Search

Le traitement du cancer du sein modifie les taux d’œstrogène et entraîne une importante perte osseuse, de l’ostéoporose et des risques de fracture. Bien qu’il existe des lignes directrices sur les soins des os soient, les personnes à risque ne bénéficient pas systématiquement des interventions en ce sens. Le présent article fait état du processus de conception et de mise en œuvre d’un Programme Santé seins et os (PSSO) bilingue et dirigé par des infirmières, offert en personne et en ligne dans un centre de cancérologie de Montréal, dans la province de Québec (https://santeseinsetos.ca/). Le PSSO propose des interventions personnalisées pour préserver la santé des os : évaluation des risques, information sur la réadaptation, prescription d’exercices, conseils nutritionnels et accompagnement pour l’adoption d’un mode de vie sain. Pendant 2 ans, des femmes traitées pour un cancer du sein (N = 430) ont pris part au programme. De ce nombre, 40 % (n = 97) ont dit au départ ignorer que certains traitements anticancéreux pouvaient fragiliser considérablement les os. À la suite de la première séance d’information avec l’infirmière responsable du PSSO, leurs connaissances autoévaluées à ce sujet se sont grandement améliorées, et 96 % ont dit en savoir suffisamment pour gérer leur santé osseuse. Le PSSO a été créé à l’intention des professionnels de la santé et des femmes atteintes de cancer du sein. Il offre une évaluation du risque en ligne et en personne ainsi que des activités et des outils visant à promouvoir la bonne santé des os. Le présent article décrit le contexte ayant mené à l’élaboration et à la mise en œuvre du PSSO, de même que l’évaluation préliminaire du programme.

Breast cancer treatment can affect estrogen levels leading to significant bone loss, osteoporosis, and risks for fracture. Although bone care guidelines are published, bone health interventions are often not routinely offered to at-risk individuals. This paper reports on the process of developing and implementing a nurse-led bilingual Breast and Bone Health Program (BBHP) in-person and online at a cancer centre in Montreal, Quebec (www.breastandbonehealth.ca, www.santeseinsetos.ca). The BBHP offers tailored bone health interventions (e.g., risk screening, information, rehabilitation, exercise prescriptions, nutritional counselling, and support for a health-promoting lifestyle). Over a two-year period, women treated for breast cancer (N = 430) took part in the program. Forty percent of surveyed participants (n = 97) initally reported being unaware that some breast cancer treatment could significantly affect bone health. Following the initial informational session with the BBHP nurse, self-reported bone health knowledge significantly increased, with 96% reporting sufficient information to manage their bone health. The BBHP offers both online and in-person risk assessment and bone health promotion activities and tools to both health care professionals and women with breast cancer. Herein, we review the background, BBHP development and implementation as well as preliminary program evaluation.

Summary Background Clinical services for Barrett’s esophagus have been rising worldwide including Australia, but little is known of the long-term outcomes of such patients. Retrospective studies using data at baseline are prone to both selection and misclassification bias. We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Barrett’s esophagus patients in a prospective cohort. Methods We recruited patients diagnosed with Barrett’s esophagus in tertiary settings across Australia between 2008 and 2016. We compared baseline and follow-up epidemiological and clinical data between Barrett’s patients with and without dysplasia. We calculated age-adjusted incidence rates and estimated minimally and fully adjusted hazard ratios (HR) to identify those clinical factors related to disease progression. Results The cohort comprised 268 patients with Barrett’s esophagus (median follow-up 5 years). At recruitment, 224 (84%) had no dysplasia, 44 (16%) had low-grade or indefinite dysplasia (LGD/IND). The age-adjusted incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) was 0.5% per year in LGD/IND compared with 0.1% per year in those with no dysplasia. Risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia/EAC was associated with prior LGD/IND (fully adjusted HR 6.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.96–21.8) but not long-segment disease (HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.29–3.58). Conclusions These prospective data suggest presence of dysplasia is a stronger predictor of progression to cancer than segment length in patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

