Search

Advance care planning (ACP) is a critical component of end-of-life (EoL) care, yet infrequently taught in medical training.We designed a novel curriculum that affords third-year medical students (MS3s) the opportunity to practice EoL care discussions with a trained older adult in the patient's home.Volunteers were instructed as trained patients (TPs) to evaluate MS3s interviewing and communication skills. The MS3s received a didactic lecture and supplemental material about ACP. Pairs of MS3s conducted ACP interviews with TPs who gave verbal and written feedback to students. Student evaluations included reflective essays and pre/postsurveys in ACP skills.A total of 223 US MS3s participated in the curriculum.Qualitative analysis of reflective essays revealed 4 themes: (1) students' personal feelings, attitudes, and observations about conducting ACP interviews; (2) observations about the process of relationship building; (3) learning about and respecting patients' values and choices; and (4) the importance of practicing the ACP skills in medical school. Students' confidence in skills significantly improved in all 7 domains ( P.001): (1) introduce subject of EoL; (2) define advance directives; (3) assess values, goals, and priorities; (4) discuss prior experience with death; (5) assess expectations about treatment and hospitalization; (6) explain cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes; and (7) deal with own feelings about EoL and providers' limitations.The use of older adults as TPs in an ACP curriculum provides students an opportunity to practice skills and receive feedback in the nonmedical setting, thereby improving comfort and confidence in approaching these conversations for future patients.

This standardized patient case and its accompanying sequence of activities are intended to build skill among first-year medical students in recognizing patient clues and eliciting contextual information. Additional activities include a large-group introduction prior to the standardized patient encounter, a stimulated review of the standardized patient encounter, and a small-group reflection and discussion. The standardized patient case embeds three contextual themes (beliefs about treatment, stressful environment, and fear of what symptoms mean) that are each assigned a specific behavioral cue or clue. Standardized patients are trained to drop these clues and then to give further information only if the student interviewer follows up on the clue. Each theme is constructed to yield potentially meaningful differences in physician decision-making if the clue is or is not followed up on. Students and standardized patients then review the video independently and mark moments in the video that they feel represented clues and whether or not the clue was followed up on. Once the moments have been marked, the students view the video a second time to compare their own markings with those of the standardized patient. Lastly, the students meet in small groups with a faculty facilitator to share one exemplar moment and discuss with the group. Students indicated that the stimulated recall video review of their standardized patient encounter was the most effective activity for triggering reflection, followed by the small-group discussion and the review of the merged standardized patient bookmarks. Students felt that the activities were effective overall in promoting reflection on the relevance of context in the medical encounter.