Search

While several comparative studies have analyzed the effectiveness of various large language models (LLMs), most of them were technical (i.e., comparing execution time, among others). Additionally, these comparative studies did not discuss special education. Consequently, scant information exists about how effective LLMs are in special education. To address this research gap, this study conducted a comparative study of three LLMs, namely GPT-4o, Gemini, and Ernie, as gloss sign language translators for learners with hearing impairments. Specifically, a mixed method was adopted, where the translated outputs of the three LLMs were compared (quantitatively and qualitatively) to two sign language outputs from a sign language expert. The obtained results highlighted that Gemini outperformed both GPT-4o and Ernie as an accurate gloss sign language translator. Additionally, GPT-4o had a high accurate rate, while Ernie had a very low translation performance. The findings of this study can help to raise awareness about the use of LLMs in special education as well as the best ones to use especially with hearing impairment learners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background context: Clinical guidelines, developed in concordance with the literature, are often used to guide surgeons' clinical decision making. Recent advancements of large language models and artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field come with exciting potential. OpenAI's generative AI model, known as ChatGPT, can quickly synthesize information and generate responses grounded in medical literature, which may prove to be a useful tool in clinical decision-making for spine care. The current literature has yet to investigate the ability of ChatGPT to assist clinical decision making with regard to degenerative spondylolisthesis. Purpose: The study aimed to compare ChatGPT's concordance with the recommendations set forth by The North American Spine Society (NASS) Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and assess ChatGPT's accuracy within the context of the most recent literature. Methods: ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 was prompted with questions from the NASS Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and graded its recommendations as "concordant" or "nonconcordant" relative to those put forth by NASS. A response was considered "concordant" when ChatGPT generated a recommendation that accurately reproduced all major points made in the NASS recommendation. Any responses with a grading of "nonconcordant" were further stratified into two subcategories: "Insufficient" or "Over-conclusive," to provide further insight into grading rationale. Responses between GPT-3.5 and 4.0 were compared using Chi-squared tests. Results: ChatGPT-3.5 answered 13 of NASS's 28 total clinical questions in concordance with NASS's guidelines (46.4%). Categorical breakdown is as follows: Definitions and Natural History (1/1, 100%), Diagnosis and Imaging (1/4, 25%), Outcome Measures for Medical Intervention and Surgical Treatment (0/1, 0%), Medical and Interventional Treatment (4/6, 66.7%), Surgical Treatment (7/14, 50%), and Value of Spine Care (0/2, 0%). When NASS indicated there was sufficient evidence to offer a clear recommendation, ChatGPT-3.5 generated a concordant response 66.7% of the time (6/9). However, ChatGPT-3.5's concordance dropped to 36.8% when asked clinical questions that NASS did not provide a clear recommendation on (7/19). A further breakdown of ChatGPT-3.5's nonconcordance with the guidelines revealed that a vast majority of its inaccurate recommendations were due to them being "over-conclusive" (12/15, 80%), rather than "insufficient" (3/15, 20%). ChatGPT-4.0 answered 19 (67.9%) of the 28 total questions in concordance with NASS guidelines (P = 0.177). When NASS indicated there was sufficient evidence to offer a clear recommendation, ChatGPT-4.0 generated a concordant response 66.7% of the time (6/9). ChatGPT-4.0's concordance held up at 68.4% when asked clinical questions that NASS did not provide a clear recommendation on (13/19, P = 0.104). Conclusions: This study sheds light on the duality of LLM applications within clinical settings: one of accuracy and utility in some contexts versus inaccuracy and risk in others. ChatGPT was concordant for most clinical questions NASS offered recommendations for. However, for questions NASS did not offer best practices, ChatGPT generated answers that were either too general or inconsistent with the literature, and even fabricated data/citations. Thus, clinicians should exercise extreme caution when attempting to consult ChatGPT for clinical recommendations, taking care to ensure its reliability within the context of recent literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The identification of optimal candidate genes from large-scale blood transcriptomic data is crucial for developing targeted assays to monitor immune responses. Here, we introduce a novel, optimized large language model (LLM)-based approach for prioritizing candidate biomarkers from blood transcriptional modules. Focusing on module M14.51 from the BloodGen3 repertoire, we implemented a multi-step LLM-driven workflow. Initial high-throughput screening used GPT-4, Claude 3, and Claude 3.5 Sonnet to score and rank the module's constituent genes across six criteria. Top candidates then underwent high-resolution scoring using Consensus GPT, with concurrent manual fact-checking and, when needed, iterative refinement of the scores based on user feedback. Qualitative assessment of literature-based narratives and analysis of reference transcriptome data further refined the selection process. This novel multi-tiered approach consistently identified Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) as the top candidate gene for module M14.51. GPX4's role in oxidative stress regulation, its potential as a future drug target, and its expression pattern across diverse cell types supported its selection. The incorporation of reference transcriptome data further validated GPX4 as the most suitable candidate for this module. This study presents an advanced LLM-driven workflow with a novel optimized scoring strategy for candidate gene prioritization, incorporating human-in-the-loop augmentation. The approach identified GPX4 as a key gene in the erythroid cell-associated module M14.51, suggesting its potential utility for biomarker discovery and targeted assay development. By combining AI-driven literature analysis with iterative human expert validation, this method leverages the strengths of both artificial and human intelligence, potentially contributing to the development of biologically relevant and clinically informative targeted assays. Further validation studies are needed to confirm the broader applicability of this human-augmented AI approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper proposes a framework that combines behavioral and computational experiments employing fictional prompts as a novel tool for investigating cultural artifacts and social biases in storytelling both by humans and generative AI. The study analyzes 250 stories authored by crowdworkers in June 2019 and 80 stories generated by GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in March 2023 by merging methods from narratology and inferential statistics. Both crowdworkers and large language models responded to identical prompts about creating and falling in love with an artificial human. The proposed