Search

Objectives Monitoring quality indicators (QIs) is an important part of laboratory quality assurance (QA). Here, the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists (CSCC) Point of Care Testing (POCT) and QI Special Interest Groups describe a process for establishing and monitoring QIs for POCT glucose testing. Methods Key, error prone steps in the POCT glucose testing process were collaboratively mapped out, followed by risk assessment for each step. Steps with the highest risk and ability to detect a non-conformance were chosen for follow-up. These were positive patient identification (PPID) and repeat of critically high glucose measurements. Participating sites were asked to submit aggregate data for these indicators from their site(s) for a one-month period. The PPID QI was also included as part of a national QI monitoring program for which fifty-seven sites submitted data. Results The percentage of POCT glucose tests performed without valid PPID ranged from 0–87%. Sites without Admission-Discharge-Transfer (ADT) connectivity to POCT meters were among those with the highest percentage of POCT glucose tests performed without valid PPID. The percentage repeated critically high glucose measurements ranged from 0–50%, indicating low compliance with this recommendation. A high rate of discordance was also noted when critically high POCT glucose measurements were repeated, demonstrating the importance of repeat testing prior to insulin administration. Conclusions Here, a process for establishing these QIs is described, with preliminary data for two QIs chosen from this process. The findings demonstrate the importance of QIs for identification and comparative performance monitoring of non-conformances to improve POCT quality.

Introduction The type of blood collection tube used when obtaining samples for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has important implications on the accuracy of results. Serum tubes without a gel separator are currently considered best practice. We sought to evaluate the performance of of Barricor™, a novel plasma tube that utilizes an inert mechanical separator, as well as a gel-based tube (PST™) for testing acetaminophen, digoxin, gentamicin, methotrexate, phenobarbital, phenytoin, salicylate, vancomycin, valproic acid, carbamazepine, and theophylline on a Roche Cobas® 8000 platform. Methods Paired patient samples were collected from individuals taking at least one of the medications evaluated. These were supplemented with spiked specimens to ensure a minimum of 40 paired samples per drug. All drugs were measured within two hours of collection on Roche e602 or c502 instruments. Deming regression was used to assess bias between Barricor™ vs serum and PST™ vs serum. Seven-day refrigerated stability was also assessed in Barricor™, PST™, and serum tubes in a subset of samples (n=10) for each drug. Results Drug concentrations in Barricor™ were similar to serum for each drug assessed. In contrast, a negative bias was observed in PST™ compared to serum tubes for carbamazepine (-7.6%) and phenytoin (-6.8%) although this did not surpass our total allowable error goal of 10%. All drugs recovered within ±10% of baseline value when samples were stored refrigerated for 7 days except for carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital where significant analyte loss was observed within the first day in PST™ tubes. Conclusion Barricor™ tubes are a suitable alternative to serum for TDM on the Roche Cobas® 8000 platform.

Point of Care Testing (POCT) refers to clinical laboratory testing performed outside the central laboratory, nearer to the patient and sometimes at the patient bedside. The testing is usually performed by clinical staff, such as physicians or nurses, who are not laboratory trained. This document was developed by the POCT Interest group of the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists (CSCC) as practical guidance for quality assurance practices related to POCT performed in hospital and outside hospital environments. The aspects of quality assurance addressed in this document include: (1) device selection, (2) initial device verification, (3) ongoing device verification, (4) ongoing quality assurance including reagent and quality control (QC) lot changes, and (5) quality management including operator and document management.

Barricor™ Vacutainers® are a novel non-gel separator blood collection tube. These tubes enable faster pre-analytical processing which could reduce turnaround time and be beneficial in an acute care setting. We sought to evaluate the bias, stability, and integrity of plasma generated from these tubes compared to Plasma Separator Tubes™ (PST) for 50 routine chemistry analytes on a Roche Cobas® 8000 analyzer.Paired samples were collected from 150 patients originating in the emergency department and outpatient collections at the Saint John Regional Hospital. Barricor™ vacutainers were centrifuged for 3 min at 4000g and PST™ vacutainers for 10 min at 1300 g within two hours of collection. Plasma samples (n = 126) were then analyzed for 50 chemistry analytes and bias determined between tubes. Ten-day stability of AST, glucose, potassium, phosphate, and LDH was also assessed in a subset of paired samples (n = 4). Lastly, the quality of plasma (n = 20) was assessed through measurement of cell counts on a DxH Hematology Analyzer.All 50 analytes demonstrated comparable results across a broad concentration range between Barricor™ and PST™ vacutainers (average percent bias -1.5% to 6.1%; Deming linear regression slopes 0.933-1.041; correlation coefficients ≥ 0.9144). AST, potassium, glucose and LDH were stable for 10 days in Barricor™ vacutainers (change from baseline 10%) but5 days in PST™ vacutainers while phosphate was stable for 4 days in Barricor™ vs 2 days in PST™ vacutainers. Platelet counts were statistically lower in Barricor™ compared to PST™ vacutainers.Our data suggest that Barricor™ vacutainers are an acceptable alternative to PST™ vacutainers while offering the added benefit of decreased pre-analytical processing time, increased stability of certain analytes, and possibly less cellular contamination.

Studies have demonstrated improved analytical performance of the Nova StatStrip glucose meter, but limited data is available on its clinical performance in critically ill neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).A retrospective charge review was conducted on 651 neonates admitted to the NICU over 2 years. Demographics, sample collection information, and clinical details were recorded. Glucose measurements were performed at the bedside using either the Nova StraStrip or LifeScan SureStep Flexx meters as well as corresponding measurements of laboratory venous plasma glucose. Performance was analyzed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for detecting hypoglycemia and critical glucose levels.Linear regression analysis comparing StatStrip and laboratory venous plasma glucose samples demonstrated significantly tighter agreement (r(2)=0.7994) and accuracy (mean bias=0.13mmol/L) than SureStep (r(2)=0.6845 and mean bias=0.53mmol/L). StatStrip also showed improved sensitivity for detecting critical low glucose values ≤3.0mmol/L (80.9 vs 68.9%, p0.05). ROC curve analysis further demonstrated excellent performance of StatStrip at this cutoff with an AUC of 0.98. Overall, neonates were also tested significantly less frequently with the StatStrip meter by 24% compared to SureStep.Implementation of StatStrip led to better agreement with venous plasma glucose, improved detection of critical low glucose results, and more efficient test utilization. This study demonstrates the importance of accurate and sensitive glucose monitoring in the NICU.

Levamisole is an anthelminthic that was first used as a de-worming agent in humans and animals. It has also been used to treat inflammatory conditions as well as certain types of cancer. Levamisole was discontinued for human use in the early 21st century due to toxic side effects including agranulocytosis and vasculitis. Recently, levamisole was discovered as a cocaine adulterant after reports emerged of drug users with the above disorders. As the prevalence of cocaine usage has grown in the last 15 years, measurement of levamisole in human samples has become increasingly important. This review focuses on the various bioanalytical methods available for the determination of levamisole in human plasma and urine. Earlier methods employed gas chromatography coupled with nitrogen-selective thermionic specific detection and nitrogen-phosphorus detection, as well as high performance liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet detection. In addition, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have also been described. Currently, GC-MS appears to be the method of choice however recent developments in the area of LC-MS/MS make this technology an attractive alternative. The merits of both GC-MS and LC-MS/MS for the determination of levamisole are evaluated on the basis of sample preparation, chromatographic separation conditions, run time, and analytical performance. In addition, emerging methods in this area are also reviewed.