Search

fifty to 70 percent of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are diagnosed incidentally. The objective of this study was to compare the phenotype and oncological outcomes of incidental versus symptomatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.a retrospective study was performed, identifying all incidental and symptomatic tumors resected between 2000 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, symptoms, operative variables and pathological stage were all recorded. Patterns of recurrence and overall and disease-free survival were analyzed in both groups.fifty-one incidental and 45 symptomatic pancreatic tumor resections were performed. Symptomatic tumors were more frequent in females (29 vs 17; p = 0.005) and younger patients (median years; 50 vs 58; p = 0.012) and were detected at a more advanced stage (p = 0.027). There were no differences in location and most resections (n = 49; 51 %) were performed laparoscopically. There were no operative mortalities and 17 (17.7 %) severe complications (≥ IIIb on the Clavien-Dindo classification) were recorded with no differences between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 64.4 months (range 13.5-90), overall survival at five and ten years was 89.7 % and 72.8 % for the non-incidental tumors and 80.9 % and 54.6 % for the incidental tumors (p = ns), respectively. Disease-free survival in both groups (excluding M1a) was 71.2 % and 47.5 %, and 93.7 % and 78.1 %, respectively (p = ns).symptomatic tumors are more frequent in females and present at more advanced pathological stages. There were no significant differences in overall and disease-free survival between the two groups. Resection of incidental tumors ≥ 1.5-2 cm seems advisable, although each case should be assessed on an individual basis.

Ampuero J et al. analyzed the relationship between liver injury and clinical progression of the disease in a meta-analysis of over 5,000 COVID-19 patients. The authors reported an association between increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and bilirubin levels with mortality, admission to Intensive Care and the development of complications, respectively.

Being able to predict preoperatively the difficulty of a cholecystectomy can increase safety and improve results. However, there is a need to reach a consensus on the definition of a cholecystectomy as "difficult". The aim of this study is to achieve a national expert consensus on this issue.A two-round Delphi study was performed. Based on the previous literature, history of biliary pathology, preoperative clinical, analytical, and radiological data, and intraoperative findings were selected as variables of interest and rated on a Likert scale. Inter-rater agreement was defined as "unanimous" when 100% of the participants gave an item the same rating on the Likert scale; as "consensus" when ≥80% agreed; as "majority" when the agreement was ≥70%. The delta of change between the two rounds was calculated.After the two rounds, the criteria that reached "consensus" were bile duct injury (96.77%), non-evident anatomy (93.55%), Mirizzi syndrome (93.55%), severe inflammation of Calot's triangle (90.32%), conversion to laparotomy (87.10%), time since last acute cholecystitis (83.87%), scleroatrophic gallbladder (80.65%) and pericholecystic abscess (80.65%).The ability to predict difficulty in cholecystectomy offers important advantages in terms of surgical safety. As a preliminary step, the items that define a surgical procedure as difficult should be established. Standardization of the criteria can provide scores to predict difficulty both preoperatively and intraoperatively, and thus allow the comparison of groups of similar difficulty.

COVID-19 is associated with severe coagulopathy. We present three cases of colonic ischemia that can be attributed to the hypercoagulable state related with SARS-CoV2 and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Three males aged 76, 68 and 56 with respiratory distress presented episodes of rectal bleeding, abdominal distension and signs of peritoneal irritation. Endoscopy (case 1) and computed tomography angiography revealed colonic ischemia. One patient (case 2) in which a computed tomography (CT) scan showed perforation of the gangrenous cecum underwent surgery. D-dimer levels were markedly increased (2,170, 2,100 and 7,360 ng/ml) in all three patients. All three patients died shortly after diagnosis.

Background Multivisceral resection (MVR) is sometimes necessary to achieve disease-free margins in cancer surgery. In certain patients with pancreatic tumors that invade neighboring organs these must be removed to perform an appropriate oncological surgery. In addition, there is an increasing need to perform resections of other organs like liver not directly invaded by the tumor but which require synchronous removal. The results of MVR in pancreatic surgery are controversial. Material and methods A distal pancreatectomy retrospective multicenter observational study using prospectively compiled data carried out at seven HPB Units. The period study was January 2008 to December 2018. We excluded DP with celiac trunk resection. Results 435 DP were performed. In 62 (14.25%) an extra organ was resected (82 organs). Comparison of the preoperative data of MVR and non-MVR patients showed that patients with MVR had lower BMI, higher ASA and larger tumor size. In the MVR group, the approach was mostly laparotomic and spleen preservation was performed only in 8% of the cases, Blood loss and the percentage of intraoperative transfusion were higher in MVR group. Major morbidity rates (Clavien > IIIa) and mortality (0.8vs.4.8%) were higher in the MVR group. Pancreatic fistula rates were practically the same in both groups. Mean hospital stay was twice as long in the MVR group and the readmission rate was higher in the MVR group. Histology study confirmed a much higher rate of malignant tumors in MVR group. Conclusions In order to obtain free margins or treat pathologies in several organs we think that DP + MVR is a feasible technique in selected patients; the results obtained are not as good as those of DP without MVR but are acceptable nonetheless. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04317352.

espanolIntroduccion: la trombosis portal (TP) es una complicacion relativamente frecuente de la cirrosis avanzada que aumenta el riesgo perioperatorio de los receptores de trasplante hepatico. La hemos caracterizado en una cohorte de pacientes, los factores de riesgo y su influencia sobre la supervivencia. Material y metodos: estudio retrospectivo de los receptores de trasplante hepatico en la Clinica Universidad de Navarra entre los anos 2000 y 2015. Se analizaron las diferencias clinicas y biologicas en sujetos con y sin trombosis portal, la supervivencia y el desarrollo de un indice predictivo. Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 288 pacientes. De ellos, se registro trombosis portal en 46 (16%), de los que siete (15,2%) presentaron estadios 3-4 de Yerdel. Se identificaron como factores asociados la presencia de varices esofagicas/gastricas (OR = 3,7; p = 0,03), la ligadura u escleroterapia de las mismas (OR = 2,3; p = 0,01), el sobrepeso/obesidad (OR = 2,1; p = 0,04) y la trombocitopenia (OR = 3,6; p = 0,04). En el analisis de supervivencia mediante curvas de Kaplan-Meier no se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos con y sin trombosis portal (p = 0,7), si bien la mortalidad fue superior en los estadios 3-4 de Yerdel (p EnglishIntroduction: portal vein thrombosis is a relatively common complication of advanced cirrhosis that increases perioperative risk in liver transplant recipients. This condition was characterized in a cohort of patients, including risk factors and their influence on survival. Material and methods: a retrospective study of liver transplant recipients at the Clinica Universidad de Navarra was performed between 2000 and 2015. Differences in clinical and biological characteristics and survival were analyzed in subjects with and without portal vein thrombosis. A predictive index was also developed. Results: a total of 288 patients were included in the study, portal vein thrombosis was recorded in 46 (16%) cases and seven (15.2%) had stage 3/4 disease according to Yerdel’s classification. Factors associated with the presence of esophageal/gastric varices (OR = 3.7; p = 0.03) included variceal ligation or sclerotherapy (OR = 2.3; p = 0.01), being overweight/obesity (OR = 2.1; p = 0.04) and thrombocytopenia (OR = 3.6; p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the groups with and without portal vein thrombosis in terms of survival according to Kaplan-Meier curve analysis (p = 0.7). However, the mortality rate was higher for Yerdel stages 3-4 (p