Search

We report an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 501Y.V2 in a nursing home. All nonvaccinated residents (5/5) versus half of those vaccinated with BNT162b2 (13/26) were infected. Two of 13 vaccinated versus 4 of 5 nonvaccinated residents presented severe disease. BNT162b2 did not prevent the outbreak, but reduced transmission and disease severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article informs about outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variant B.1.351 (β) in a nursing home where of residents had been fully vaccinated by means of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. It mentions that studies suggested that BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination does not fully protect from outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 (β) in elderly nursing homes.

Objectives To investigate the best conditions of raltegravir use to avoid the selection of resistance mutations in the three main genetic pathways: 148, 155 and 143. Methods A total of 161 patients failing on raltegravir with two consecutive HIV-1 viral loads >20 copies/mL were studied. Ten parameters [HIV-1 RNA and CD4 at baseline and failure, genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) of treatment associated with raltegravir, protease inhibitors used, time spent on raltegravir, subtype, sex and age] were tested in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and compared with the emergence of resistance mutations to raltegravir at failure. Phenotypic susceptibility to raltegravir was studied in 16 patients without the main resistance mutations to raltegravir at failure. Results At raltegravir failure, 46/161 patients (28.6%) had integrase resistance mutations, whereas 115/161 (71.4%) had no resistance mutations. High HIV-1 viral load level at failure (OR = 2.81, 95% CI 1.8–4.6, P < 0.001) and low GSS of treatment associated with raltegravir (OR = 11.6, 95% CI 4.5–36.4, P < 0.001) were independently associated with the selection of raltegravir mutations. The percentages of patients with integrase resistance mutations were 7.7% (6/78) versus 48.1% (40/83) when viral load is ≤200 or >200 copies/mL and 47.5% (39/82) versus 8.9% (7/79) when GSS is <2 or ≥2. Among patients without main resistance mutations, two patients showed raltegravir phenotypic resistance, one naturally with F121Y at baseline and the other acquiring G118R at failure. Conclusions Our results show that to avoid the selection of raltegravir resistance mutations, patients have to be treated with at least two active drugs in combination with raltegravir and to maintain a viral load ≤200 copies/mL. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Background: HIV-1 accessory Vpr protein is involved in the reverse transcription process and has been shown to modulate the virus mutation rate. This process may play a role in the kinetics of appearance of drug resistance mutations under antiretroviral treatment. Methods: Vpr sequences were analyzed from plasma viruses derived from 97 HIV-1-infected individuals failing antiretroviral treatment and 63 antiretroviral-naïve patients. Vpr genetic variability was analyzed for association with specific drug treatment and drug resistance mutations. Biological and virological experiments were employed to characterize a mutation in Vpr found to be associated with virological failure. Results: E17A mutation located in the first α-helix of Vpr was more prevalent in HAART-treated individuals compared to untreated individuals. E17A was associated with thymidine analog mutations (TAMs) in reverse transcriptase M41L, L210W and T215Y and with the use of didanosine in the patients’ treatment histories. E17A had no impact on the biochemical and functional properties of Vpr, and did not affect kinetics of replication of wild-type or TAMs-containing viruses. However, its association with TAMs and the use of didanosine was consistent with phenotypic susceptibility assays showing a significant 3-fold decrease in didanosine susceptibility of viruses harboring Vpr E17A combined with TAMs compared to viruses harboring TAMs alone. Conclusion: These findings highlight a novel role of Vpr in HIV-1 drug resistance. Vpr E17A confers resistance to didanosine when associated with TAMs. Whether Vpr E17A facilitates excision of didanosine is still to be determined. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background Most of the previous studies that explored the molecular basis of raltegravir resistance were conducted studying the HIV-1 B subtype. It has been shown that the CRF02_AG subtype in relation to its natural integrase (IN) sequence could develop different genetic pathways associated with raltegravir resistance. The aim of this study was to explore resistance pathways preferably used by CRF02_AG viruses compared with subtype B. Methods Twenty-five HIV-1 CRF02_AG-infected patients failing a raltegravir-containing regimen were studied. IN gene sequences were examined for the presence of previously described IN inhibitor (raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir and MK-2048) resistance mutations at 20 amino acid positions. Results Among the 25 studied patients, 7 showed viruses harbouring major raltegravir resistance mutations mainly associated with the 155 genetic pathways and 18 showed viruses harbouring none of them; however, for 1 patient, we found a 118R mutation, associated with MK-2048 in vitro resistance, in a 74M background. For this patient, the phenotypic analysis showed that addition of only the G118R mutation conferred a high level of resistance to raltegravir (fold change = 25.5) and elvitegravir (fold change = 9.2). Conclusions This study confirmed that mutation pathways for raltegravir resistance could be different between the two subtypes CRF02_AG and B with a preferential use of the 155 mutation in non-B subtypes. A new genetic pathway associated with raltegravir resistance, including the 118R mutation, has also been identified. This new genetic pathway, never described in subtype B, should be further evaluated for phenotypic susceptibility to dolutegravir and MK-2048. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTLs) play a critical role in controlling viral infections. HIV-infected individuals develop CTL responses against epitopes derived from viral proteins, but also against cryptic epitopes encoded by viral alternative reading frames (ARF). We studied here the mechanisms of HIV-1 escape from CTLs targeting one such cryptic epitope, Q9VF, encoded by an HIVgag ARF and presented by HLA-B*07. Using PBMCs of HIV-infected patients, we first cloned and sequenced proviral DNA encoding for Q9VF. We identified several polymorphisms with a minority of proviruses encoding at position 5 an aspartic acid (Q9VF/5D) and a majority encoding an asparagine (Q9VF/5N). We compared the prevalence of each variant in PBMCs of HLA-B*07+ and HLA-B*07- patients. Proviruses encoding Q9VF/5D were significantly less represented in HLA-B*07+ than in HLA-B*07- patients, suggesting that Q9FV/5D encoding viruses might be under selective pressure in HLA-B*07+ individuals. We thus analyzed ex vivo CTL responses directed against Q9VF/5D and Q9VF/5N. Around 16% of HLA-B*07+ patients exhibited CTL responses targeting Q9VF epitopes. The frequency and the magnitude of CTL responses induced with Q9VF/ 5D or Q9VF/5N peptides were almost equal indicating a possible cross-reactivity of the same CTLs on the two peptides. We then dissected the cellular mechanisms involved in the presentation of Q9VF variants. As expected, cells infected with HIV strains encoding for Q9VF/5D were recognized by Q9VF/5D-specific CTLs. In contrast, Q9VF/5N-encoding strains were neither recognized by Q9VF/5N- nor by Q9VF/5D-specific CTLs. Using in vitro proteasomal digestions and MS/MS analysis, we demonstrate that the 5N variation introduces a strong proteasomal cleavage site within the epitope, leading to a dramatic reduction of Q9VF epitope production. Our results strongly suggest that HIV-1 escapes CTL surveillance by introducing mutations leading to HIV ARF-epitope destruction by proteasomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Resistance to attachment inhibitor BMS-626529, which inhibits the binding of HIV to CD4, involves mutations in the HIV-1 gp120 gene. There is a lack of information on the primary resistance of HIV-1 subtype B to attachment inhibitors, so we decided to investigate. Methods Sequences from 109 attachment-inhibitor-naive patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B were analysed for the presence of previously described in vivo resistance mutations associated with attachment inhibitor BMS-626529 and tropism determination. Results The M426L substitution associated with a reduced efficacy of the attachment inhibitor BMS-626529 was present at 7.3%. There was no difference in mutation distribution according to virus tropism (R5 or X4). Conclusions The attachment inhibitor BMS-626529 is suitable for most patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives To compare the frequency of previously in vitro-selected integrase mutations (T124A, T124A/S153F, S153Y, T124A/S153Y and L101I/T124A/S153Y) conferring resistance to S/GSK1349572 between HIV-1 subtype B integrase inhibitor (INI)-naive and raltegravir-treated patients. Methods Integrase sequences from 650 INI-naive patients and 84 raltegravir-treated patients were analysed. Results The T124A mutation alone and the combination T124A/L101I were more frequent in raltegravir-failing patients than in INI-naive patients (39.3% versus 24.5%, respectively, P = 0.005 for T124A and 20.2% versus 10.0%, respectively, P = 0.008 for T124A/L101I). The S153Y/F mutations were not detected in any integrase sequence (except for S153F alone, only detected in one INI-naive patient). Conclusions T124A and T124A/L101I, more frequent in raltegravir-treated patients, could have some effect on raltegravir response and their presence could play a role in the selection of other mutations conferring S/GSK1349572 resistance. The impact of raltegravir-mediated changes such as these on the virological response to S/GSK1349572 should be studied further. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: This study aimed to identify factors associated with virological response (VR) to raltegravir (RAL)-containing regimens in 468 treatment-experienced but integrase inhibitor-naive HIV-1 patients receiving a RAL-containing regimen. VR was defined at Month 6 (M6) as HIV-1 RNA viral load (VL) <50copies/mL. The impacts on VR of baseline integrase mutations, VL, CD4 count, genotypic sensitivity score for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors, and the number of new antiretrovirals used for the first time associated with RAL were investigated. For patients with VL >50copies/mL at M6, integrase mutations selected were characterised. Median baseline VL was 4.2log10 copies/mL (IQR 3.3–4.9log10 copies/mL) and CD4 count was 219 cells/mm3 (IQR 96–368 cells/mm3). At M6, 71% of patients were responders. In multivariate analysis, baseline VL and CD4 count and ≥2 new antiretrovirals among darunavir, etravirine, maraviroc and enfuvirtide were associated with VR to RAL. Neither HIV-1 subtype nor baseline integrase polymorphisms were associated with VR to RAL. Among 63 failing patients at M6, selection of ≥1 change in the integrase gene was observed in 49 (77.8%), and 27/63 (42.9%) were considered as RAL-associated resistance mutations. Factors independently associated with the occurrence of ≥1 RAL-associated resistance mutation were VL at failure >3log10 and having no new drugs associated with RAL. RAL showed great potency in treatment-experienced patients. The number of new drugs associated with RAL was an important factor associated with VR. HIV-1 subtype and baseline integrase polymorphisms do not influence the RAL VR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]