experimental paradigm allows a direct and controlled comparison between human and LLM-generated storytelling. Responses to the Pygmalionesque prompts confirm the pervasive presence of the Pygmalion myth in the collective imaginary of both humans and large language models. All solicited narratives present a scientific or technological pursuit. The analysis reveals that narratives from GPT-3.5 and particularly GPT-4 are more progressive in terms of gender roles and sexuality than those written by humans. While AI narratives with default settings and no additional prompting can occasionally provide innovative plot twists, they offer less imaginative scenarios and rhetoric than human-authored texts. The proposed framework argues that fiction can be used as a window into human and AI-based collective imaginary and social dimensions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The digital transformation of modern cities by integrating advanced information, communication, and computing technologies has marked the epoch of data-driven smart city applications for efficient and sustainable urban management. Despite their effectiveness, these applications often rely on massive amounts of high-dimensional and multi-domain data for monitoring and characterizing different urban sub-systems, presenting challenges in application areas that are limited by data quality and availability, as well as costly efforts for generating urban scenarios and design alternatives. As an emerging research area in deep learning, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) models have demonstrated their unique values in content generation. This paper aims to explore the innovative integration of GenAI techniques and urban digital twins to address challenges in the planning and management of built environments with focuses on various urban sub-systems, such as transportation, energy, water, and building and infrastructure. The survey starts with the introduction of cutting-edge generative AI models, such as the Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT), followed by a scoping review of the existing urban science applications that leverage the intelligent and autonomous capability of these techniques to facilitate the research, operations, and management of critical urban subsystems, as well as the holistic planning and design of the built environment. Based on the review, we discuss potential opportunities and technical strategies that integrate GenAI models into the next-generation urban digital twins for more intelligent, scalable, and automated smart city development and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This preliminary study explores how GPT-4 Vision (GPT-4V) technology can be integrated into teacher analytics through observational assessment, aiming to improve reflective teaching practice. Our study develops a Video-based Automatic Assessment System (VidAAS) powered by GPT-4V. This approach uses Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) to provide detailed insights into classroom dynamics. Our study encompasses various methods with multiple steps: a comprehensive literature review, prototype development of the VidAAS, and usability testing with in-service teachers. The study findings reveal that VidAAS demonstrates high accuracy in evaluating skills in the behavioral (psychomotor) domain and offers comprehensive explanations for each assessment. While showing promise in these areas, the system also indicates potential for further enhancement in processing speed and refinement in assessing cognitive and affective domains. We discuss how VidAAS supports teachers' reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action, emphasizing the need to balance AI-driven insights and human judgment. Our study findings also guide future research avenues for VidAAS design, implementation, and integration in teacher analytics, underscoring GPT-4V's potential for real-time, scalable feedback and a deeper classroom understanding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Genetic data play a crucial role in diagnosing and treating various diseases, reflecting a growing imperative to integrate these data into clinical care. However, significant barriers such as the structure of electronic health records (EHRs), insurance costs for genetic testing, and the interpretability of genetic results impede this integration. Methods: This paper explores solutions to these challenges by combining recent technological advances with informatics and data science, focusing on the diagnostic potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in cancer research. AI has historically been applied in medical research with limited success, but recent developments have led to the emergence of large language models (LLMs). These transformer-based generative AI models, trained on vast datasets, offer significant potential for genetic and genomic analyses. However, their effectiveness is constrained by their training on predominantly human-written text rather than comprehensive, structured genetic datasets. Results: This study reevaluates the capabilities of LLMs, specifically GPT models, in performing supervised prediction tasks using structured gene expression data. By comparing GPT models with traditional machine learning approaches, we assess their effectiveness in predicting cancer subtypes, demonstrating the potential of AI models to analyze real-world genetic data for generating real-world evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: While the global medical graduate and student population is approximately 50% female, only 13–15% of cardiologists and 20–27% of training fellows in cardiology are female. The potentially transformative use of text-to-image generative artificial intelligence (AI) could improve promotions and professional perceptions. In particular, DALL-E 3 offers a useful tool for promotion and education, but it could reinforce gender and ethnicity biases. Method: Responding to pre-specified prompts, DALL-E 3 via GPT-4 generated a series of individual and group images of cardiologists. Overall, 44 images were produced, including 32 images that contained individual characters and 12 group images that contained between 7 and 17 characters. All images were independently analysed by three reviewers for the characters' apparent genders, ages, and skin tones. Results: Among all images combined, 86% (N = 123) of cardiologists were depicted as male. A light skin tone was observed in 93% (N = 133) of cardiologists. The gender distribution was not statistically different from that of actual Australian workforce data (p = 0.7342), but this represents a DALL-E 3 gender bias and the under-representation of females in the cardiology workforce. Conclusions: Gender bias associated with text-to-image generative AI when using DALL-E 3 among cardiologists limits its usefulness for promotion and education in addressing the workforce gender disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) shows promise in automating key tasks involved in conducting systematic literature reviews (SLRs), including screening, bias assessment and data extraction. This potential automation is increasingly relevant as pharmaceutical developers face challenging requirements for timely and precise SLRs using the population, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICO) framework, such as those under the impending European Union (EU) Health Technology Assessment Regulation 2021/2282 (HTAR). This proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy and efficiency of using GenAI for mass extraction of PICOs from PubMed abstracts. Methods: Abstracts were retrieved from PubMed using a search string targeting randomised controlled trials. A PubMed clinical study 'specific/narrow' filter was also applied. Retrieved abstracts were processed using the OpenAI Batch application programming interface (API), which allowed parallel processing and interaction with Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 Omni (GPT-4o) via custom Python scripts. PICO elements were extracted using a zero-shot prompting strategy. Results were stored in CSV files and subsequently imported into a PostgreSQL database. Results: The PubMed search returned 682,667 abstracts. PICOs from all abstracts were extracted in < 3 h, with an average processing time of 200 s per 1000 abstracts. A total of 395,992,770 tokens were processed, with an average of 580 tokens per abstract. The total cost was $3390. On the basis of a random sample of 350 abstracts, human verification confirmed that GPT-4o accurately and comprehensively extracted 342 (98%) of all PICOs, with only outcome elements rarely missed. Conclusions: Using GenAI to extract PICOs from clinical study abstracts could fundamentally transform the way SLRs are conducted. By enabling pharmaceutical developers to anticipate PICO requirements, this approach allows for proactive preparation for the EU HTAR process, or other health technology assessments (HTAs), streamlining efficiency and reducing the burden of meeting these requirements. Plain Language Summary: This study explored how artificial intelligence (AI) can help automate a key part of systematic literature reviews (SLRs), which are used to summarise research in healthcare. AI was used to extract specific information referred to as population, intervention, comparator and outcome (PICOs) from nearly 700,000 abstracts of clinical studies from the PubMed database. AI extracted the PICO information from all the abstracts in under 3 h, which is significantly faster than a human could do. This demonstrates that AI could save a lot of time and effort compared with using human reviewers to do the same task. The study also found that AI performed accurately in identifying the PICO elements in the abstracts, although further human verification is still required. The use of AI in this way could help pharmaceutical developers meet upcoming requirements from the European Union, which require timely and thorough reviews of clinical evidence. AI can speed up the process, reducing the burden on pharmaceutical developers and allowing them to prepare more efficiently for these assessments. However, further testing and validation is needed before using AI in this way becomes common. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explores the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on labor and challenges the notion that AI is eliminating human jobs. Instead, the author argues that AI is being used by employers to degrade labor by transforming good jobs into bad ones and hiding human labor behind technology. The article explains that AI is not a specific technology but rather a desire to create intelligent machines. It discusses the use of machine learning and artificial neural networks in AI and how employers are using them to control and degrade work. The author emphasizes the importance of labor unions understanding these changes and negotiating terms in the present rather than speculating about future effects. The article concludes by highlighting the historical pattern of employers using technology to degrade jobs and the likelihood that machine learning will continue to contribute to this process. The impact of AI on workers is also discussed, including the potential for increased productivity but also faster work and the deskilling of tasks. Unions have historically faced challenges in negotiating the use of technology, but recent successes have focused on protecting workers' rights and compensation in the face of AI. The article also provides examples of how AI can be used to obscure poorly paid human labor, such as manual processing of customer receipts in India for Amazon. The discourse around automation, which emerged after World War II, promoted the idea of a future without human labor, but in reality, automation often led to degraded and accelerated work. The article emphasizes the need for workers to challenge the narrative of technological progress and have a voice in the implementation of AI in the workplace [Extracted from the article]

This article explores the ethical concerns surrounding the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) for qualitative data analysis. The authors raise issues related to data ownership, privacy, biases, and the responsibilities of researchers. They argue that relying solely on automated systems for data analysis can lead to biased and incomplete results, and stress the importance of human insight and understanding in research, particularly in areas of marginalization and oppression. The article calls for the development of ethical guidelines to address these concerns and ensure the integrity of qualitative data analysis using GAI. [Extracted from the article]

The efficiency of information retrieval systems primarily depends on the effective representation of documents during query processing. This representation is mainly constructed from relevant document terms identified and selected during their indexing, which are then used for retrieval. However, when documents contain only a few features, such as in short documents, the resulting representation may be information-poor due to a lack of index terms and their lack of relevance. Although document representation can be enriched using techniques like word embeddings, these techniques require large pre-trained datasets, which are often unavailable in the context of domain-specific short documents. This study investigates a new approach to enrich document representation during indexing using generative AI. In the proposed approach, relevant terms extracted from documents and preprocessed for indexing are enriched with a list of key terms suggested by a large language model (LLM). After conducting a small benchmark of several renowned LLM models for key term suggestions from a set of short texts, the GPT-4o model was chosen to experiment with the proposed indexing approach. The findings of this study yielded notable results, demonstrating that generative AI can efficiently fill the knowledge gap in document representation, regardless of the retrieval technique used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new era in Generative Artificial Intelligence has begun with the release of powerful Large Language Models (LLMs). These models have shown significant potential in marketing. Essentially, they have been redefining sales practices and changing sales funnel steps. Despite their promise and persuasive capabilities, there remains a dearth of comprehensive understanding regarding the capabilities of LLMs in generating sales arguments, which is a task traditionally characterized by high costs, time consumption, subjective biases, and the need for considerable expertise and skills. In this study, we take the first step towards exploring the ability of LLMs to generate sales arguments. To this end, we evaluated GPT-4 as one of the most capable LLMs to date in performing zero-shot sales argument creation from product features. We created a dataset containing