Search

ABCA4 -associated mutation screening is extensively performed in European, African, American and several other populations for various retinopathies. However, it has not been well studied in a Russian cohort. Using next-generation (325 genes inherited disease panel) and Sanger sequencing technologies for the first time we documented the spectrum of genetic variations in a Russian retinopathy cohort of 51 patients from 10 ethnic groups. We found ABCA4 variations in 70.5% cases and one case with BEST1 variation. Multiple ABCA4 variations, ABCA4 + RDH12 , and ABCA4 + BEST1 variations are also observed and the disease severity is found proportionate to the variation burden. Ten novel ABCA4 variations are detected of which 8 belongs to non-Slavonian population. Most of the detected known variations are found in European and American Stargardt disease populations. No retinopathy causing variation is detected in 14 (27%) cases suggesting that in this Russian retinopathies cohort the causal variants could be in genes that are not covered by our 325 gene panel. Therefore, whole genome/exome analysis is required to identify novel retinopathy associated genes and provide better disease management for this heterogeneous cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Some families with hereditary retinoblastoma exhibit mild phenotype with low penetrance and variable expressivity, including complete absence of clinical signs of the disease in some carriers of the germline RB1 mutation. The identification of low-penetrance mutations in the RB1 gene and the study of their inheritance in pedigrees is contributing to understanding the mechanisms underlying the development of retinoblastoma with low penetrance. It is important both for further expansion of knowledge in the field of molecular genetics of retinoblastoma, and for competent genetic counseling and subsequent clinical management of families with this form of the disease. Our results support an assumption that parental origin of an RB1 mutation influences the likelihood of developing retinoblastoma. We also revealed a relatively high frequency of asymptomatic carriage of the RB1 mutations among the parents of retinoblastoma patients, highlighting the utmost necessity for molecular analysis among the probands' relatives irrespective of their clinical status and family history of retinoblastoma. Our aim was to identify RB1 alterations causing hereditary low penetrance retinoblastoma and to evaluate how the parental origin of an RB1 mutation affects its phenotypic expression. By NGS and MLPA, RB1 mutations were found in 191 from 332 unrelated retinoblastoma patients. Among patients with identified RB1 mutations but without clinical family history of retinoblastoma, 7% (12/175) were found to have hereditary disease with one of the parents being an asymptomatic carrier of an RB1 mutation. Additionally, in two families with retinoblastoma history, mutations were inherited by probands from unaffected parents. Overall, nine probands inherited RB1 mutations from clinically unaffected fathers and five, from mothers. Yet, we gained explanations of maternal "unaffectedness" in most cases, either as somatic mosaicism or as clinical presentation of retinomas in involution, rendering the proportion of paternal to maternal truly asymptomatic mutation carriers as 9:1 (p = 0.005). This observation supports an assumption that parental origin of an RB1 mutation influences the likelihood of developing retinoblastoma. Additionally, our study revealed a relatively high frequency of asymptomatic carriage of the RB1 mutations among the parents of retinoblastoma patients, highlighting the utmost necessity of molecular analysis among the probands' relatives irrespective of their clinical status and family history of retinoblastoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation/demethylation, covalent modifications of histone proteins, and chromatin remodeling, create specific patterns of gene expression. Epigenetic deregulations are associated with oncogenesis, relapse of the disease and metastases, and can serve as a useful clinical marker. We assessed the clinical relevance of integrity of the genes coding for epigenetic regulator proteins by mutational profiling of 25 genes in 135 gastric cancer (GC) samples. Overall, mutations in the epigenetic regulation genes were found to be significantly associated with reduced overall survival of patients in the group with metastases and in the group with tumors with signet ring cells. We have also discovered mutual exclusivity of somatic mutations in the KMT2D, KMT2C, ARID1A, and CHD7 genes in our cohort. Our results suggest that mutations in epigenetic regulation genes may be valuable clinical markers and deserve further exploration in independent cohorts. We have performed mutational profiling of 25 genes involved in epigenetic processes on 135 gastric cancer (GC) samples. In total, we identified 79 somatic mutations in 49/135 (36%) samples. The minority (n = 8) of mutations was identified in DNA methylation/demethylation genes, while the majority (n = 41), in histone modifier genes, among which mutations were most commonly found in KMT2D and KMT2C. Somatic mutations in KMT2D, KMT2C, ARID1A and CHD7 were mutually exclusive (p = 0.038). Mutations in ARID1A were associated with distant metastases (p = 0.03). The overall survival of patients in the group with metastases and in the group with tumors with signet ring cells was significantly reduced in the presence of mutations in epigenetic regulation genes (p = 0.036 and p = 0.041, respectively). Separately, somatic mutations in chromatin remodeling genes correlate with low survival rate of patients without distant metastasis (p = 0.045) and in the presence of signet ring cells (p = 0.0014). Our results suggest that mutations in epigenetic regulation genes may be valuable clinical markers and deserve further exploration in independent cohorts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]