluated using the Spanish translation of the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire.205 patients were included, 103 females (50.2%) with a median age of 54.8-years (IQR: 41.2-65.2). 104 were enrolled to the control group and 101 to the intervention group. Patients receiving premedication presented a higher rate of adequate gastric visibility (74.3% vs 45.2; difference 95% CI: 16,3-41,9%, p0.001) and excellent (23.8% vs 7.7%; difference 95% CI: 6,3-25,8%, p=0.002). Propofol dose was similar, although median procedure time was lower in the group of no intervention [5 (IQR: 4-7) vs 6 minutes (IQR: 5-7); p=0.03]. Procedure related adverse events were similar, except that patient without premedication experienced more nausea episodes. Major and minor endoscopic findings and the satisfaction questionnaire showed no differences between both groups.Patients receiving premedication with simethicone and N-acetylcysteine presented a better gastric visibility score, without increase in adverse events or affecting the patients' satisfaction.

Background and Aims Clinical trials and real-life studies with ustekinumab in Crohn’s disease [CD] have revealed a good efficacy and safety profile. However, these data are scarcely available in elderly patients. Therefore, we aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in elderly patients with CD. Methods Elderly patients [>60 years old] from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with ustekinumab due to CD were included. Every patient was matched with two controls under 60 years of age, according to anti-tumour necrosis factor use and smoking habit. Values for the Harvey–Bradshaw Index [HBI], endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [FC] were recorded at baseline and at weeks 16, 32 and 54. Results In total, 648 patients were included, 212 of whom were elderly. Effectiveness was similar between young and elderly patients during the follow-up. Steroid-free remission was similar at week 16 [54.6 vs 51.4%, p = 0.20], 32 [53.0% vs 54.5%, p = 0.26] and 54 [57.8% vs 51.1%, p = 0.21]. Persistence of ustekinumab as maintenance therapy was similar in both age groups [log-rank test; p = 0.91]. There was no difference in the rate of adverse effects [14.2% vs 11.2%, p = 0.350], including severe infections [7.1% vs 7.3%, p = 1.00], except for the occurrence of de novo neoplasms, which was higher in older patients [0.7% vs 4.3%, p = 0.003]. Conclusions Ustekinumab is as effective in elderly patients with CD as it is in non-elderly patients. The safety profile also seems to be similar except for a higher rate of de novo neoplasms, probably related to the age of the elderly patients.

We present the case of a 51-year-old female with a 2-month history of intense anal pain and rectal bleeding. A digital rectal exam revealed a possible lower rectal mass. A colonoscopy was then performed that showed a 5 x 6-cm lesion in the middle rectum and a second 3-cm lesion in the lower rectum, without affecting the anal canal. Multiple biopsies were taken and the histopathologic analysis revealed a moderately differentiated squamous-cell proliferation invading beyond the lamina propria. The CT scan confirmed a middle rectum T4N2bM0 and a lower rectum T3N0M0 synchronous neoplasia. These findings were compatible with a synchronous squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC).

We present the case of a 71-years-old male with a history of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with palliative treatment. He was admitted to our hospital with hematochezia and anemia (Hemoglobin 10.6 g/dl).

We appreciate the interest of Sánchez-Luna et al. in our article "Endoscopic internal drainage using transmural double-pigtail stents in leaks following upper gastrointestinal tract surgery", and find their suggestion about using softer urological double pigtail stents (DPS) for endoscopic internal drainage (EID) interesting.