textual descriptions of features extracted from brochures, catalogs, and technical data sheets of various products of a global company specializing in the manufacturing and retailing of furniture, appliances, and home accessories. We conducted a human evaluation with five experts, covering three main criteria of argument quality, namely coherence, persuasiveness, and relevance. The experimental results revealed the remarkable ability of GPT-4 to generate high-quality and well-structured sales arguments according to the Feature-Advantage-Benefit method. Over 98% of the evaluated arguments were coherent and persuasive. Regarding relevance, the model exhibited an accuracy of 91.53% to align the generated arguments to customers' purchase motives, namely security, vanity, novelty, comfort, money, and likability. These findings could lead to significant time and cost reductions, allowing the sales force to focus on higher-value tasks. We posit that this study heralds a novel avenue for exploring LLMs' capabilities in other steps of the sales funnel process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unbelievable progress in creating real-looking texts, audios and videos, numerous product designs and templates using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-enabled technologies have made work easier. However, they have their possible ill-effects too. Since the fruition of regulatory framework trails technological evolution, the future can see a virus-antivirus kind of ecosystem, where one set of GenAI tools will create contents that look most authentic and evade plagiarism and the other set will be busy trapping those. This study delves deep into the working of GenAI, various industry use cases, risk paradigms, and how organizations can start adopting the same, as it may be impossible to deny GenAI's business benefits for long. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence (AI) models can generate scientific abstracts that are difficult to distinguish from the work of human authors. The use of AI in scientific writing and performance of AI detection tools are poorly characterized. METHODS: We extracted text from published scientific abstracts from the ASCO 2021-2023 Annual Meetings. Likelihood of AI content was evaluated by three detectors: GPTZero, Originality.ai, and Sapling. Optimal thresholds for AI content detection were selected using 100 abstracts from before 2020 as negative controls, and 100 produced by OpenAI's GPT-3 and GPT-4 models as positive controls. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of predicted AI content with submission year and abstract characteristics, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were computed. RESULTS: Fifteen thousand five hundred and fifty-three abstracts met inclusion criteria. Across detectors, abstracts submitted in 2023 were significantly more likely to contain AI content than those in 2021 (aOR range from 1.79 with Originality to 2.37 with Sapling). Online-only publication and lack of clinical trial number were consistently associated with AI content. With optimal thresholds, 99.5%, 96%, and 97% of GPT-3/4–generated abstracts were identified by GPTZero, Originality, and Sapling respectively, and no sampled abstracts from before 2020 were classified as AI generated by the GPTZero and Originality detectors. Correlation between detectors was low to moderate, with Spearman correlation coefficient ranging from 0.14 for Originality and Sapling to 0.47 for Sapling and GPTZero. CONCLUSION: There is an increasing signal of AI content in ASCO abstracts, coinciding with the growing popularity of generative AI models. Analysis of 15,553 ASCO meeting abstracts with 3 AI detectors suggests rise in AI content in 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How good a research scientist is ChatGPT? We systematically probed the capabilities of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 across four central components of the scientific process: as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Novel Data Predictor, using psychological science as a testing field. In Study 1 (Research Librarian), unlike human researchers, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 hallucinated, authoritatively generating fictional references 36.0% and 5.4% of the time, respectively, although GPT-4 exhibited an evolving capacity to acknowledge its fictions. In Study 2 (Research Ethicist), GPT-4 (though not GPT-3.5) proved capable of detecting violations like p-hacking in fictional research protocols, correcting 88.6% of blatantly presented issues, and 72.6% of subtly presented issues. In Study 3 (Data Generator), both models consistently replicated patterns of cultural bias previously discovered in large language corpora, indicating that ChatGPT can simulate known results, an antecedent to usefulness for both data generation and skills like hypothesis generation. Contrastingly, in Study 4 (Novel Data Predictor), neither model was successful at predicting new results absent in their training data, and neither appeared to leverage substantially new information when predicting more vs. less novel outcomes. Together, these results suggest that GPT is a flawed but rapidly improving librarian, a decent research ethicist already, capable of data generation in simple domains with known characteristics but poor at predicting novel patterns of empirical data to aid future experimentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Natural language-based generative artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in scientific research. Intriguingly, capabilities of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) language models beyond the scope of natural language tasks have recently been identified. Here we explored how GPT-4 might be able to perform rudimentary structural biology modeling. We prompted GPT-4 to model 3D structures for the 20 standard amino acids and an α-helical polypeptide chain, with the latter incorporating Wolfram mathematical computation. We also used GPT-4 to perform structural interaction analysis between the anti-viral nirmatrelvir and its target, the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Geometric parameters of the generated structures typically approximated close to experimental references. However, modeling was sporadically error-prone and molecular complexity was not well tolerated. Interaction analysis further revealed the ability of GPT-4 to identify specific amino acid residues involved in ligand binding along with corresponding bond distances. Despite current limitations, we show the current capacity of natural language generative AI to perform basic structural biology modeling and interaction analysis with atomic-scale accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This text explores the comparison between artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence (HI) in the context of project management. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of both AI and HI, highlighting that while AI may excel in certain tasks, it lacks empathy and relationship-building skills. The text suggests that the ideal project manager is a human augmented with AI, as they can leverage the strengths of both to deliver more value in a shorter timeframe. It also emphasizes the importance of individuals adapting and harnessing the capabilities of AI to succeed in the evolving professional landscape. [Extracted from the article]