Background: Specialist palliative care services have various configurations of staff, processes and interventions, which determine how care is delivered. Currently, there is no consistent way to define and distinguish these different models of care. Aim: To identify the core components that characterise and differentiate existing models of specialist palliative care in the United Kingdom. Design: Mixed-methods study: (1) semi-structured interviews to identify criteria, (2) two-round Delphi study to rank/refine criteria, and (3) structured interviews to test/refine criteria. Setting/participants: Specialist palliative care stakeholders from hospice inpatient, hospital advisory, and community settings. Results: (1) Semi-structured interviews with 14 clinical leads, from eight UK organisations (five hospice inpatient units, two hospital advisory teams, five community teams), provided 34 preliminary criteria. (2) Delphi study: Round 1 (54 participants): thirty-four criteria presented, seven removed and seven added. Round 2 (30 participants): these 34 criteria were ranked with the 15 highest ranked criteria, including setting, type of care, size of service, diagnoses, disciplines, mode of care, types of interventions, ‘out-of-hours’ components (referrals, times, disciplines, mode of care, type of care), external education, use of measures, bereavement follow-up and complex grief provision. (3) Structured interviews with 21 UK service leads (six hospice inpatients, four hospital advisory and nine community teams) refined the criteria from (1) and (2), and provided four further contextual criteria (team purpose, funding, self-referral acceptance and discharge). Conclusion: In this innovative study, we derive 20 criteria to characterise and differentiate models of specialist palliative care – a major paradigm shift to enable accurate reporting and comparison in practice and research.

IntroductionProvision of palliative care is inequitable with wide variations across conditions and settings in the UK. Lack of a standard way to classify by case complexity is one of the principle obstacles to addressing this. We aim to develop and validate a casemix classification to support the prediction of costs of specialist palliative care provision.Methods and analysisPhase I: A cohort study to determine the variables and potential classes to be included in a casemix classification. Data are collected from clinicians in palliative care services across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings on: patient demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. Cost predictors are derived using multivariate regression and then incorporated into a classification using classification and regression trees. Internal validation will be conducted by bootstrapping to quantify any optimism in the predictive performance (calibration and discrimination) of the developed classification. Phase II: A mixed-methods cohort study across settings for external validation of the classification developed in phase I. Patient and family caregiver data will be collected longitudinally on demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. This will be triangulated with data collected from clinicians on potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use, and with qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers about care provision across difference settings. The classification will be refined on the basis of its performance in the validation data set.Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee. The results are expected to be disseminated in 2018 through papers for publication in major palliative care journals; policy briefs for clinicians, commissioning leads and policy makers; and lay summaries for patients and public.Trial registration numberISRCTN90752212.

Background Family caregivers suffer physically, mentally, and spiritually. Community volunteers play an important role in supporting patients at the end of life or former caregivers in bereavement. However, there are no research reports of volunteer services focused on maintaining the wellbeing of end-of-life caregivers. Aim To have volunteers, a hired volunteer coordinator, health care providers, and researchers implement and formatively evaluate a volunteer service to enable family caregivers to maintain their well being while providing care and subsequent bereavement. This presentation will focus on the volunteers’ roles with the project as both agents of change to the service and as support for the caregivers. Method A qualitative formative evaluation informed by Guba and Lincoln’s Fourth Generation Evaluation (1989) participatory design was conducted. Data was collected through individual interviews, focus groups, participant observation during volunteer support meetings, and through volunteers’ written reflections. Results Amongst the volunteers, volunteer coordinator, and principal investigator, there was mutual respect for and interest in learning about everyone’s roles and experiences in the project. The experience was rewarding because they felt they helped the family caregiver and enjoyed developing and improving the service and working in a supportive team. Volunteers’ challenges included being nervous for their first meeting with a caregiver, and frustration with some rules put in place to protect them (e.g. not helping the caregiver with direct care for the patient). Conclusion Volunteers can be an effective part of the research team, while providing valuable support and encouragement for family caregivers to maintain their own wellbeing.