Introduccion: la pandemia mundial por SARS-CoV-2 obligo a paralizar las unidades de endoscopia. Previamente a la reanudacion de la actividad endoscopica disenamos un protocolo de valoracion de gastroscopias y colonoscopias, desprogramadas durante la pandemia, denegando las no indicadas y priorizando las indicadas. Metodos: establecimos dos tipos de denegacion: a) contexto covid-19 en ≤ 50 anos sin sintomas de alarma y baja probabilidad de hallazgos endoscopicos relevantes; y b) contexto inadecuado por no ser acordes con las guias o protocolos clinicos. Las denegaciones se archivaron en la historia clinica del paciente. Clasificamos las adecuadas en preferentes, convencionales y seguimiento. Comparamos las denegadas por especialidad. Valoramos los hallazgos de las preferentes. Resultados: valoramos 1.658 peticiones (44 % gastroscopias, 56 % colonoscopias) entre el 16 marzo y el 30 junio de 2020. Se consideraron adecuadas 1.164 (70 %), de ellas preferentes el 8,5 %, convencionales el 48 %, seguimiento el 43 % y no valorables el 0,5 %. Se denegaron 494 (30 %): 20 % “contexto covid-19” y 80 % “contexto inadecuado”. Los motivos de denegacion en las gastroscopias fueron: seguimiento de lesiones (33 %), sintomas insuficientemente estudiados (20 %) y sintomas recidivantes con gastroscopia previa (18 %). Los motivos de denegacion en las colonoscopias fueron: vigilancia pospolipectomia (25 %), cancer colorrectal intervenido (21 %) y antecedentes familiares de cancer (13 %). Encontramos diferencias significativas en la denegacion segun la especialidad: Cirugia General (52 %), Hematologia (37 %) y Atencion Primaria (29 %). Un 31 % de las preferentes mostraron hallazgos relevantes. Conclusiones: un 24 % de nuestras endoscopias son discordantes con las recomendaciones cientificas. Su denegacion y la priorizacion de las adecuadas optimizan la utilizacion de recursos.

The intestinal spirochaetosis is defined as the presence of spirochetes on the colonic surface. We present the case of a 57-years-old male, with a history of 4-5 months of diffuse abdominal pain, watery diarrhoea due to this infection. The colonoscopy revealed a serpiginous ulcer in the cecum. The biopsy was positive for intestinal spirochaetosis. It is rare infection, more common among immunocompromised patients and HIV, with a faecal-oral transmission. Most cases are incidental findings in the endoscopic screening. In symptomatic patients the watery diarrhoea and non-specific abdominal pain are the most common symptoms. The macroscopic appearance on the colonoscopy is often normal or non-specific lesions can be identified. The diagnosis is based on the biopsy with haematoxylin and eosin and the confirmation can be made with a Warthin-Starry stain. In symptomatic patients the metronidazole is the preferred treatment option. Although it is rare infection, clinicians should be aware of it in patients with common gastrointestinal symptoms.

INTRODUCTION different endoscopic procedures have been proposed for the management of surgical leaks. Endoscopic internal drainage using trans-fistulary double-pigtail plastic stents has emerged as an alternative strategy, especially in fistulae presenting after laparoscopic gastric sleeve. METHODS a retrospective case series was performed at a single tertiary care center including all upper gastrointestinal post-surgical leaks primarily managed with endoscopic trans-fistulary insertion of double-pigtail plastic stents. Clinical success was defined as the absence of extravasation of oral radiographic contrast and radiological resolution of the collection with adequate oral intake Results: nine patients were included, six (66.6 %) females with a median age of 52.6 years (IQR 47-60). Five cases presented after laparoscopic gastric sleeve, two cases after distal esophagectomies, one after a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and another one after a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Fistulae measured < 10 mm in five patients (55.6 %) and 10-20 mm in four patients (44.4 %). Six were early leaks. Technical and clinical success was achieved in nine (100 %) and seven (77.8 %) cases, respectively. Seven (77.8 %) patients required ≤ 3 endoscopic procedures. The median hospital stay after the first endoscopic procedure was 12 days (IQR 6.5-17.5 days), while the overall median time until leak healing was 118.5 days (IQR 84.5-170). One patient with a post-esophagectomy intrathoracic leak developed an esophageal-tracheal fistula 37 days after stent deployment. CONCLUSIONS our results support the use of endoscopic internal drainage in postsurgical abdominal leaks, regardless of the type of surgery. Although only two patients with intrathoracic dehiscence were included.