Artificial intelligence (AI) poses new challenges and opportunities for hospitality and tourism (H&T) education. This study explores how ChatGPT, a chatbot powered by a generative pre-trained transformer model, can affect H&T curriculum design and delivery. Using secondary data from academic articles, news reports, and official documents, the paper applies curriculum theory and stakeholder theory to examine the competencies, expectations, and interests of H&T students, educators, and industry practitioners regarding ChatGPT. This study reveals that ChatGPT can enhance learning outcomes and experiences, improve educational equity and efficiency, and raise ethical, technical, and pedagogical issues for H&T education. This research note also offers insights and recommendations for H&T educators to integrate ChatGPT into their teaching practices and prepare students for research work and careers that incorporate generative AI. Moreover, the study contributes to the literature on H&T education by examining the role and impact of ChatGPT as an innovative and emerging technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Process planning serves as a critical link between design and manufacturing, exerting a pivotal influence on the quality and efficiency of production. However, current intelligent process planning systems, like computer-aided process planning (CAPP), still contend with the challenge of realizing comprehensive automation in process decision-making. These obstacles chiefly involve, though are not confined to, issues like limited intelligence, poor flexibility, low reliability, and high usage thresholds. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has attained noteworthy accomplishments in natural language processing (NLP), offering new perspectives to address these challenges. This paper summarizes the limitations of current intelligent process planning methods and explores the potential of integrating generative AI into process planning. With synergistically incorporating digital twin (DT), this paper introduces a conceptual framework termed generative AI and DT-enabling intelligent process planning (GIPP). The paper elaborates on two supporting methodologies: process generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) modelling and DT-based process verification method. Moreover, a prototype system is established to introduce the implementation and machining execution mechanism of GIPP for milling a specific thin-walled component. Three potential application scenarios and a comparative analysis are employed to elucidate the practicality of GIPP, providing new insights for intelligent process planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unique challenges to the U.S. healthcare system, particularly for nonprofit U.S. hospitals that are obligated to provide community benefits in exchange for federal tax exemptions. We sought to examine how hospitals initiated, modified, or disbanded community benefits programming in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the free-response text in Part IV of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 Schedule H (F990H) to assess health equity and disparities. We combined traditional key term frequency and Hierarchical Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (HDBSCAN) clustering approaches with a novel Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) 3.5 summarization approach. Our research reveals shifts in community benefits programming. We observed an increase in COVID-related terms starting in the 2019 tax year, indicating a pivot in community focus and efforts toward pandemic-related activities such as telehealth services and COVID-19 testing and prevention. The clustering analysis identified themes related to COVID-19 and community benefits. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) summarization with GPT3.5 contextualized these changes, revealing examples of healthcare system adaptations and program cancellations. However, GPT3.5 also encountered some accuracy and validation challenges. This multifaceted text analysis underscores the adaptability of hospitals in maintaining community health support during crises and suggests the potential of advanced AI tools in evaluating large-scale qualitative data for policy and public health research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Educational Psychological Studies (EPS) is the property of Refaad for Studies, Research & Development and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: To examine the ability of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) to answer patients' questions regarding colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Ten clinically relevant questions about CRC were selected from top-rated hospitals' websites and patient surveys and presented to three GAI tools (Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer [GPT-4], Google Bard, and CLOVA X). Their responses were compared with answers from the CRC information book. Response evaluation was performed by two groups, each consisting of five healthcare professionals (HCP) and patients. Each question was scored on a 1–5 Likert scale based on four evaluation criteria (maximum score, 20 points/question). Results: In an analysis including only HCPs, the information book scored 11.8 ± 1.2, GPT-4 scored 13.5 ± 1.1, Google Bard scored 11.5 ± 0.7, and CLOVA X scored 12.2 ± 1.4 (P = 0.001). The score of GPT-4 was significantly higher than those of the information book (P = 0.020) and Google Bard (P = 0.001). In an analysis including only patients, the information book scored 14.1 ± 1.4, GPT-4 scored 15.2 ± 1.8, Google Bard scored 15.5 ± 1.8, and CLOVA X scored 14.4 ± 1.8, without significant differences (P = 0.234). When both groups of evaluators were included, the information book scored 13.0 ± 0.9, GPT-4 scored 14.4 ± 1.2, Google Bard scored 13.5 ± 1.0, and CLOVA X scored 13.3 ± 1.5 (P = 0.070). Conclusion: The three GAIs demonstrated similar or better communicative competence than the information book regarding questions related to CRC surgery in Korean. If high-quality medical information provided by GAI is supervised properly by HCPs and published as an information book, it could be helpful for patients to obtain accurate information and make informed decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This comprehensive exploration of recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) traversed the realms of language models, computer vision, and generative models, unraveling the intricacies of cutting-edge technologies such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Pix2Seq, and multimodal models in terms of generative AI. In this multifaceted journey, the focus extended beyond technological prowess to ethical considerations, emphasizing responsible AI practices guided by Google's AI Principles. The nuanced discussions encapsulated the transformative impact of AI on user experiences across various Google products and toolsets, paving the way for a future where natural language interaction, creative content generation, and multimodal understanding redefine human–computer interactions. The research investigation showcased not only the advancements themselves but also the critical lens through which these innovations are approached, underscoring the importance of ethical and responsible AI in shaping the technological landscape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper introduces the collection of the Journal on Machine Learning (ML) and the user. It provides a brief history of ML from the 1950's through to the current time, sketching the nature of the kinds of precursor AI techniques used in such things as expert systems right the way through to the emergence of ML and its tool sets, including deep learning. It concludes with the 'generative AI' used in such ML technologies as PaLM and GPT-3. The history highlights key changes and developments in ML, the especial importance and limitations of deep learning, and the changing attitudes and expectations of users in an environment when ML can and often is oversold. The paper then explores the ways CSCW research has addressed the social context of organisational systems and how the same can apply for ML tools and techniques. It urges research that focuses on the particular ways that ML comes to fit into 'real world' collaborative work sites and hence speaks to the CSCW cannon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article examines the problem of fabricated citations in AI-generated writing, focusing on large language models like ChatGPT. The author argues that these fake citations reveal issues with both the processing of natural language training data and writing in general. The implications of these false citations for the future of writing and the ethics of accreditation are explored, as well as the limitations and potential dangers of ChatGPT. The article discusses concerns in various fields, such as finance and medicine, and addresses the debate surrounding AI-generated text in scholarly manuscripts and the legal responsibilities of authors. It concludes by discussing the nature of language models and their relationship to human language, suggesting that they are fulfilling poststructuralist predictions about the future of literature. The article also explores the use of language models, specifically the LLM, in generating text and the issues that arise from it. It introduces the concept of "hallucination" to describe the inaccuracies and fabricated citations produced by AI models, while also discussing the controversy surrounding this term and proposing alternative designations. The challenges posed by AI-generated text and their implications for authorship, plagiarism, and privacy are highlighted, emphasizing the need for ethical considerations and a deeper understanding of the role of AI in textual technologies. [Extracted from the article]

This study addresses the significant challenge posed by the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT on the integrity of online examinations, focusing on how these models can undermine academic honesty by demonstrating their latent and advanced reasoning capabilities. An iterative self-reflective strategy was developed for invoking critical thinking and higher-order reasoning in LLMs when responding to complex multimodal exam questions involving both visual and textual data. The proposed strategy was demonstrated and evaluated on real exam questions by subject experts and the performance of ChatGPT (GPT-4) with vision was estimated on an additional dataset of 600 text descriptions of multimodal exam questions. The results indicate that the proposed self-reflective strategy can invoke latent multi-hop reasoning capabilities within LLMs, effectively steering them towards correct answers by integrating critical thinking from each modality into the final response. Meanwhile, ChatGPT demonstrated considerable proficiency in being able to answer multimodal exam questions across 12 subjects. These findings challenge prior assertions about the limitations of LLMs in multimodal reasoning and emphasise the need for robust online exam security measures such as advanced proctoring systems and more sophisticated multimodal exam questions to mitigate potential academic misconduct enabled by AI technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explores the biases present in artificial intelligence (AI) tools, focusing on GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bing. The performance of the tools has been compared with a group of experts in linguistics, and journalists specialized in breaking news and international affairs. It reveals that GPT-3.5, widely accessible and free, exhibits a higher tendency rate in its word generation, suggesting an intrinsic bias within the tool itself rather than in the input data. Comparatively, GPT-4 and Bing demonstrate differing patterns in term generation and subjectivity, with GPT-4 aligning more closely with expert opinions and producing fewer opinative words. The research highlights the extensive use of generative AI in media and among the general populace, emphasizing the need for careful reliance on AI-generated content. The findings stress the risks of misinformation and biased reporting inherent in unexamined AI outputs. The challenge for journalists and information professionals is to ensure accuracy and ethical judgment in content creation to maintain the quality and diversity of content in journalistic practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the use of large language models for empirical legal research. It highlights the potential of generative language models to perform research tasks that are typically done by humans. The author emphasizes the need for further exploration and understanding of how to effectively use these models in research, as their performance can vary depending on the domain and task. The article also suggests the importance of human involvement in the analysis and validation of AI-generated data. Overall, the article provides valuable insights into the current capabilities and limitations of large language models in the field of legal research. [Extracted from the article]

Copyright of Elektronik Industrie is the property of Hüthig GmbH and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Large language models can help to compile content with a cultural theme. However, any information generated by large language models needs to be evaluated to see the truth/fact of the information generated. With many studies discussing the comparison of the capabilities of large language models, there is not much research that directly discusses the comparison of the performance of large language models in producing Indonesian cultural content. This research compares the correctness of the information generated by the large language model using the expert judgment method when creating Indonesian cultural content and its finetuning capabilities evaluated using BERTScore. The evaluation method was successfully applied and the results show that in this case, PaLM-2 included less misinformation while GPT-3 excelled in finetuning. Using the combination of expert judgment and BERTScore makes it possible to evaluate large language models and obtain additional valid training data to correct deficiencies. The results showed that PaLM-2 produced more valid content with a score of 27 points, while GPT-3 scored 8 points. For training on new datasets/fine-tuning, it was found that the GPT-3 language model was able to learn the dataset more quickly, with a time of 50 minutes and a cost of IDR 27,000, while PaLM-2 took 2 hours 10 minutes and a cost of IDR 1,377,204. For the training dataset evaluation results, GPT-3 is superior with an average of all scores reaching 0.85205. Meanwhile, the PaLM-2 Tuned Model got an average overall score of 0.78942. In this case, the GPT-3 Tuned Model is superior by 8 %. In practice, this method can be used if the assessment is descriptive and requires direct assessment from experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The electricity market in Spain holds significant importance in the nation's economy and sustainability efforts due to its diverse energy mix that encompasses renewables, fossil fuels, and nuclear power. Accurate energy price prediction is crucial in Spain, influencing the country's ability to meet its climate goals and ensure energy security and affecting economic stakeholders. We have explored how leveraging advanced GPT tools like OpenAI's ChatGPT to analyze energy news and expert reports can extract valuable insights and generate additional variables for electricity price trend prediction in the Spanish market. Our research proposes two different training and modelling approaches of generative pre-trained transformers (GPT) with specialized news feeds specific to the Spanish market: in-context example prompts and fine-tuned GPT models. We aim to shed light on the capabilities of GPT solutions and demonstrate how they can augment prediction models by introducing additional variables. Our findings suggest that insights derived from GPT analysis of electricity news and specialized reports align closely with price fluctuations post-publication, indicating their potential to improve predictions and offer deeper insights into market dynamics. This endeavor can support informed decision-making for stakeholders in the Spanish electricity market and companies reliant on electricity costs and price volatility for their margins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores the potential use of AI-driven chatbots in personalized travel health assistance. It introduces Custom GPTs, which allow users to create specialized AI models for specific purposes. The article proposes a set of desirable features for travel medicine chatbots, including a comprehensive knowledge base, up-to-date information, respect for professional medical advice, and data privacy. It also emphasizes the importance of user-friendly interfaces, multilingual support, geolocation services, and integration with electronic health records. The article provides an example of a custom GPT called the Italian Travel Medicine Advisor (ITMA) and discusses its adherence to the proposed features. The authors suggest that AI chatbots can be a valuable tool in travel medicine, providing initial engagement and information to travelers before seeking in-person medical advice. However, further research is needed to evaluate the impact and accuracy of AI-driven chatbots in travel medicine. [Extracted from the article]

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT‐4 and Claude are catalyzing transformation across medical research including rheumatology. This review examines their applications, highlighting the pivotal role of prompt engineering in effectively guiding LLMs. Key aspects explored include literature synthesis, data analysis, manuscript drafting, coding assistance, privacy considerations, and generative artificial intelligence integrations. While LLMs accelerate workflows, reliance without apt prompting jeopardizes accuracy. By methodically constructing prompts and gauging model outputs, researchers can maximize relevance and utility. Locally run open‐source models also offer data privacy protections. As LLMs permeate rheumatology research, developing expertise in strategic prompting and assessing model limitations is critical. With proper oversight, LLMs markedly boost scholarly productivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores the emerging field of prompt engineering within generative AI, emphasizing its role as a critical intersection between art and science. Prompt engineering is identified as the key to unlocking the full potential of generative AI technologies by optimizing human-AI communication. Through a comprehensive analysis of the related literature, this study illustrates how prompt engineering transcends mere technical manipulation, requiring a blend of creativity, strategic thinking, and a deep understanding of generative AI capabilities. This paper provides various strategies for crafting effective prompts, from simple to sophisticated techniques, highlighting the importance of ethical considerations and the potential risks associated with prompt manipulation. By establishing a set of principles and guidelines, this paper aims to advance prompt engineering as a discipline essential for enhancing AI's functionality and reliability and, with this justification, introduces the 'Prompt Engineering for Gen[i]erative AI Framework'. After all, this paper calls for a multidisciplinary approach to prompt engineering, advocating for its recognition and development as a pivotal component of AI literacy and application. Through this exploration, this paper intends to contribute to the evolving dialogue on the integration of human creativity with generative AI capabilities, offering insights into the future of effective and ethical AI interaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article explores the transformative impact of ChatGPT, a Generative Pre-trained Transformers model, on humanities methodologies and its integration into a digital humanities (DH) course. The advent of ChatGPT enhances the capacity of people without coding experience to acquire, process, analyse and interpret art historical data, fostering a unique blend of generative AI development and humanistic inquiries. The article presents pedagogical experiences in incorporating ChatGPT, into a digital humanities course, with a focus on learning prompt engineering, a vital skill in handling art historical data. The iterative process of crafting prompts, receiving responses and refining prompts again enables the model to generate custom solutions tailored to individual inquiries. The practices of processing and analysing data are no longer arcane, exclusive to certain fields; they open up new avenues for research hypotheses that go beyond traditional qualitative and quantitative methods. The article underscores the immense significance of the prompts we input for the tasks at hand and the continuous nature of refinement and improvement in AI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: ChatGPT represents the most popular and widely used generative artificial intelligence (AI) model that received significant attention in healthcare research. The aim of the current study was to assess the future trajectory of the needed research in this domain based on the recommendations of the top influential published records. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (27–30 November 2023) to identify the top ten ChatGPT-related published records in healthcare across the three databases. Classification of the records as “top” denoting high influence in the field was based on citation counts. Results: A total of 22 unique records from 17 different journals representing 14 different publishers were identified as the top ChatGPT-related publications in healthcare subject. Based on the identified records’ recommendations, the following themes appeared as important areas to consider in future ChatGPT research in healthcare: improving healthcare education, improved efficiency of clinical processes (e.g., documentation), addressing ethical concerns (e.g., patient privacy and consent), supporting research tasks (e.g., data analysis, manuscript preparation), mitigating ChatGPT output biases, improving patient education and engagement, and developing standardized assessment protocols for ChatGPT utility in healthcare. Conclusions: The current review highlighted key areas to be prioritized in assessment of ChatGPT utility in healthcare. Interdisciplinary collaborations and standardizing methodologies are needed to synthesize robust evidence in these studies. Based on these recommendations and the promising potential of ChatGPT on healthcare, JMJ launched a call for papers for a special issue entitled “Evaluating Generative AI-Based Models in Healthcare”. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This viewpoint article explores the transformative capabilities of large language models (LLMs) like the Chat Generative Pre-training Transformer (ChatGPT) within the property valuation industry. It particularly accentuates the pivotal role of prompt engineering in facilitating valuation reporting and advocates for adopting the "Red Book" compliance Chain-of-thought (COT) prompt engineering as a gold standard for generating AI-facilitated valuation reports. Design/methodology/approach: The article offers a high-level examination of the application of LLMs in real estate research, highlighting the essential role of prompt engineering for future advancements in generative AI. It explores the collaborative dynamic between valuers and AI advancements, emphasising the importance of precise instructions and contextual cues in directing LLMs to generate accurate and reproducible valuation outcomes. Findings: Integrating LLMs into property valuation processes paves the way for efficiency improvements and task automation, such as generating reports and drafting contracts. AI-facilitated reports offer unprecedented transparency and elevate client experiences. The fusion of valuer expertise with prompt engineering ensures the reliability and interpretability of valuation reports. Practical implications: Delineating the types and versions of LLMs used in AI-generated valuation reports encourage the adoption of transparency best practices within the industry. Valuers, as expert prompt engineers, can harness the potential of AI to enhance efficiency, accuracy and transparency in the valuation process, delivering significant benefits to a broad array of stakeholders. Originality/value: The article elucidates the substantial impact of prompt engineering in leveraging LLMs within the property industry. It underscores the importance of valuers training their unique GPT models, enabling customisation and reproducibility of valuation outputs. The symbiotic relationship between valuers and LLMs is identified as a key driver shaping the future of property valuations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explores the capability of academic staff assisted by the Turnitin Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tool to identify the use of AI-generated content in university assessments. 22 different experimental submissions were produced using Open AI's ChatGPT tool, with prompting techniques used to reduce the likelihood of AI detectors identifying AI-generated content. These submissions were marked by 15 academic staff members alongside genuine student submissions. Although the AI detection tool identified 91% of the experimental submissions as containing AI-generated content, only 54.8% of the content was identified as AI-generated, underscoring the challenges of detecting AI content when advanced prompting techniques are used. When academic staff members marked the experimental submissions, only 54.5% were reported to the academic misconduct process, emphasising the need for greater awareness of how the results of AI detectors may be interpreted. Similar performance in grades was obtained between student submissions and AI-generated content (AI mean grade: 52.3, Student mean grade: 54.4), showing the capabilities of AI tools in producing human-like responses in real-life assessment situations. Recommendations include adjusting the overall strategies for assessing university students in light of the availability of new Generative AI tools. This may include reducing the overall reliance on assessments where AI tools may be used to mimic human writing, or by using AI-inclusive assessments. Comprehensive training must be provided for both academic staff and students so that academic integrity may be preserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a novel type of library technology. AI technologies and the needs of data librarians are hybrid and symbiotic, because academic libraries must insert AI technologies into their information and data services. Library services need AI to interpret the context of big data. OBJECTIVES: In this context, we explore the use of the OpenAI Codex, a deep learning model trained on Python code from repositories, to generate code scripts for data librarians. This investigation examines the practices, models, and methodologies for obtaining code script insights from complex code environments linked to AI GPT technologies. METHODS: The proposed AI-powered method aims to assist data librarians in creating code scripts using Python libraries and plugins such as the integrated development environment PyCharm, with additional support from the Machinet AI and Bito AI plugins. The process involves collaboration between the data librarian and the AI agent, with the librarian providing a natural language description of the programming problem and the OpenAI Codex generating the solution code in Python. RESULTS: Five specific web-scraping problems are presented. The scripts demonstrate how to extract data, calculate metrics, and write the results to files. CONCLUSION: Overall, this study highlights the application of AI in assisting data librarians with code script creation for web scraping tasks. AI may be a valuable resource for data librarians dealing with big data challenges on the Web. The possibility of creating Python code with AI is of great value, as AI technologies can help data librarians work with various types of data sources. The Python code in Data Science web scraping projects uses a machine-learning model that can generate human-like code to help create and improve the library service for extracting data from a web collection. The ability of nonprogramming data librarians to use AI technologies facilitates their interactions with all types and data sources. The Python programming language has artificial intelligence modules, packages, and plugins such as the OpenAI Codex, which serialises automation and navigation in web browsers to simulate human behaviour on pages by entering passwords, selecting captcha options, collecting data, and creating different collections of datasets to be viewed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article provides an overview of the current state and potential future of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education. The focus is on GPT-4o, an enhanced generative AI model, and its implications for educational reform. The article discusses how GPT-4o can improve intelligent teaching systems, homework grading, tutoring systems, and speech interaction systems, offering personalized course content and teaching plans tailored to individual learning styles. However, the article also highlights concerns about the opacity of AI algorithms, data privacy and security risks, fairness in personalized learning tools, and the need for high-quality training data. Despite these challenges, the article concludes that GPT-4o has the potential to enhance personalized education and create more inclusive and diverse learning environments. [Extracted from the article]